![]() |
| |||||||
| Aviation Discussion on the aircraft of WWII. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: oregon
Posts: 4,198
| 8th AF FC kills/losses summary - 1st Draft This is my first published pass at compiling all 8th FC records for a/c destroyed and lost as well as missions flown. I know there are errors if for no other reason than conflicting data within the sources themselves. The sources are in no particular order - 8th AF Victory Credits Board for Ground awards, USAF 85 for air awards, Frank Olynyk for cross check on air awards, 8th AF and Roger Freeman for mission totals, Miller and Ethell and Fry and Olmstead, etc for individual Macr research. In the area of 'losses due to unknown causes' I split the losses into two categories and continue to research them. First, where enemy air existed the Unkown was moved into "Lost-air" category simply because I didn't want to taint an already good record by lowering the air loss total artificially. I also counted as Lost-air those circumstances where a fighter crashed in Channel or on English or Swiss or Sweden soil due to damage incurred in a gunfight with LW for same reasons as above The rest of the Unknown became "Unknown -all other" to include oxygen system failures, weather, mechanical, loss of control, etc where no enemy fighter activity was present. The below tables are hard to read because I don't know how to get the tabs to work right In order the columns are , Group, Air Awards/Ground Awards, Air Losses, All Ops losses (including air, weather, flak, mechanical) Accidents, Total Losses, Missions flown ----awards-- ---- losses------- # gp air ground air all ops acc total missions 4 550.0 461.3 86 242 15 257 576 20 211.5 226.5 39 145 9 154 322 55 304.5 266.0 59 185 11 196 360 56 664.0 320.5 57 139 26 165 462 78 326.0 342.5 51 188 16 204 450 339 235.0 431.0 27 105 7 112 264 352 504.5 275.0 40 115 10 125 420 353 328.0 404.5 40 141 13 154 447 355 340.0 502.5 46 177 8 185 352 356 200.0 77.0 36 115 7 122 407 357 595.5 107.7 48 139 9 148 318 358 1.0 0.0 3 4 0 4 16 359 255.5 117.0 43 127 8 135 346 361 222.0 111.0 16 91 7 98 441 364 266.5 191.0 37 138 9 147 345 479 155.0 268.0 10 77 15 92 251 ESF/2SF 12.0 7.0 1 5 4 10 79 ------- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ----- 5171.0 4108.4 639.0 2133.0 174.0 2308.0 5856.0 Notes 1 USAF 85 and Dr. Frank Olynyk. Some USAF 85 awards given to wrong unit but corrected here. 2 8th AF Victory Credit Board 3 Losses prior to VE Day, air to air, All Combat Operations, Accidents over UK The above data is in process of cross checking against 8th AF records, Kent Miller and other sources like Ethell and Fry and Olmstead, etc. It will NEVER be 100% accurate because of the variability of actual combat reporting, over claiming and awards against 'Actual' - this is true for both sides. But it is best I've seen so far - this represents about two man years of research and you guys get to see it first. Have at it and tear it apart Regards, Bill Last edited by drgondog; 11-03-2007 at 02:43 PM. |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Minister of Whoopass ![]() Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Long Island Native in Mississippi
Posts: 18,463
| Man the 357th took a beating.... Very good work Bill, cant imagne how tedious that was....
__________________ My IL2 Video Tribute to My Grandfather: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HtzN5RuNNJk My 1/32nd Rendition of His Corsair: http://www.ww2aircraft.net/forum/2-p...3-a-20416.html |
| | |
| | #3 |
| “Archive” ![]() Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 5,228
| Awsome Bill, Im going to have to study this more in detail. Great Job!!!!!!!
__________________ ![]() "Valor does not mean Hero." |
| | |
| | #4 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: oregon
Posts: 4,198
| Quote:
On the other hand the 4th FG had one of the worst air to air ratios in the 8th AF - hovering around 6:1 The 'new groups' like the 339th and 357th and 479th that flew most or all their ops in 51s had the best air to air ratios and the 56th was also high on the ratings. The P-38 groups that later converted like the 20th and 55th and 364th that really didn't fly the 38L were low in the air to air ratios. the 479th did fly the L and then went 51 is way up there with approx 15;1 air to air (only) Yeah - tedious is an understatement because all had to be built up from individual sources, cross referenced against 'official' sources, audited from about 10% of the Macrs and then another cross reference against the only single repository - namely Kent Miller. I know Kent has errors but he is the only one to put out a well researched compilation of scores and losses for all of 8th FC. The single biggest difference between Kent's published figures and mine is that mine has a much higher attributation to air losses as he has quite a few "unknowns" in his that I think were air. Guys - if either one of you know how to map an excel spreadsheet to one of the posts - PM me with your email address and I'll send the current spreadsheet. The next step for me is to take one more level and see if I can break out the awards and losses to the type of ship for better granularity on comparing 47 against 38 and 51. (and Spit for 4th) Last edited by drgondog; 11-03-2007 at 02:39 PM. | |
| | |
| | #5 |
| “Archive” ![]() Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 5,228
| Is this correct Bill? Picture removed and new one updated below.
