Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums

What plane flew the highest during WW2?

Aircraft Requests Discuss What plane flew the highest during WW2? in the Aviation forums; I have read that the JU86 was made into a high altitude plane to fly over England and Africa with ...


Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > World War II - Aviation > Aviation > Aircraft Requests

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 10-04-2005, 12:33 AM   #1
Member
 
RAGMAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: B.C.
Posts: 61
What plane flew the highest during WW2?

I have read that the JU86 was made into a high altitude plane to fly over England and Africa with little fear of interception,until the Spitfire was modified to fly at the same height as the JU86.I have read that some planes flew higher than 45000 ft but I do not remember the plane(s) as I read them when I was kid.Anyone know what planes (if any)flew 40000+ ft on regular basis?
__________________
sorry I'm a newbie
RAGMAN is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2005, 11:48 AM   #2
Konfused with a 'K'
 
cheddar cheese's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Turin, Italy
Posts: 20,412
Country:
Send a message via AIM to cheddar cheese Send a message via MSN to cheddar cheese
A fair few planes could aquire - 40,000ft The ones that spring to mind are late Spitfires, P-51D's, P-38's, P-47D's, Ta-152's...There are more...
__________________

with my one last gaping breath id apologise for bleeding on your shirt...
cheddar cheese is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2005, 04:51 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
DaveB.inVa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 224
Ive read of the Ju-86 P and R versions making it over 50k.

In May 1946 the USAAF set a couple records. First was General Jimmy Doolittle's B-29B named The Challenger carried a 24,200 lb load to 41,561 feet.

Later that month General Frank Armstrong's personal B-29 named Fluffy Fuzz IV (with Major Ross as AC) carried a 2,200 lb load to 47,910 feet. This was set as an official record and it still stands. A guy named Bohannon has tried a couple times to beat the record in a modified RV-4 but he hasn't made it as of yet.
__________________
Fighter pilots make movies....
Bomber pilots make history!
DaveB.inVa is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2005, 11:43 PM   #4
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Snohomish Washinton
Posts: 34
the mosquito is my first guess, though I speak out of much inexperience.
Wasnt it one of the first planes to have pressurized cabins?
The Nerd is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2005, 10:35 AM   #5
Konfused with a 'K'
 
cheddar cheese's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Turin, Italy
Posts: 20,412
Country:
Send a message via AIM to cheddar cheese Send a message via MSN to cheddar cheese
If any Mossies flew above 40,000ft it would be the PR versions, nd even then there would be lpanes that flew higher. Dont know about the pressurized cabin part.
__________________

with my one last gaping breath id apologise for bleeding on your shirt...
cheddar cheese is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2005, 12:51 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
DaveB.inVa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 224
Being first is claimed by Lockheed with the XC-35 Electra in 1935. Soon thereafter came the Boeing 307 Stratoliner in 1940 (basically a B-17 with a different fuselage) as the first pressurized passenger liner.

Editied to add link: http://www.nasm.si.edu/research/aero...kheed_xc35.htm
__________________
Fighter pilots make movies....
Bomber pilots make history!
DaveB.inVa is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2005, 04:10 PM   #7
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sault Sainte Marie, MI
Posts: 17
Send a message via AIM to kleinnak Send a message via MSN to kleinnak Send a message via Yahoo to kleinnak
I can't say at this exact moment, I'll have to do some reading when i get home from work, but i know the highest combat recorded was flown by Emaneul Galatzine (sp?) of the RAF in a stripped down Spitfire Mk IX against a Ju 86R/P (?) which i believe was at a height of either near or above 45000 feet. Again I don't recall exactly, I'll need to do some reading up when i get home, but i do know that was the highest recorded combat of the war. as for the mosquito, pressurization i couldn't say, but there are numerous stories i've read about of the photo-recon versions being able to fly high enough and fast enough to out-pace Me 262s that were sent to intercept them.
__________________
"Success in aerial combat is one third luck, one third the skill to use that luck, and one third the drive the send the other bastard straight to hell."
kleinnak is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2005, 05:09 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Japan
Posts: 450
That was actually a stripped down Mk V.

Ju-86Ps (with deisel engines ) were doing photo recon over Egypt with impunity. The RAF decided something needed to be done about it.

Initially they sent some high altitude Spitfire VI. However, the Mk VI had a heavy pressure cabin and couldn't get high enough.

The next step was to convert 3 Mk V airframes. No 103 MU at Aboukir stripped out all unnecessary equipment, armour and the .303s. The aircraft were fitted with 4 bladed propellors taken from the Spitfire VIs and the compression ratios on their superchargers were altered to give more power at high altitude. Long span pointed wingtips were fitted and the 20mms were replanced with .50cals, with about 150 rpg.

One of these modified Spitfire Mk Vs made an interception on 24 August, 1942 initially at 37,000 feet and climbing to 42,000 feet. The Ju-86 was damaged but returned to base.

