Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums

Horton Brothers Flying Wings

Aircraft Requests Discuss Horton Brothers Flying Wings in the Aviation forums; Originally Posted by A4K The Northrop N-1M - seems to be the right wing form, although fueslage seems a bit ...


Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > World War II - Aviation > Aviation > Aircraft Requests

Reply
 
LinkBack (2) Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 06-12-2008, 07:18 AM   #121
IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
 
FLYBOYJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 13,227
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by A4K View Post

The Northrop N-1M - seems to be the right wing form, although fueslage seems a bit thin in your photo (maybe just the angle it's on?)
The N-1M was a well known aircraft in the US that was flying in the US before WW2.

Northrop N-1M - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
__________________
"IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT"
FLYBOYJ is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2008, 06:29 PM   #122
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,448
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by A4K View Post
Interesting picture Graeme! Looks like a Ho VII in inverted dive to me...what do you reckon..?
Quote:
Originally Posted by A4K View Post
Scrub my Ho VII comment - What do you reckon of this, Graeme?
The Northrop N-1M - seems to be the right wing form, although fueslage seems a bit thin in your photo (maybe just the angle it's on?)
Sorry Evan, my post was alcohol induced, I didn't intend for you to take me seriously. That photo has been around for years but become 'famous' around the time of the "Chariots of the Gods" release.

No I don't think its a Horten or a Northrop or an extra-terrestrial, but a staple mark, as explained in the site I posted...

"Not, it is not a "forgery", no, it is not a negative fault, neither something on the ground in the distance, and neither an extraterrestrial craft. It is the scratch mark caused by the staples that one put on the top right corner to hang it on a display panel, quite simply. That's why it's there in some prints, missing in another, that's why it "changes" with time."

Graeme is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2008, 07:00 AM   #123
A4K
Senior Member
 
A4K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,535
Country:
Nice one, Graeme ...so when the mention the 'missing paperclips' in regard to secret aircraft projects, they're actually talkng about 'staples', eh?!

..But seriously, folks...

Re the Horten IV and VI: (From ’the world’s vintage sailplanes 1908-45’ by Martin Simons, 1980)

...Two Horten 6s were built. In March 1945, with the American armies 40 km away, one was test flown against the Horten 4. It was established that the performance in straight flight was as much better than the ’4 as the ’4 was better than the orthodox types. The work had to stop as the americans soon over-ran Goettingen. One of the new aircraft was destroyed on the ground by the conquerors, as were most German sailplanes at this time. The other Horten 6 and parts of several other flying wings were taken to the USA to be studied at the Northrop factory. Two Horten 4s survived the war in flyable condition. One was flown by the British Air Force of Occupation gliding clubs until it was badly broken in a landing accident. The other was taken to England, where it was flown at Farnborough but badly damaged. After repairs it was sold to Hollis Button in the USA.

Although capable of good flights in expert hands, the Horten 4 seemed to fall short of expectations. In 1959 the sailplane was the subject of a thorough study by the Aerophysics Department of Mississippi State University under August Raspet. The results were reported to the OSTIV congress in 1960. The researchers found that the flying wing had a number of serious defects. The Hortens, when they heard of these results, were convinced that the controls of the aircraft tested had been incorrectly rigged. If so, this would account for the poor results Raspets team obtained.

The Horten 4 in the USA was still extant in 1980 (time of writing). The aircraft including the Horten 6, sent to Northrops, were re-discovered in crated condition in the Smithsonian Institution’s store in 1977, and will probably be preserved.

Horten 4, 1941: Span, 20.00 m. Wing area, 19.1 sq m. Aspect ratio, 21. Flying weight , 350 kg. Wing loading, 18.3 kg/ sq m.

Horten 6, 1945: Span, 24.20 m. Wing area, 17.75 sq m. Aspect ratio, 33. flying weight, 425 kg. Wing loading, 23.9 kg/ sq m.

(Photo caption mentions that ’so far as is known, the H6 never flew in the USA’)


Existing Horten-Aircraft (From ’Flug Revue’, September 1999)

Type / Werknr. / Location
H II 2 Muzeum Lotnictwa Polskiego, Krakau (components)
H II L 6 Deutsches Technikmuseum, Berlin
H III f 32 National Air & Space Museum, Washington D.C.
H III h 31 Deutsches Technikmuseum, Berlin
H IV 26 Deutsches Museum, Flugwerft Schleissheim
H IV a 25 Planes of Fame Museum, Chino, USA
H VI V2 34 National Air & Space Museum, Washington D.C.
H IX V3 40 National Air & Space Museum, Silver Hill, USA
A4K is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2008, 01:56 PM   #124
Member
 
Dragonsinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 79
Country:
Send a message via MSN to Dragonsinger
Comments on reading through this thread.

