 | P-38 Mods| Aircraft Pictures Discuss P-38 Mods in the World War II - Aviation forums; No, the P-38 was not tested with Merlins. It was too much of a modification to do so.... |
|
02-07-2005, 09:31 AM
|
#16 | | "Shooter"
Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Moorpark, CA
Posts: 12,537
Country: | No, the P-38 was not tested with Merlins. It was too much of a modification to do so.
__________________ http://www.vg-photo.com Wherever their bones may lie, the courage of heroes is consecrated in the hearts and engraved in the history of the free. Lt Col Honner DSO MC, 39th Commander speaking of the dead from the battle of Kokoda. |
| |
02-07-2005, 09:46 AM
|
#17 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 12,057
Country: |  Okay, maybe they reckoned it wouldn't do much..
__________________ "When you go home tomorrow, don't expect anyone to know what you have been through. Even if they did know, most people probably wouldn't care anyway. Some of you may get the medals you deserve, many more of you will not. But remember this, all of you are now members of the front-line club, and that is the most exclusive club in the world." - Lt. Col. Matthew Maer CO 1st Battalion, the Princess of Wale's Royal Regiment. Camp Abu Naji, Oct. 2004  To those in that club. |
| |
02-07-2005, 10:11 AM
|
#18 | | Konfused with a 'K'
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Turin, Italy
Posts: 20,412
Country: | Nah it wouldnt have done....the Allisons done the job well enough.
__________________ with my one last gaping breath id apologise for bleeding on your shirt... |
| |
02-07-2005, 05:15 PM
|
#19 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 180
| One way to find how the Merlin-powered P-38 could theoretical have performed is to look at the P-51 Mustang. The P-51 in early version had the Allison-engine and later it then convert whit the Merlin-engine, could someone tell what difference had those 2 version of Mustang have for performance. Would that help us give a hint of how Merlin-engined P-38 would be? |
| |
02-07-2005, 06:36 PM
|
#20 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 12,057
Country: | No because (don't quote me on this) I think the Allisons in the P-38 were super-charged, those on the P-51 were not. The Merlin was super-charged, two stage, I believe..that's why it was better.
__________________ "When you go home tomorrow, don't expect anyone to know what you have been through. Even if they did know, most people probably wouldn't care anyway. Some of you may get the medals you deserve, many more of you will not. But remember this, all of you are now members of the front-line club, and that is the most exclusive club in the world." - Lt. Col. Matthew Maer CO 1st Battalion, the Princess of Wale's Royal Regiment. Camp Abu Naji, Oct. 2004  To those in that club. |
| |
02-18-2005, 04:09 PM
|
#21 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 224
| The difference is in the induction sytem. Just because the P-51 had such a huge jump in performance was NOT because a Merlin simply was stuffed in there in place of an Allison.
Heres something I wrote a while back, its a bit long but it does explain the P-51 Allison/Merlin performance gap!!
"A lot has been written about the Merlin and the Allison, namely that the Merlin was a much more powerful engine. When in fact it was not! The Allison and the Merlin were both closely matched in displacement and at sea level and up to about 10000' they both had very similar power levels!!
Up higher than 10000' you MUST consider the induction system. Most Allison's like the ones in the P-39, P-40 and early P-51's had just a single stage supercharger. Most Merlin's like used in later P-51's, Spitfires and Lancasters had a two speed two stage supercharger. This makes a world of difference!!!
Once the Merlin got above a certain altitude the supercharger on the Merlin would shift into high blower. This greatly increases power at altitude... not because its a Merlin... but because you have more air!
The P-38 was an exception to the Allison's mentioned above. The reason was because it has a turbocharger feeding the Allison in addition to its own engine mounted single stage supercharger. This is a more flexible system than the two speed two stage setup could be. You can regulate the amount of turbo boost much more easily than you can with a two speed two stage supercharger. Using a turbo also provides a seamless level of power from sealevel all the way up to rated altitude.
This was not so with the two speed two stage supercharger used with the Merlin. As the aircraft got to a certain altitude the low blower speed would begin to lose power. Sometime at a little higher altitiude the supercharger would shift into high blower. This was a fairly violent operation, but because it did increase the speed of the blower you will make more power because your now getting more air.
Later Allisons used a two speed two stage supercharger and these could definatley run with a two speed two stage Merlin at high altitudes!
