Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums
 



Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > Modeling Section > Group Builds > #4, Heavy Hitters

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-21-2009, 11:31 PM   #121
Senior Member
 
dirkpitt289's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South Plainfield New Jersey
Posts: 830
Inspiring work so far. Will have to keep this thread bookmarked for when I get back to my twin 262 build.
__________________


Regards,
Dirk
dirkpitt289 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2009, 11:52 PM   #122
Senior Member
 
vikingBerserker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 6,167
Send a message via MSN to vikingBerserker Send a message via Yahoo to vikingBerserker
Sorry Andy no luck. I could not find any pics of the 2-gun gunbay.
__________________
Take arrows in your forehead, but never in your back. - Samurai maxim


vikingBerserker is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2009, 11:57 PM   #123
Senior Member
 
Crimea_River's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,439
Thanks guys.

Dirk check out Wayne's 262 build. It's a beauty. http://www.ww2aircraft.net/forum/1-d...ild-16694.html (Done Me262A-1a ‘White 2’ ErprobungsKommando 262 Gruppe Build)
Crimea_River is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2009, 09:20 AM   #124
Senior Member
 
ozhawk40's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Live on the Oz West Coast - Perth
Posts: 803
Awesome work there CR, it's looking fantastic!

Cheers

Peter
__________________

ozhawk40 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2009, 06:01 PM   #125
Senior Member
 
Crimea_River's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,439
A little more today. Got a bit of gluing out of the way and worked on the gun bay.

Photo 1 shows a bunch of bits clamped together and glued. The engine nacelles fit nicely together. The main tires have an incorrect tread pattern but I'm going to loose part of it anyway filing the seams. I'll make it look worn.... yeah that's it.

Photo 2 shows one of the rear nozzles and the odd redish metallic colour I mixed with silver, black and a dab of red. Close enough I think.

Photo 3 is the underside of the gun bay. I didn't realize until dry fitting this piece to the metal nose weight, that the recessed area forms the roof of the nose wheel well and is visible. As a result, there were 2 ejector pin marks that had to go but this was a tight spot. After allowing the putty to dry, I fabricated the sanding stick shown to the left in the picture out of sprue and glued on a piece of sandpaper and smoothed this area down. Worked nicely. There will be hydraulics and electrical wiring added in here later as well.

Photo 4 is the gun bay assembled and painted. I decided to leave in the upper electrical boxes even though the two cannons they serve were left off the A-2. The yellow patches are stickers with wiring schematics. These will be scrathed up a bit later to simulate lettering. Also to come will be wiring for the two cannons.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 091122 Misc Parts.jpg (221.5 KB, 50 views)
File Type: jpg 091122 Nozzle.jpg (182.4 KB, 49 views)
File Type: jpg 091122 Nose Wheel Well ejector marks.jpg (208.9 KB, 49 views)
File Type: jpg 091122 Gun Bay.jpg (198.0 KB, 49 views)
Crimea_River is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2009, 07:09 PM   #126
Senior Member
 
dirkpitt289's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South Plainfield New Jersey
Posts: 830
Looking real good. I like the amount of detail you are putting into this bird. It makes me jealous sometimes that you can't always do that amount of detail in 1/72. I know anything is possible but at some point you have to ask yourself if its worth it
__________________


Regards,
Dirk
dirkpitt289 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2009, 07:12 PM   #127
Senior Member
 
Heinz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 7,678
Its really looking awesome man!
__________________
Heinz is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2009, 07:15 PM   #128
Senior Member
 
vikingBerserker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 6,167
Send a message via MSN to vikingBerserker Send a message via Yahoo to vikingBerserker
I agree, this is looking pretty sharp!
__________________
Take arrows in your forehead, but never in your back. - Samurai maxim


vikingBerserker is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2009, 07:53 PM   #129
Senior Member
 
Crimea_River's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,439
Quote:
Originally Posted by dirkpitt289 View Post
Looking real good. I like the amount of detail you are putting into this bird. It makes me jealous sometimes that you can't always do that amount of detail in 1/72. I know anything is possible but at some point you have to ask yourself if its worth it
Actually, I ask that all the time even in 1/48. There are times I want to build just straight out of the box but when I see details missing that I know are there and that I can add, it just bugs me not to do it. But I definitely would go nuts in 1/72 trying to do this. That's why I exclusively do 1/48 stuff right now.
Crimea_River is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2009, 08:02 PM   #130
Senior Member
 
dirkpitt289's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South Plainfield New Jersey
Posts: 830
Maybe you guys discussed this already but what model 262 had 2 guns verse 4? i thought 4 was the standard armament.
__________________


Regards,
Dirk
dirkpitt289 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2009, 08:06 PM   #131
Senior Member
 
javlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: MS
Posts: 1,151
some Nice work there Andy Cheers Kevin
__________________
There is no "overkill". There is only "open fire" and "I need to reload".
A little trust goes a long way. The less you use, the further you'll go.

"We don't want war. Nor will we tolerate slavery."

"A free man would rather die on his feet than live on his knees."


javlin is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2009, 08:27 PM   #132
Senior Member
 
B-17engineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: New Jersey..The Garden State!
Posts: 9,206
Send a message via AIM to B-17engineer
Holy crap Andy! Nice work!
__________________
Sh! I'm hunting Wabits!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pe36UMRkRbk

B-17engineer is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2009, 09:29 PM   #133
Senior Member
 
Crimea_River's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,439
Thanks for the kind words everybody!

Quote:
Originally Posted by dirkpitt289 View Post
Maybe you guys discussed this already but what model 262 had 2 guns verse 4? i thought 4 was the standard armament.
The A-1a model was the fighter version of the 262 and had 4 cannons. The A-2a waas designed specifically as a fighter bomber and eliminated 2 of the guns to partly make up for the bomb load. The MK 108s weighed about 53 kg each. Some A-1a's were also fitted with bomb racks and the guns may or may not have been removed in the field.
Crimea_River is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2009, 10:34 PM   #134
Senior Member
 
dirkpitt289's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South Plainfield New Jersey
Posts: 830
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crimea_River View Post
The A-1a model was the fighter version of the 262 and had 4 cannons. The A-2a waas designed specifically as a fighter bomber and eliminated 2 of the guns to partly make up for the bomb load. The MK 108s weighed about 53 kg each. Some A-1a's were also fitted with bomb racks and the guns may or may not have been removed in the field.
Thanks for the update Crimea, I love the plane but admit I know very little about them.
__________________


Regards,
Dirk
dirkpitt289 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2009, 04:36 AM   #135
Senior Member
 
Vic Balshaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Canberra
Posts: 1,595
Andy, this is great work, that just seems to get better, if that's possible.

With regards to the wire, I also strip down electric cable and if I can get my hands on it, the fine cable from old video machines or anything that’s electronic, including discarded the boards that can have loads of useful scraps on them. In other words, nothing gets thrown, just in case.
__________________

At the going down of the sun, and in the morning, we will remember them.
Lest We Forget
Vic Balshaw is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:49 PM.
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
Ad Management plugin by RedTyger
Design by HTWoRKS


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125