Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums
 



Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > World War II - Aviation > Aviation

Aviation Discussion on the aircraft of WWII.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-01-2008, 09:21 AM   #301
Senior Member
 
freebird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 2,281
Quote:
Originally Posted by magnocain View Post
Speaking of my air force...I have been working on a insignia to go with it.
What do you think

Fighter: bf 109
Bomber: B-17
Alternate Fighter: D.520
Alternate Bomber: ju88
Other: Fi 156 storch
Transport: c47
Flying Boat/Transport: Sunderland
Carrier Fighter:f4f (or the 109)
Carrier Bomber: SBD dauntless (or sea stuka)
Sorry, it's only aircraft available in 1939. The Dauntless, Wildcat & D 520 were only operational in 1940
__________________
freebird is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2008, 09:46 AM   #302
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lazio
Posts: 806
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcel View Post
Few changes:
for usual i give only a principal use for the planes.
for D XVII this is reported like a fighter training aircraft.

see you're nederlander i don't found planes in Militaire Luchtvaart van het Koninklijk Nederlands-Indisch Leger in september 1939, but i think they have same of LV, only after they bought new types, this is true?

Last edited by Vincenzo; 02-01-2008 at 09:49 AM. Reason: question to marcel
Vincenzo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2008, 02:25 PM   #303
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lazio
Posts: 806
i scrap romania from the list i don't find 1939 aircrafts, and therefore there aren't news type.
My choices:

fighter: The best fighters are surely Bf 109E and Spitfire I, only Bf 109E is on market, i choice this.

carrier fighter: F2A alone last generation on carrier and also on market this
is a choice.

heavy fighter: Bf 110 (it's more fast af all other in this category (+70 km/h) and had heavy weaponry)

dive bomber: Ju 87B

carrier dive bomber: SB2U

carrier torpedo bomber: B5N (unlucky this is not on market) my 2nd is TBD

bombers: PZL 37 (light)

heavy bombers: none, afaik none of heavy bombers was on market, and i don't think that Y1B17s, more advanced design, were fitted for war.

late i'll edit for others category

Last edited by Vincenzo; 02-05-2008 at 06:57 PM.
Vincenzo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2008, 03:30 PM   #304
Senior Member
 
Marcel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dordrecht
Posts: 3,834
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vincenzo View Post
for usual i give only a principal use for the planes.
for D XVII this is reported like a fighter training aircraft.

see you're nederlander i don't found planes in Militaire Luchtvaart van het Koninklijk Nederlands-Indisch Leger in september 1939, but i think they have same of LV, only after they bought new types, this is true?
Hi Vincenzo, the D.XVII was the standard fighter before the D.XXI, so it was a fighter, not a trainer. T.V was initially designed to do the same job as the G.I, being a "luchtkruiser" or a "Kampfzerstoerer" as the germans named it. Later they recognised it would better be seen as a bomber instead of a fighter. Nevertheless with the overwhelming air superiority of the germans, the T.V had to be returned to their original roll as a heavy fighter and even shot down a few planes.

I'm not sure what you mean by your question, but the KNIL (Royal dutch indies army) had their own policy in airplane specification. For instance, the D.XXI was designed for the KNIL, but they refused it, after which the LVA bought them. The KNIL in 1940-1941 was manly equiped with US planes, like the Curtis fighters, Martin bombers etc. and a few geman ones like the dornier flyingboat.
__________________

" The knack of flying lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss."

Last edited by Marcel; 02-01-2008 at 03:33 PM.
Marcel is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2008, 08:48 AM   #305
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lazio
Posts: 806
i see orbat of LV for 1939 not D XVII was indicated for fighter units, is common for old fighter became training fighter. if you know in that unit D XVII was in service can you give me the info? yes for knil it's easy find 1940/1 aircrafts but for this topic need 1939 aircrafts
Vincenzo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2008, 11:18 AM   #306
Senior Member
 
Marcel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dordrecht
Posts: 3,834
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vincenzo View Post
i see orbat of LV for 1939 not D XVII was indicated for fighter units, is common for old fighter became training fighter. if you know in that unit D XVII was in service can you give me the info? yes for knil it's easy find 1940/1 aircrafts but for this topic need 1939 aircrafts
The D.XVII was on fighter strength until 3 rd of may 1940 in V-2-LvR, they were then withdrawn to fighter school, only to be transfered back to the LVA on the 11th of may for escorting duties.
As for the LV-KNIL in 1939, I'm not sure. I know they had Curtis Hawk 75 planes, but don't know when they were delivered, I believe in 1938 or '39 but not sure. Also on strength for sure were Martin 139 bombers, Dornier Wal flyingboats and Fokker C.V reconnaissance planes.
__________________

" The knack of flying lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss."
Marcel is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2008, 12:30 PM   #307
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lazio
Posts: 806
for hawk 75 wikipedia report order of october 1939 and shipped in '40.
for me is hard understand nederlander but i think that martin 139 were in service from april 1939. (Glenn Martin 139 en 166)
Vincenzo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2008, 03:11 PM   #308
Senior Member
 
Marcel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dordrecht
Posts: 3,834
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vincenzo View Post
for hawk 75 wikipedia report order of october 1939 and shipped in '40.
for me is hard understand nederlander but i think that martin 139 were in service from april 1939. (Glenn Martin 139 en 166)
No, it says:
Quote:
Op 2 september 1936 werd de eerste WH-1, de M-501 met constructienummer 656 overgedragen. Half december arriveerde de M501 en de M-502 in Nederlands-Indië
On september the 2nd 1936 the first WH-1, no. M-501, constructionnumber 656, was delivered, the M501 and M502 arrived in december in the dutch indies.
(ed. the WH-1 was the dutch version of the Martin 139)

Further more it say. Later, the 139 was developed into the 166 and this model was ordered as the WH-3. The last of these came into service in April 1939. I guess this last line causes the confusion.

I saw that I confused the order date with the delivery date of the Hawk 75, thanks. The KNIL did have however Curtiss P-6 Hawk planes, from about 1930, I guess they were still on duty in 1939 but I cannot be sure at the moment. They were at least in 1936, when they wanted to replace them with D.XXI's. They finally descided to buy bombers instead of fighters.
__________________

" The knack of flying lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss."
Marcel is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:42 AM.
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Ad Management plugin by RedTyger
Design by HTWoRKS


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118