ADS NOT DISPLAYED TO REGISTERED USERS.
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 35
Like Tree1Likes

Obscure 109's

Aircraft Requests Discuss Obscure 109's in the Aviation forums; i know these requests have probably been asked before, but after reading them i still need help with three variants ...

  1. #1
    Senior Member Sagittario64's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    291
    Country
    United States

    Obscure 109's

    i know these requests have probably been asked before, but after reading them i still need help with three variants
    first is the Bf.109H. the information i find is sketchy, scattered, and is lacking some critical data
    if anyone has performance data for the Bf.109H-0/-1, and especially any hint of production/conversion numbers(with sources of the information), i would be grateful
    also if anyone knows anything about a Bf.109W, which i have been lead to believe is a floatplane, id be grateful for information about that too.
    lastly, the Bf.109K-14, of which 2 are purported to show up in II./JG52's registry, has been doubted to have even existed. was the names in the registries just typos, or were they actually K-14s?


  2. #2
    The Pop-Tart Whisperer Njaco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Southern New Jersey
    Posts
    19,348
    Country
    United States


    "If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it's English, thank a soldier!"


    http://www.njcacoa.org/

    http://www.facebook.com/ShaydsOfGray


  3. #3
    Senior Member herman1rg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    687
    Country
    United Kingdom
    6 minute response time, that's slow LOL

  4. #4
    Siggy Master Wurger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    27,569
    Country
    Poland
    I found something like that for the Bf109K-14

    K-14 based on: Bf 109 K-4
    alterations:
    - changed armament
    - changed engine
    - 4-blade-propeller
    purpose: fighter
    wing span: 32,5 ft (9,92 m)
    length: 29 ft (8,85 m)
    height: 8 ft (2,59 m)
    aerodynamic area: 16,4 m˛
    weight: 7438 pound (3374 kg)
    speed maximum: 453 mph (730 km/h)
    service ceiling: 41.000 ft (12.500 m)
    engine: Daimler-Benz 605 L (1750 PS) with mechanic 2-stage supercharger
    range: 297 nm (550 km)
    equipment:
    - 4-blade-propeller
    - MW 50 equipment
    - "Erla-Canopy"
    armament: 2 x 13 mm MG 131 (above the engine) 3 x 30 mm MK 108 (one fireing through the spinner, one in each wing)
    radio equipment: FuG 16 ZY
    further comments: - last known Bf 109 construction - no serial production


    A propable appearance....


    Last edited by Wurger; 01-03-2012 at 05:38 PM.



  5. #5
    Siggy Master Wurger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    27,569
    Country
    Poland
    The Bf 109W (Wasserflugzeug - Seaplane) was a projekt only and never actually made up during the war.

  6. #6
    The Pop-Tart Whisperer Njaco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Southern New Jersey
    Posts
    19,348
    Country
    United States
    Quote Originally Posted by Wurger View Post
    The Bf 109W (Wasserflugzeug - Seaplane) was a projekt only and never actually made up during the war.
    Wurger, would this be it or not?
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Obscure 109's-me109-170f.jpg  


    "If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it's English, thank a soldier!"


    http://www.njcacoa.org/

    http://www.facebook.com/ShaydsOfGray


  7. #7
    Siggy Master Wurger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    27,569
    Country
    Poland
    No Mate, I'm afraid. The picture shows Bf 109E-4 with a ski under-carriage ( schneekufen ) that was tested during a trial in January 1941. The plane was crashed after 80 test-flights. After the accident the project was abandoned and never continued.

    Regarding the Bf 109K-14 in II./JG52..... the info is untrue rather because no one of the K-14 variant of Messerschmitt was built by the war ending. It is more likely that the unit got two Bf 109K-4s with a two-speed mechanical superchager that was foreseen for DB 605L engine

  8. #8
    The Pop-Tart Whisperer Njaco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Southern New Jersey
    Posts
    19,348
    Country
    United States
    Thanks! I thought it was a modified and not a special Mk 109.