Hi Guys
Just read my way through the thread and one or two things flag themselves up to me.
First I must say that I have no real disagreements with the posts and I only picked up the thread from an interest in unusual designs.

Flag one. A great deal seems to be made about the stability of the smaller Horten wings. Well how many pilots would expect a high performance glider or fighter to be stable? Instability equals agility in a fighter. Yes it must be controllable but a stable fighter is slow to react can't turn or manoeuvre rapidly and so is an easy target.

Second flag. The Horten brothers large wing never really got out of development, in fact none of their designs did, but they showed enough promise to be carted off by the allies for further study.

Third flag. Governments do not need reasons to classify things and keep them under wraps. It is considered a good enough reason to try to hide something which will make the current government look bad and to keep previous government cook ups quiet in case they reveal yours next time they get in and to admit that Germany had aircraft designs which appeared superior to the allies would never have been countenanced directly after the war and at the beginning of the "Cold War" when Russia could have gained a possible advantage by studying them.

Fourth flag. Airfix produced a "Futuristic fighter aircraft design" which had the design features and was actually not too far off the F117 in concept and shape but looked smoother since current ideas on aerodynamics had not accepted the angular shape of the stealth aircraft as viable.

Final flag. Computer flying is not infallible. Check out the Paris airshow where the Airbus prototype crashed. It does not actually crash. It simply flies into the trees because the pilot and flight engineer are screaming at the computer to give them full power and the computer responds by saying that full power in the dirty configuration (Full slots, slats, flaps and gear down) will strain the airframe.

Yes I know that things have improved since then but how many more little gems like that one are waiting to be discovered? Sounds remarkably like an incident recently where an airliner failed to make the end of the runway because there was no throttle response. There is total deniability that this was a computer cook up since this will ground god knows how many aircraft.

Sorry for the Rant
Dragonsinger
Dragonsinger is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2008, 02:39 PM   #125
Senior Member
 
SoD Stitch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Pine Mountain Lake, California
Posts: 752
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Henk View Post
I wrote to a magazine here in South Africa (WORLD AIRNEWS ) about the Horten 229 V3, but they made misstakes and just pissed me off so I told them, but ag ja they claimed that their info were correct. The response on that article were enormous and some even said that it should be brought to SA and restored here.

Here is a link to the magazine's website.

http://www.airnews.co.za/pages.php?page=default

Horten 18 America Bomber Part 5

This comes from Luft 46.









Henk
Yes, great stuff, Henk; I always liked the Ho 229, and thought it was years (decades?) ahead of it's time. It's amazing to think that the Germans almost built the B-2 50 years earlier! Looks just like a B-2 from the rear . . . . .
__________________
SoD Stitch is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2008, 09:56 PM   #126
Senior Member
 
Trebor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 351
Country:
Send a message via ICQ to Trebor Send a message via AIM to Trebor Send a message via MSN to Trebor Send a message via Yahoo to Trebor
wow! that's simply an amazing piece of aviation! I'd gladly build a model of that! =D

right now I'm building the 1:72 Revell Germany Horten Go 229. it's a lot of fun! 8D
__________________
THANKS NJACO FOR THE SIG PIC!!
Southern Comfort III of the 8th Air Force, 44th Bombardment Group.

Captain George R. Insley (pilot) commanding, Rudolph Jandreau Engineer/top turret gunner
Trebor is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2008, 05:25 AM   #127
Senior Member
 
Henk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: George - South Africa
Posts: 2,605
Country:
Send a message via MSN to Henk
Thanks SoD Stitch, I love to share what I have.

I would just love to go and see the real thing one day. Boeing is now working on a flying wing with NASA and it is looking good so far.
__________________


The ultimate revolution in aircraft designs during WW2
Henk is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2008, 10:36 AM   #128
Senior Member
 
Trebor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 351
Country:
Send a message via ICQ to Trebor Send a message via AIM to Trebor Send a message via MSN to Trebor Send a message via Yahoo to Trebor
I'd love to go see the real thing at the NASM. but I hear it's not on public display anymore I wonder why? are they finally gonna restore it?
__________________
THANKS NJACO FOR THE SIG PIC!!
Southern Comfort III of the 8th Air Force, 44th Bombardment Group.

