 | Who help to identify this?| Aircraft Pictures Discuss Who help to identify this? in the World War II - Aviation forums; what's this?
http://i1.tinypic.com/402e4g0.jpg... |
|
01-10-2007, 07:12 AM
|
#1 | | Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 40
Country: | Who help to identify this? |
| |
01-10-2007, 01:11 PM
|
#2 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: NIAGARA
Posts: 4,397
Country: | 2 radials and 2 inline with massive undercarriage
__________________ |
| |
01-10-2007, 01:34 PM
|
#3 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 533
| Supermarine B.12/36 bomber Quote:
Following issue of Specification B.12/36 Mitchell submitted his tender in September 1936 for a four engined bomber. The plane was a single-spar, mid-wing monoplane, with swept back leading and straight trailing edges. Bombs could be carried in the fuselage as well as in the wings, reducing the overall size of the planes fuselage. Three possible engines were proposed (see below). The plans were accepted by the Air Ministry but unfortuanely the two prototypes, along with the detailed plans, were destroyed by the bombing of the Supermarine Works, Woolston in September 1940.
Type: Six crew bomber
Engines: Four either 1,100hp Rolls-Royce Merlin, or 1,330hp Bristol Hercules, or 1,100 Napier Dagger
Max speed: Either 345mph at 14,500ft, or 360mph at 18,000ft, or 325mph at 17,000ft respectively
Service ceiling: Either 30,000ft, or 33,000ft, or 30,000ft respectively
Range: 3,000 miles
Armament: Front, rear and retractable mid turret.
Bomb-carrying capacity: 21,000lbs
NB As these types never flew the above specifications are estimates.
| RJ Mitchell. A life in Aviation - Other Aircraft - From 1932 to 1937
__________________ Moose, according to one study, kill about 11 people a year. "They can kick in all four directions," warns a biologist with the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, "and move like Muhammad Ali." |
| |
01-10-2007, 05:16 PM
|
#4 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Kiwi Land
Posts: 848
Country: | And spec 12/36 gave birth to
Striling
Halifax
Manchester / Lancaster
__________________ 4 out of 5 voices in my head say I am normal. Majority rules.
You're just jealous because the voices only talk to me. |
| |
01-10-2007, 10:04 PM
|
#5 | | Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 40
Country: | Oh, yerh, it's unlucky, if the plan not was burned, Britian might has heavy bomber eralier. Thanks for your post |
| |
01-12-2007, 01:35 PM
|
#6 | | Banned
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 215
| Does that say IN THE WINGS? interesting, wonder why no one did that during ww2? sort of a semi-lifting body? |
| |
01-12-2007, 01:51 PM
|
#7 | | Master of Ewes
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,959
Country: | It was done on many occassions including with the Stirling or Halifax, can never remember which...........
and the Manchester/Lancaster and the H.P.56/Halifax come from specification B.13/36, not B.12/36.............
__________________ 
"Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy." |
| |
01-13-2007, 09:07 AM
|
#8 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Cardiff
Posts: 161
Country: | The idea of having the bombs within the wing structure would've been a dead end. It was thought that many small bombs would be the ideal load. What was needed was a cavernous bomb bay - to house big bombs. The Lancaster & Halifax were able to load the 4,000lb bomb and indeed the 'tallboy' & 'grand slam' penetration bombs, because the initial specification called for the option of carrying a torpedo!
Such was the need for 4,000 lb bomb carriers that the Mosquito was adapted to carry one. |
| |
01-13-2007, 12:16 PM
|
#9 | | Master of Ewes
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,959
Country: | plus of course fuel could no longer be carried in the wings so i can only assume it went in the fusilage? massive CoG problems as fuel is used during flight!
__________________ 
"Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy." |
| | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:32 AM. |  | |