    "If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it's English, thank a soldier!"


    http://www.njcacoa.org/

    http://www.facebook.com/ShaydsOfGray


  9. #9
    Siggy Master Wurger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    27,569
    Country
    Poland
    You'r welcome. It seems that it is more likely the variant was the E-8. It can be indicated by these pylon detents under her fuselage and the lack of bulged hatches for wing cannons.

    Obscure 109's-bf109e4-na-nartach.jpg

    And here the possible view of the Bf 109W

    Obscure 109's-bf109-na-polywakach.jpg

  10. #10
    The Pop-Tart Whisperer Njaco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Southern New Jersey
    Posts
    19,348
    Country
    United States
    Excellent!


    "If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it's English, thank a soldier!"


    http://www.njcacoa.org/

    http://www.facebook.com/ShaydsOfGray


  11. #11
    Senior Member Sagittario64's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    291
    Country
    United States
    What was the point of the W model? fighter floatplane in europe? doesnt seem to have much of an advantage to me unless it was intended for operations in norway with its fjords

  12. #12
    Senior Member Sagittario64's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    291
    Country
    United States
    and with the well known meticulousness of wwii german records of manufacture and information depositories, how is it that no one knows for certain how many H models were produced? even so, uncertain numbers also often have numbered estimates, but the H model is confusing. i havent seen one number, only "limited production" and "small numbers". a small number could be anything. a small number could be anywhere from 1 to 200. especially considering that 12,000 G-6s alone were produced, compared to that, 200 still seems pretty small. even 500 seems relatively small compared to production numbers above 1,000.

  13. #13
    Siggy Master Wurger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    27,569
    Country
    Poland
    Quote Originally Posted by Sagittario64 View Post
    What was the point of the W model? fighter floatplane in europe? doesnt seem to have much of an advantage to me unless it was intended for operations in norway with its fjords
    I'm not sure if there was any particular reason for that. Just they considered a such equipment for Bf109. Also a such idea was tested with Spitfire.
    And why do you think that the Norway with its fjords could be taken into consideration for operations only? You have forgotten that Nazi German took control over The Baltic Sea, The North Sea, the Mediterranean Sea ( to a certain extent of course ) and a part of the Atlantic Ocean . So it would be possible to use the plane in every water reservoir that would be larger than a puddle.

  14. #14
    The Pop-Tart Whisperer Njaco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Southern New Jersey
    Posts
    19,348
    Country
    United States
    Quote Originally Posted by Sagittario64 View Post
    and with the well known meticulousness of wwii german records of manufacture and information depositories, how is it that no one knows for certain how many H models were produced? even so, uncertain numbers also often have numbered estimates, but the H model is confusing. i havent seen one number, only "limited production" and "small numbers". a small number could be anything. a small number could be anywhere from 1 to 200. especially considering that 12,000 G-6s alone were produced, compared to that, 200 still seems pretty small. even 500 seems relatively small compared to production numbers above 1,000.
    Because even those meticulous records were destroyed during the last months of the war hence sometimes there are no numbers.


    "If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it's English, thank a soldier!"


    http://www.njcacoa.org/

    http://www.facebook.com/ShaydsOfGray


  15. #15
    Senior Member GrauGeist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Redding, California
    Posts
    6,677
    Country
    United States
    perhaps the Floatplane version was meant to replace the Ar196 for service aboard capitol ships?

    "Look back over the past, with its changing empires that rose and fell, and you can foresee the future."
    - Marcus Aurelius, Emperor of Rome


    > I Support Doug Gilliss <

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 59
    Last Post: 01-31-2013, 07:07 PM
  2. Best WWII Air-Force
    By Desert Fox in forum Polls
    Replies: 890
    Last Post: 04-01-2011, 08:01 AM
  3. Allied tests of captured Bf-109's
    By Soren in forum Polls
    Replies: 121
    Last Post: 05-21-2008, 11:36 PM
  4. Best WWII fighter pilot....?
    By Lucky13 in forum Polls
    Replies: 189
    Last Post: 04-27-2008, 06:00 PM
  5. Most Accurate War Film
    By Njaco in forum OFF-Topic / Misc.
    Replies: 204
    Last Post: 05-31-2007, 11:50 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86