Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Parmigiano Would be interesting if some of the 'technical' guys in the forum could give some information about the aerodynamical/handling/efficiency (presumed) superiority of the canard configuration. |
On the handling I agree...the center o gravity (cg) is long before the nutral point of the wing...so the plane is more responsive to the controls like having the CG moved a little back on normal configuration.
In Rc-sailplanes we move back the CG just a little before the plane is unstable to have faster turning and good acro..
On the side of efficiency I don't agree so much.
Most of the airfoils fly "better" with the cg on 25/30% of the mean aerodynamic chord ...for autostable foils we are around 12/17%.
In a canard configuration the Cg is really near the leading edge of the wing...so rotating moment would be very high and the stab would need a very big longitudinal anhedral to compensate...
Also I seem to remember to have read they cannot have flaps