Captain George R. Insley (pilot) commanding, Rudolph Jandreau Engineer/top turret gunner
Trebor is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2008, 02:52 PM   #129
Senior Member
 
SoD Stitch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Pine Mountain Lake, California
Posts: 752
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trebor View Post
I'd love to go see the real thing at the NASM. but I hear it's not on public display anymore I wonder why? are they finally gonna restore it?
Go back and read p. 1, post #10; Henk mentions that the SASM is planning on restoring the one Go/Ho 229 they have in storage at the Steven F. Udvar-Hazy Center, but I'm sure it will be several years before it is put on display, if not more. There are several other projects that are taking priority over the Go/Ho 229 at the moment.
__________________
SoD Stitch is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2008, 04:13 PM   #130
Senior Member
 
Trebor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 351
Country:
Send a message via ICQ to Trebor Send a message via AIM to Trebor Send a message via MSN to Trebor Send a message via Yahoo to Trebor
oh, well if I had the knowledge, I'd totally volunteer to restore the Ho-229.
__________________
THANKS NJACO FOR THE SIG PIC!!
Southern Comfort III of the 8th Air Force, 44th Bombardment Group.

Captain George R. Insley (pilot) commanding, Rudolph Jandreau Engineer/top turret gunner
Trebor is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2008, 06:51 PM   #131
IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
 
FLYBOYJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 13,227
Country:
Just catching up - a few comments....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragonsinger View Post
Third flag. Governments do not need reasons to classify things and keep them under wraps. It is considered a good enough reason to try to hide something which will make the current government look bad and to keep previous government cook ups quiet in case they reveal yours next time they get in and to admit that Germany had aircraft designs which appeared superior to the allies would never have been countenanced directly after the war and at the beginning of the "Cold War" when Russia could have gained a possible advantage by studying them.
The US had no reason to cover up flying any captured German aircraft, if anything the propaganda gods at the time would of put out word that the "Nazi" aircraft was inferior.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragonsinger View Post
Fourth flag. Airfix produced a "Futuristic fighter aircraft design" which had the design features and was actually not too far off the F117 in concept and shape but looked smoother since current ideas on aerodynamics had not accepted the angular shape of the stealth aircraft as viable.
Dragon - a few other model manufacturers put out similar models - "The F-19" as it was first touted - they looked nothing like the F-117 and gave no concept how the aircraft's stealth capability really worked. When I worked for Lockheed during the early 1980s we would scoff at those models and even burnt a few of them in effigy during tailgate parties in the parking lot of the old Burbank plant after work hours....
__________________
"IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT"
FLYBOYJ is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2008, 04:00 AM   #132
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Queensland
Posts: 1,256
Country:
Actually there is a model of the Mig-37 Ferret E I think it was which was meant to represent Soviet Stealth Aircraft Approach which does bear a very good similarity to the F-117 Stealth Fighter. You should type the name in and look at what you come up with...
__________________
http://www.ww2aircraft.net/forum/alb...500&ppuser=671

Link To My Picture Gallery
HealzDevo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2008, 06:19 AM   #133
IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
 
FLYBOYJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 13,227
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by HealzDevo View Post
Actually there is a model of the Mig-37 Ferret E I think it was which was meant to represent Soviet Stealth Aircraft Approach which does bear a very good similarity to the F-117 Stealth Fighter. You should type the name in and look at what you come up with...
I'm totally aware of this other fairy tale and again it's nothing like an F-117 except it has a "V" tail - more fictional nonsense



__________________
"IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT"
FLYBOYJ is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2008, 09:07 PM   #134
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Queensland
Posts: 1,256
Country:
Okay, but you have to admit it looks a heck of a lot closer than the F-119 model did. It actually looks like those reasonable models of an aircraft that are released by some artists before true details of an aircraft become available...
__________________
http://www.ww2aircraft.net/forum/alb...500&ppuser=671

Link To My Picture Gallery
HealzDevo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2008, 09:19 PM   #135
IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
 
FLYBOYJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 13,227
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by HealzDevo View Post
Okay, but you have to admit it looks a heck of a lot closer than the F-119 model did. It actually looks like those reasonable models of an aircraft that are released by some artists before true details of an aircraft become available...
It's closer than the F-19 model but still a joke - look at the air intake - it was believed by some wannabe aviation analysts that you have to shrink the air intakes - jet engines need air!!!!! Look at that great big speed brake - what you think will happen when its opened!!!!! I could go on and on....

These were derived from some one's imagination from the 1980s. Although interesting they should NOT be taken as gospel because those who came up with them didn't have a clue about the real deal.
__________________
"IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT"
FLYBOYJ is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.ww2aircraft.net/forum/aircraft-requests/horton-brothers-flying-wings-3618.html
Posted By For Type Date
Ho-229. - Africa Aviation / Afrika Lugvaart This thread Refback 11-18-2006 03:22 AM
Flugzeug bei This thread Refback 10-17-2006 02:40 PM

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Air War's Greatest Aces... lesofprimus Stories 14 10-09-2006 12:45 PM</