Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums

100/150 usage in the USAAF

Aviation Discuss 100/150 usage in the USAAF in the World War II - Aviation forums; Anyone have info on this fuel grade usage, especially when used in the P-38?...


Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > World War II - Aviation > Aviation

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 08-31-2005, 06:55 AM   #1
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 795
100/150 usage in the USAAF

Anyone have info on this fuel grade usage, especially when used in the P-38?
KraziKanuK is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2005, 09:07 AM   #2
IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
 
FLYBOYJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 13,004
Country:
I believe you mean 100/130?

In the past, there were many different grades of aviation gasoline in general use e.g. 80/87, 91/96, 100/130,108/135 and 115/145. However, with decreasing demand these have been rationalised down to one principle grade, Avgas 100/130. (To avoid confusion and to attempt to eliminate errors in handling aviation gasoline, it is common practice to designate the grade by just the lean mixture performance, i.e. Avgas 100/130 becomes Avgas 100). More recently, an additional grade was introduced to allow one fuel to be used in engines originally designed for grades with lower lead contents: this grade is called Avgas 100LL, the LL standing for 'low lead'.

80/87 was(is) red, 100LL is blue, 100/130 is green and 100/130 is purple
__________________
"IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT"
FLYBOYJ is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2005, 09:45 AM   #3
IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
 
FLYBOYJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 13,004
Country:
Just found this on another fourm....

"You are correct that 150 octane fuel was approved for use in July 1944. However for some reason it was not put into widespread use until the last few months of the war. What we see is a big influx of 100/150 Grade in July and then a sharp reduction of it's use until the March '45 timeframe."
__________________
"IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT"
FLYBOYJ is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2005, 03:06 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
wmaxt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 1,178
Re: 100/150 usage in the USAAF

Quote:
Originally Posted by KraziKanuK
Anyone have info on this fuel grade usage, especially when used in the P-38?
In the Alutions and the Pacific durring the war the US supplied fuel was 100/130 or better and the P-38s did well. In the ETO 87 was common and the practice of adjusting the octain was normal through the winter of '43/'44. Sometimes this adjustment was done in 55 gal drums so it was not very accurate or mixed properly. The result of this method of octain adjustment contibuted to the engine problems in the early P-38s, which as a turbo charged engine was particularly sensitive. When the fuel got better the problems ceased, though Allison also modified the intake plenum to help this situation too.

Improper cruise technics (low manifold pressure and higher rpm) contributed by lowering the air/fuel charge to the point the lead would come out of suspension.

wmaxt
wmaxt is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2005, 05:35 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Japan
Posts: 451
Quote:
Originally Posted by FLYBOYJ
Just found this on another fourm....

"You are correct that 150 octane fuel was approved for use in July 1944. However for some reason it was not put into widespread use until the last few months of the war. What we see is a big influx of 100/150 Grade in July and then a sharp reduction of it's use until the March '45 timeframe."

This actually refers to total European use, not just USAAF use. As far as I know, 150 Grade Aviation spirit wasn't used iby the USAAF anywhere outside NW Europe.

Furthermore, here actually wasn't any 'sharp reduction' in 150 used. This issue has been chewed over before.

I remember this discussion from the IL2 boards too. I also remember the posts made to refute this statement;

The 'sharp reduction' you speak of is the dip from 20-30 thousand tons usage in the June to October down to around 23,000 tons in the November to January period, something that would be considered quite normal if you look at the yearly fuel usage patterns of the RAF and USAAF in the winter period. Besides, it is a reduction of less than 20%, not really that massive, particularly when you consider that the V1 intercept operations over England ended in very early September, with a sharp decrease in operational tempo for 150/100 approved units (Spitfire IX, Mustang III, Sspitfire XIV, Tempest II, Mosquito) in the mid August peroid as more and more launch sites were over-run.

N/W Europe had a serise of bad winters durng the 1940 -1945 period, with a commesurate deterioration in weather and number of flying hours. Just look at the massive reduction in flying hours for the 'trailing the coattails' offensives that the RAF ran from 1940/'41 through to '43/'44. Winter was generally a refit and slowdown period.

VII Fighter Command converted ALL of its fighter squadrons to 150 grade aviation spirit between July and September of 1944. There were at least 15 RAF squadrons on 150 Octane by the end of July 1944. Ninth Fighter Command didn't switch to 150 Grade until much later. It is a similar story with 2 TAF, with the exception of some units who sitched back and forh between the two grades.

ADGB and VII FC account for the vast majority of operational use of 150 octane in the May 1944 to May 1945 period . Bomber, liason, training, transport and ancillary aircraft all stayed on 130/100 Grade fuel, while the fighter and fighter bomber units made the tranisition. So while it may appear that 150 Grade is a relatively minor proportion (arount 15-20% of the total), its actual front line use is a very high percentage of sorties undertaken.
Jabberwocky is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2005, 06:38 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Japan
Posts: 451
Re: 100/150 usage in the USAAF

Quote:
Originally Posted by wmaxt
Quote:
Originally Posted by KraziKanuK
Anyone have info on this fuel grade usage, especially when used in the P-38?

***SNIP
In the ETO 87 was common and the practice of adjusting the octain was normal through the winter of '43/'44. Sometimes this adjustment was done in 55 gal drums so it was not very accurate or mixed properly

SNIP ****


wmaxt
Was this for USAAF units or for British units?.

As far as I can remember, the RAF transitioned their fighter units onto 100 Grade aviation spirit around June-September 1940. Something that was carried out during the height of the Battle of France and completed during the Battle of Britain!

There are several reports of pilots flying sorties over the Dunkirk evacuation pushing their aircraft into the 12lbs emergency overboost for limited periods of time.

So if the RAF had made the transition to 100 Octane by the end of 1940, what were USAAF P-38 units doing on 87 Octane in the Winter of 43/44?. The RAF initially had to import the majority of its supplies of 100 octane from the US because the UK wasn't set up to produce it in 1940.
Jabberwocky is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2005, 03:40 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
wmaxt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 1,178
Re: 100/150 usage in the USAAF

Quote:
Originally Posted by "Jabberwocky

Was this for USAAF units or for British units?.

So if the RAF had made the transition to 100 Octane by the end of 1940, what were USAAF P-38 units doing on 87 Octane in the Winter of 43/44?. The RAF initially had to import the majority of its supplies of 100 octane from the US because the UK wasn't set up to produce it in 1940.
I've read of the 87 octain as base fuel in this instance as British standard but was adjusted for the turbo supercharged engines in the P-38. It's possible I/they were out of context on the octain number. In the spring of '44 more fuel of the higher grades was available and the hand mixing was not required. These issues in the Pacific where the fuel was already mixed never occured.

wmaxt
wmaxt is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
   

AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com Avitop.com


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86