You also have to compare apples to apples here. There were different versions of each engine. For instance most Allisons had a single stage supercharger that in the case of the P-38 was supplemented by a turbocharger. While the P-51 and most Merlins used a two speed two stage supercharger.
However there were single stage Merlins out there too for instance the P-40F had a single stage two speed Merlin producing 1300hp takeoff while the Allison engined P-40K produced at the exact same time made 1325hp takeoff.
Thats the closest comparison between the two I know of. The induction was similar and for takeoff both were making close to the same numbers.
There were later versions of the Allison equipped with two speed two stage superchargers that made 1700hp at altitude, these were used in later versions of the P-82 Twin Mustang as well as the XP-51J . In contrast the Merlins with a two speed two stage supercharger used in the P-51B/C produced 1450hp and the P-51D made 1695hp at altitude.
The Germans used a different system than the Allies that was slightly superior to the two speed two stage supercharger but not as great as using a turbocharger. On DB 601s and 605s they used a single stage vairable speed supercharger. Speed was varied by a viscous coupling. So at low altitudes they could have a high slip and as altitude increased slip would be reduced to produce higher supercharger speeds for more power. This was a seamless operation for them as well!
So Ill say it again. It was NOT the Merlin in its self that was so great. It WAS the two speed two stage supercharger that made the Merlin so great.
This is a fact, if you can give ANY engine the amount of air it requires to make its rated power and can cool it effectively you can make its rated power at any realistic altitude!
The reason the Allison wasnt able to make its rated power at 30000' was because it couldnt get enough air. The Merlin could get enough air!
If the Allison could get the same amount of air as the Merlin at 30000' then Im sure today that the Merlin would seem much less mystical... it would just be another engine."
__________________ Fighter pilots make movies....
Bomber pilots make history! |
| |
02-18-2005, 05:55 PM
|
#22 | | Member
Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Jaxsonville FL
Posts: 43
| Yes I Agree Im only thirteen but the merlin was good at all altitudes but the allison was rocknrollen at low altitudes therfre not very good for escorts but good in low altitude dogfights.
__________________ I only regret that i only have one life to lose for my country "Nathan Hale" |
| |
02-18-2005, 09:11 PM
|
#23 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 224
| I don't think you read my post closely enough.
__________________ Fighter pilots make movies....
Bomber pilots make history! |
| |
02-18-2005, 09:50 PM
|
#24 | | Member
Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Jaxsonville FL
Posts: 43
| Dude I agree Those Bomber pilots and crews had some balls but sitting by yourself in a cockpit thinking how am I going to protect these guys.
Plus there is the fact that these bomber pilots have almost no gunnery (those machine guns have almost no effect due to theirlimited range of motion)  so it is in his hands
__________________ I only regret that i only have one life to lose for my country "Nathan Hale" |
| |
02-18-2005, 09:52 PM
|
#25 | | Member
Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Jaxsonville FL
Posts: 43
| Dude I agree Those Bomber pilots and crews had some balls but sitting by yourself in a cockpit thinking how am I going to protect these guys.
Plus there is the fact that these bomber pilots have almost no gunnery (those machine guns have almost no effect due to theirlimited range of motion)  so it is in his hands
__________________ I only regret that i only have one life to lose for my country "Nathan Hale" |
| |
02-19-2005, 07:25 AM
|
#26 | | Master of Ewes
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,959
Country: | dude if the engine can't even get enough air that's not a good engine............
__________________ 
"Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy." |
| |
02-19-2005, 09:11 AM
|
#27 | | Member
Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Jaxsonville FL
Posts: 43
| Look with the allison would make it a good tank buster and strafe component
__________________ I only regret that i only have one life to lose for my country "Nathan Hale" |
| |
02-19-2005, 09:49 AM
|
#28 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Saffron Walden/Sheffield
Posts: 3,001
Country: | The Allison is inline, not as tough as a radial engine which is needed for protection against flak at those low levels
__________________ 
When you realise that the light at the end of the tunnel is actually an oncoming train, you know it's time to run for your life |
| |
02-19-2005, 09:57 AM
|
#29 | | Member
Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Jaxsonville FL
Posts: 43
| Yeah it didnt have the horse power but that radial was prone to Breakage
The inline was easier to fix.
__________________ I only regret that i only have one life to lose for my country "Nathan Hale" |
| |
02-19-2005, 10:01 AM
|
#30 | | Member
Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Jaxsonville FL
Posts: 43
|
__________________ I only regret that i only have one life to lose for my country "Nathan Hale" |
| | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:03 AM. |  | |