 | WHat was a better Paratrooper transport of WWII?| Aviation Videos Discuss WHat was a better Paratrooper transport of WWII? in the World War II - Aviation forums; WHat transport was best of WWII? Was it the C-47 or Ju-52. I know the Ju-52 had ... |
|
01-01-2008, 10:40 AM
|
#1 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Tewksbury, New Jersey
Posts: 1,368
Country: | WHat was a better Paratrooper transport of WWII? WHat transport was best of WWII? Was it the C-47 or Ju-52. I know the Ju-52 had some defensive armament but never really did it fight its way into a target like C-47's did towards the end of the war. If you guys could, could you basee it off, 10 points being the best and like, Durability, carrying capacity, Speed, armament, stuff like that i would just like to see what you guys think and thank you! |
| |
01-01-2008, 11:00 AM
|
#2 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: NIAGARA
Posts: 4,746
Country: | I would think the JU 52 had much more combat flying then the C47
__________________ |
| |
01-01-2008, 11:05 AM
|
#3 | | Minister of Whoopass
Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Long Island Native in Mississippi
Posts: 13,270
Country: | C47...
__________________ "After That Second Kill, I Knew It Was Time To Get The Hell Outta There..."
-- Lt. William Northrop Case
To See My IL2 Sturmovik Video Tribute to My Grandfather, Click Here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HtzN5RuNNJk |
| |
01-01-2008, 11:07 AM
|
#4 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 8,417
| C47's by a huge margin. The C47 simply had the range, payload, speed and strength that the JU didnt have.
__________________ "Pilot to copilot..... what are those mountain goats doing up here in the clouds?" |
| |
01-01-2008, 11:10 AM
|
#5 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Tewksbury, New Jersey
Posts: 1,368
Country: | Thanks guys! |
| |
01-01-2008, 11:19 AM
|
#6 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Jersey Shore
Posts: 2,209
Country: | The greatest aircraft of WW II gets the nod....the C-47.
TO
__________________ “Let's get Enterprise and Hornet turned into the wind." |
| |
01-01-2008, 11:31 AM
|
#7 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: British Columbia
Posts: 1,874
Country: | Did either side ever use bomber aircraft to transport troops or supplies? Or was it not practical?
__________________ |
| |
01-01-2008, 11:36 AM
|
#8 | | "Shooter"
Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Moorpark, CA
Posts: 12,823
Country: | B-17s and B-24s were used to drop supplies, but they weren't fitted with enough seats to drop paratroopers.
__________________ http://www.vg-photo.com Wherever their bones may lie, the courage of heroes is consecrated in the hearts and engraved in the history of the free. Lt Col Honner DSO MC, 39th Commander speaking of the dead from the battle of Kokoda. |
| |
01-01-2008, 11:37 AM
|
#9 | | World Traveler
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Royal Deeside/St Andrews, Scotland, UK
Posts: 11,694
Country: | The British used the Halifax as a paratroop aircraft and sometimes to drop supplies as well. As for the best it has to be the C-47.
__________________ "Success is not Final, Failure is not Fatal, it is the Courage to Continue that Counts"
Sir Winston Churchill "To him the People of the World Largely owe the Freedom and Liberties they Enjoy Today"
Enscription on Hugh Dowding's (AOC Fighter Command 1936-40) statue in London Moderator WW2 Talk: A WW2 Discussion Forum My Photo Collections on Flickr |
| |
01-01-2008, 11:39 AM
|
#10 | | IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 13,512
Country: | When considering the "whole picture," the C-47 hands down.
__________________ "IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT" |
| |
01-01-2008, 11:48 AM
|
#11 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Tewksbury, New Jersey
Posts: 1,368
Country: | I think the SHort Stirling was converted from a bomber but i am not positive. |
| |
01-01-2008, 12:03 PM
|
#12 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: oregon
Posts: 2,477
Country: | Quote:
Originally Posted by pbfoot I would think the JU 52 had much more combat flying then the C47 | PB - with due respect I wonder how you measure 'combat time'?
If elapsed time from first flight you are dead on 1930-1945 as the first flight of DC-3/C-47 was five years later... but combat time? - if you go by sorties the 47 wins by a huge margin as so many more were produced and operated in every theatre of the war... and several wars afterward to compound the service.
Number of Airborne Ops? of size equal to or greater than a Battalion? C-47 by huge margin. Ju-52 - Crete.. but what else? Just for 82nd AB at Regiment size and above, North Africa, Sicily, Salerno, Normandy, Nijmegen, Rhine - then look to Puking Buzzard drops (formally Ft Campbell's school for refined ladies), Dragoon/Riviera - and then on to the Pacific - just for US drops.
Speed, trooper load capacity, cargo? - huge margin to 47. Wikipedia not always reliable but accurate in these comparisons.
The Ju 52 flew first, was occasionally used as a bomber and had some defensive armament - but the defense was worthless against flak or fighters so why bother?
I think my vote stays with the Gooney Bird. |
| |
01-01-2008, 12:07 PM
|
#13 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: oregon
Posts: 2,477
Country: | Quote:
Originally Posted by evangilder B-17s and B-24s were used to drop supplies, but they weren't fitted with enough seats to drop paratroopers. | The Carpetbagger B-24s were used to drop Jedburgh/OSS at long range in onesy/twosey numbers but not exactly airborne equipped. Halifax and Lanc did same thing. Wouldn't be suprised if He 177 also used same way but I am not sure of any instance. |
| |
01-01-2008, 12:10 PM
|
#14 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Tewksbury, New Jersey
Posts: 1,368
Country: | THe He-177 couldn't it was cramped in there and its fuselage had many teething problems and Hitler said it was too dangerous........ |
| |
01-01-2008, 12:19 PM
|
#15 | | IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 13,512
Country: | Quote:
Originally Posted by drgondog The Ju 52 flew first, was occasionally used as a bomber and had some defensive armament - but the defense was worthless against flak or fighters so why bother? | "The 57th FG was the main unit involved in the "Palm Sunday Massacre", of 18 April 1943. De-coded Ultra signals had given away a plan for a large formation of German Junkers Ju 52 transport planes to cross the Mediterranean, escorted by Bf 109s. An ambush was planned, using three squadrons of the 57th, a P-40 squadron from the 324th FG and a small group of Desert Air Force Spitfires. They intercepted the German formation and shot down at least 70 planes, with only six or seven Allied airplanes being downed."
__________________ "IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT" |
| | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:13 AM. |  | |