![]() |
| |||||||
| Aviation Discussion on the aircraft of WWII. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #46 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 10,186
| I think the -190 was the better of the two for bringing down the bombers. As for AAA defenses at the POL sites, 8th AF records show that lots of bombers were damaged by them, but the actual number shot down were within acceptable limits. And the bombers that fell out of the combat box's would find plenty of escorting fighters to give it cover. I do agree about the proximity fuses. It had the potential to really do some damage. But in the end, the 8th, 15th and Bomber Commands would be willing to accept those losses in exchange for seriously damaging the POL industry.
__________________ "Pilot to copilot..... what are those mountain goats doing up here in the clouds?" |
| | |
| | #47 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Kiwi Land
Posts: 850
| If you focus on POL exclusively that would be likely. If you make it the most strategicly important target and mix it up with your other activities then you will end up with spread AA. Your next targets are power and heavy production facilities that can not be dispersed easily. Ports get visited regularly combining night area bombing and mine laying as a denial method, preventng supplies moving by this route as much as possible. Railway rolling stock gets hammered as do the yards and sheds. The replacement of rolling stock and engines means more resource draining from production of tanks etc. I would also consider major wing operations over France for fighters and ground attack wings combined, flood whole regions with mass attacks on any viable target while forcing the air clear with fighter cover, drawing German Fighters away from bomber duties, and working on attrition by numbers. Start using the Sicily airbases at this time to cut the northern transport lines in Italy, focus ground attack, and medium range bombers on this task, cut off the army in Italy from resupply as much as possible. Stick with the premise that this is the start of 1944, and every thing that is historically correct has occured, not "what if they did this" or "we did that". Work with what you have got.
__________________ 4 out of 5 voices in my head say I am normal. Majority rules. You're just jealous because the voices only talk to me. |
| | |
| | #48 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Berlin (Kreuzberg)
Posts: 1,726
| Quote:
AAA is a serious matter. One of the aspects of city bombing is that Germany needed to disperse itīs AAA force. To name some numbers: 2500 8.8cm AAA Luftwaffe and 64 10.5cm AAA in 1939. production numbers for 1939-44 are (note that 12.8cm AAA only had proximity fuze from mid 1944 onwards) for heavy AAA: 16411 8.8cm AA (army and Luftwaffe) 3889 10.5cm AA (army and Luftwaffe) 1031 12.8cm AA (luftwaffe only) Early in 1944 were 7420 heavy AAA for central Germany (including Vienna and Prague) avaiable, most of them being 8.8cm AAA. Close to 80% of the AAA in 1944 was dispersed in belts around large cities, not around key targets. 10% were reseved for Key targets, such as the Leuna oil plants. They enjoied Radar aiming but in our scenario there would be three-four times as much AAA around these key sites than historical. "In 1944 Flak accounted for 3,501 American planes destroyed, enemy fighters shot down about 600 less in the same time period. More flak guns gradually appeared, mainly the 128mm (5 in) German Flak accounted for 50 of the 72 RAF bombers lost over Berlin on the night of March 24th, 1944*. An incredible 56 bombers were destroyed or crippled by flak during a B-17 raid on Merseburg in November of 1944." - FLAK Air Defenses Fliegerabwehrkanonen (Anti-Aircraft-Artillery) *)Note that I doubt the claims, however, the 12.8cm fired proxy fuzed shells as noted above by then, so it may be possible. Concentration on POL is something worthy to do but perhaps You should delegate some or all efforts on other key targets, at least in a sukzessive way. This makes coordination of air defense a harder task. 12 months POL bombings means horrible losses with the risk of the demise of the US day bombing fleet.
__________________ ---delcyros--- Last edited by delcyros; 11-18-2006 at 04:59 PM. | |
| | |
| | #49 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 1,893
| What would You do to shorten the war? ---------------------------------------------- ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 1944 switched forward to 2007:Set a timeline for troop withdrawal. We are losing too many airmen fighting this war. We are using an administrations failed policy cannot win, and we have no good strategy in. This President has misled this country into a war without a plan. We need to pull back to our shores and defend our women and children on our undefended coastline. We are in a mess if we stay in this war, and I say we need to bring our boys back home by Christmas. We will make America a safer place. (Joke. I forgot that FDR was a Democrat. He would not be in trouble in 2007.)
__________________ ![]() "His motor's conked out!" "What's the differance, they're all Nazis!" "Luke, shut up!" "Fear the hook!" "Oh.....I wanna fly." "You mean the kind that go under water and fly up the stairs?" "What you doing? Oh Nooooo!" Last edited by Soundbreaker Welch?; 11-19-2006 at 04:16 AM. |
| | |
| | #50 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Berlin (Kreuzberg)
Posts: 1,726
| I actually would do little else, however, I would plan decently. Heavy bomber groups: Up to and including february: bombing of cities (yes, I know it may have little effect in terms of industrial output but it will cementate the AAA concentration on cities for some time) march: exclusively POL campaign (trying to get all facilities bombed) april: exclusively bombing of airfields and aircraft production related plants may-june: exclusively concentration on DDay preperations in France: communication, transport and military targets in northern France (huge task) This should push Germany in a very uncomfortable defensive position for the first half year. The decentralisation of AAA should led to reduced day bombing losses, fuel shortages will led to reduced Luftwaffe offensive abilities, very close to historic record jule: exclusively POL campaign 2 august: bombing of the cities, concentration on industrial targets september: bombing of the cities, concentration on transport relative structures oktober:exclusively POL campaign 3 november-december: Targets of opportunity, R&D, transport related structures
__________________ ---delcyros--- |
| | |
| | #51 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 1,893
| Sounds like a good plan. Wonder why the allies didn't really try to alternate more. In the Eighth Air Force Eaker wasn't the most inovative, but Doolittle?