The Spitfires underwent further modifications to give them better performance. One of the fuel tanks was removed, new leightweight batteries were installed and all radio equioment including masts and mounting brackets, were removed. The Spitfires formed a 'Striker' and 'Marker' combat pair, with the stripped Spitfire acting as the attacking aircraft. On August 29 they intercepted a Ju-86P at 45,000 feet and damaged it so badly that it crashed into the Meditteranean
Jabberwocky is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2005, 05:59 PM   #9
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sault Sainte Marie, MI
Posts: 17
Send a message via AIM to kleinnak Send a message via MSN to kleinnak Send a message via Yahoo to kleinnak
hate to break it to you chief, but the plane Galitzine flew was a mk IX, No. 103 Sqn DID use stripped down mk Vs in the middle east, but Galatzine flew in the UK with the Special Service Flight (Or High Altitude Flight in the PC age) out of Northolt against the high-flying ju 86p/r's. he did indeed intercept at ju 86r, though did not shoot it down as his left cannon jammed as soon as he opened fire, at an altitude of approximately 44000 feet. his plane had the four .303s removed but still had the two 20mms. Do a search for Pilot Officer Emanuel Galitzine or read Aircraft of the Aces No. 5: Late Marque Spitfire Aces 1942-1945, every source will tell you he flew a stripped down mk IX. I can even tell you the serial number of the plane he flew, which was originally mislabeled as BF273 but later corrected to be BS273, which can be read at http://www.avhistory.org/scripts/Dow...tats_Top20.asp. really not attacking you, just saying, yes, he did fly a mk IX, and that you are right about the Mk Vs with No. 103.
__________________
"Success in aerial combat is one third luck, one third the skill to use that luck, and one third the drive the send the other bastard straight to hell."
kleinnak is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2005, 06:08 PM   #10
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sault Sainte Marie, MI
Posts: 17
Send a message via AIM to kleinnak Send a message via MSN to kleinnak Send a message via Yahoo to kleinnak
*side note* Galitzine also made his flight on September 12, 1944, when access to the Mk IX (an all around better aircraft) was far more available than the Mk V which had been largely phased out of service as a frontline fighter except for the LF.Mk V version, which rated for low level would have a rather difficult time catching a plane at 44000 feet. This also was over 2 years after the flights made by No. 103 Sqn, and when combat in Egypt was rather over.
__________________
"Success in aerial combat is one third luck, one third the skill to use that luck, and one third the drive the send the other bastard straight to hell."
kleinnak is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2005, 02:03 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
helmitsmit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 207
I'm sure the the Spitfire PR mk 19 made 60,000ft? I read it in a book although it might not have been during ww2.
helmitsmit is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2005, 07:33 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
mosquitoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Saffron Walden/Sheffield
Posts: 3,001
Country:
Send a message via MSN to mosquitoman
Mossies went to about 45000 feet I think and yes they did have pressurised cabins
__________________

When you realise that the light at the end of the tunnel is actually an oncoming train, you know it's time to run for your life
mosquitoman is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2005, 07:57 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
syscom3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 7,579
Quote:
Originally Posted by helmitsmit
I'm sure the the Spitfire PR mk 19 made 60,000ft? I read it in a book although it might not have been during ww2.
If it was that high, he would have needed a pressurized cabin, or a pressure suit.
__________________
"Pilot to copilot..... what are those mountain goats doing up here in the clouds?"
syscom3 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2005, 08:05 AM   #14
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Japan
Posts: 450
Quote:
Originally Posted by kleinnak
hate to break it to you chief, but the plane Galitzine flew was a mk IX, No. 103 Sqn DID use stripped down mk Vs in the middle east, but Galatzine flew in the UK with the Special Service Flight (Or High Altitude Flight in the PC age) out of Northolt against the high-flying ju 86p/r's. he did indeed intercept at ju 86r, though did not shoot it down as his left cannon jammed as soon as he opened fire, at an altitude of approximately 44000 feet. his plane had the four .303s removed but still had the two 20mms. Do a search for Pilot Officer Emanuel Galitzine or read Aircraft of the Aces No. 5: Late Marque Spitfire Aces 1942-1945, every source will tell you he flew a stripped down mk IX. I can even tell you the serial number of the plane he flew, which was originally mislabeled as BF273 but later corrected to be BS273, which can be read at http://www.avhistory.org/scripts/Dow...tats_Top20.asp. really not attacking you, just saying, yes, he did fly a mk IX, and that you are right about the Mk Vs with No. 103.
We are both mixing our stories. I have both "Late Marque Spitfre Aces" and "Spitfire Mark V Aces", both by Dr. Alfred Price, and yes, Galitzine did intercept a Ju-86P at 44,000 feet. I didn't claim that he didn't,

HOWEVER,

My anecdote refers not to operations over the UK in 1944, but operations over Egypt in 1942 with No 145 Sqn. It doesn't refer to Mk IX Spitfires but modified Mk V Spitfires. If you check the book you referenced you will note on page 15 that the Mk IX first began operations in the Mediterranean with No 81 Sqn on January 31, 1943. The unit wasn't No 103 Squadron, but it was modified by No 103 Maintenece Unit (MU). No 103 Squadron flew Wellingtons, Halifaxes, and Lancasters from Elsham Wolds in England.

Pilot Officer George Glenders is credited with the kill of a Ju-86P at 42,000 feet, for the first intercept of a Ju-86P. He also made one intercept at 45,000 feet in a further modified Mk V but it didn't result in a kill, just a damaged claim. The RAF online history section goes on to say that; "Subsequently, Ju-86Ps were intercepted and brought down from heights of 45,000 and 50,000 feet" Which is ambigous enough to encompase all high altitude Spitfire operations from that point until the end of the war.



The highest official flight ceiling for a PR Spitfire was 46,500 feet in the pressurised PR. X with the specalised Merlin 77. They could, and did, go higher, but it really wasn't necessary. Above 40,000 feet they were safe from interception by anything apart from jets or the Ta-152H. Given a max cruise ( 1 hour continious) of 395 mph + at 31,000 feet they would of been difficult to catch. Even a 190K needs about 7-8 minutes to get up to this altitude. In that time the Spitfire has done close to 50 miles.
Jabberwocky is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2005, 04:27 PM   #15
Senior Member
 
helmitsmit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 207
The Spitfire mk 19 did have a pressurized cabin (much better than the mk10, that is why there was a mark 11). I was also the mk19 that, on the spitfire last operational sortie, tried to break the sound barrier in a dive.
helmitsmit is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
   

AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com Avitop.com


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82