__________________ ![]() "His motor's conked out!" "What's the differance, they're all Nazis!" "Luke, shut up!" "Fear the hook!" "Oh.....I wanna fly." "You mean the kind that go under water and fly up the stairs?" "What you doing? Oh Nooooo!" |
| | |
| | #52 |
| Banned Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,258
| Mr. Ndicki: "They may not have had a shortage of engines in theory, but the ones they did have were crap. Not on paper, but in reality." Was not aware of such fact. How come? Can you elaborate on that a bit? |
| | |
| | #53 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Edmonton,Alberta
Posts: 2,259
| Focus all air power on bombing 1. communications 2. Radar Installations 3. Airfeilds 4. AAA sites 5. Supply Movements 6. Troop Movements 7. Tanks 8. Artillery 9. Infrastructure (eg, Highways, Railroads bridges, Governement Buildings etc) 10. Coastal Forts
__________________ Hello me...meet the real me. And my misfits way of life. A dark black past is my Most valued possession. Hindsight is always 20-20, But looking back its still a bit fuzzy. Speak of mutually assured destruction? Nice story...tell it to readers digest!!! Last edited by 102first_hussars; 11-21-2006 at 10:03 PM. |
| | |
| | #54 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Kiwi Land
Posts: 850
| So apart from night time area bombing you have nothing to offer. You are Fired
__________________ 4 out of 5 voices in my head say I am normal. Majority rules. You're just jealous because the voices only talk to me. |
| | |
| | #55 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 7
| there is no way to end the war in europe in a fast @ timely matter. the nazis had to be destroyed, by any @ all means of course changes could have been made such as pulling out troops from Itlay. by 1944 musselini was dead; deplore extra troops to France starve out the German resistance just like we did in the pacific w/the Japanese,move north thru austria @ west thru France in a pincer movement around Germany @ also invade Switzerland since they were the bankers of the Reich: cut off the money you cut off the supply Last edited by Hurricane33; 11-22-2006 at 02:30 AM. |
| | |
| | #56 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 7
| that is west thru France |
| | |
| | #57 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Edmonton,Alberta
Posts: 2,259
| No way in hell i would bomb civilians so theres no point
__________________ Hello me...meet the real me. And my misfits way of life. A dark black past is my Most valued possession. Hindsight is always 20-20, But looking back its still a bit fuzzy. Speak of mutually assured destruction? Nice story...tell it to readers digest!!! |
| | |
| | #58 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 163
| I don't think I would have done anything different than what the allied commanders did. However, had they known that the Manhattan Project was going to be successful, one wonders what they would have done. |
| | |
| | #59 | |
| Der Crewchief ![]() Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 33,011
| Quote:
__________________ ![]() fly boy:"isnt that the first jet bomber becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"[/I] | |
| | |
| | #60 | |
| Der Crewchief ![]() Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 33,011
| Quote:
Invading Switzerland would have been stupid. Have you ever read up on the Swiss Defenses. Why do you think Hitler did not invade Switzerland besides the fact it was his bank. The mountains in Switzerland are hollow with defenses. They are full of artillary hidden behind false mountain faces. Everytown had hidden walls in the building consealing artillary and every Swiss man is trained in the military and everyone has military equipment and weapons. They have a vast superior knowledge of the mountains and they walled up the passes between the mountains. No one would have been stupid to invade Switzerland. It is actually still the same today as it was in WW2 in Switzerland. The mountains are still hollow and maintained and the cannons are just modern versions of the WW2 ones, barns still have machine gun nests in them and every man when they turn 18 is required to do military service and after there service is finished participate in maneuvers even as a civilian every year until a certain age which is pretty old. My soon to be brother in law is from Switzerland and he just got back from maneuvers. He works in investments in one of the richest parts of Switzerland and is pretty wealthy himself. At his house he keeps all of his military gear including his military issue rifle for when the call comes to defend his country. So as you see the only way into Germany was through France and Poland.
__________________ ![]() fly boy:"isnt that the first jet bomber becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"[/I] | |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Michael Wittman, Germany's Best Tank Commander.... | lesofprimus | WW2 General | 77 | 11-12-2007 09:29 AM |
| The 9th FS Unit History... Nov 1944 - Sept 1945.... | lesofprimus | Stories | 12 | 12-10-2006 07:06 PM |
| Air War's Greatest Aces... | lesofprimus | Stories | 14 | 10-09-2006 02:45 PM |
| USS Thorn | cheddar cheese | WW2 General | 4 | 05-23-2005 03:35 PM |
| Best German Weapon of WWII | Yeomanz | WW2 General | 89 | 03-20-2005 07:52 PM |