__________________ ![]() "Valor does not mean Hero." Last edited by Micdrow; 11-03-2007 at 03:25 PM. |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: oregon
Posts: 4,198
| Close - the column "ground Losses' should be Ground Awards and the last column is Missions Flown (not sorties).. sorties would not be far off if you multipled by about 45 (for effective) I might add that the missions flown is biggest source of frustration as I know that Roger Freeman had errors in this How did you do that? Last edited by drgondog; 11-03-2007 at 03:09 PM. |
| | |
| | #7 |
| “Archive” ![]() Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 5,228
| Hopefully that's the only one. New one below. I copied the message into Microsoft word. Tabbed the columns. Once I had that done I copied and pasted it into paint and saved as a jpeg.
__________________ ![]() "Valor does not mean Hero." Last edited by Micdrow; 11-03-2007 at 04:17 PM. |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Minister of Whoopass ![]() Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Long Island Native in Mississippi
Posts: 18,463
| Yea I read the chart wrong Bill, and that new chart is bad ass....
__________________ My IL2 Video Tribute to My Grandfather: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HtzN5RuNNJk My 1/32nd Rendition of His Corsair: http://www.ww2aircraft.net/forum/2-p...3-a-20416.html |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 679
| Go 56th! -= ACES =- All kills shown are for in squadron only. Many pilots had kills from their time in other groups / squadrons: HQ: Schilling, D (22.5) Zemke, H (15.25) Johnson, G (1) 61ST Fighter Squadron: ![]() Gabreski, G (twenty eight) Johnson, R (25) Powers, J (12) Stewart, J (11.5) Gladych, B (10) Rankin, R (10) Johnson, G (7.5) Klibbe, F (7) Keen, R (7) Lamb, R (7) Conger, P (6.5) Carter, J (6) Smith, L (6) Bennett, J (5.5) McCauley, F (5.5) Smith, D (5.5) Gerick, S (5) McMinn, E (5) Lanowski, W (4) Schreiber, L (2) 62ND Fighter Squadron: ![]() Christensen, F (21.5) Williamson, F (13) Quirk, M (11) Schreiber, L (10) Morrill, S (9) Jackson, M (eight) Edens, B (7) Moseley, M (6.5) Cook, W (6) Bostwick, G (5) Icard, J (5) O'Neill, E (4.5) Gould, N (4) Dade, L (3) Powers, J (2.5) Smith, L (1) 63RD Fighter Squadron: ![]() Mahurin, W (19.75) Schlitz, G (eight) Johnson, G (7) Truluck, J (7) Hall, G (6) Hart, C (6) Comstock, H (5) Conger, P (5) Egan, J (5) Vogt, J (5) Bostwick, G (3)
__________________ August 12, 1944 - In an armor cover mission at the Falaise track, Charlie Rife, 368th FG, 395th FS, takes 37mm fllak rounds to both wings. His wingman, Richard Kik, takes a 20mm round to the engine that knocks out two cylinders. Both make it back. Last edited by Jank; 11-03-2007 at 04:03 PM. |
| | |
| | #10 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: oregon
Posts: 4,198
| Quote:
355th lost 2x to flak as compared to air to air (92 vs 46) and lost 31 of the 46 air to air in the first seven months of ops then 15 in last year. I will have this in more detail in my new book but haven't decided what the 'so what' is yet.. (scratching head and mumbling a lot) | |
| | |
| | #11 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: oregon
Posts: 4,198
| Quote:
My guess is that they would have ended up closer to 1000 in the air due to better leadership from top down. | |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Helsinki
Posts: 1,561
| Hello Micdrow I think the header for the last column should be "Missions flown". And thanks a lot, Bill. Very interesting info! And Micdrow, thanks for the image, it's easier to read! Juha |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 10,812
| Great job!
__________________ "Pilot to copilot..... what are those mountain goats doing up here in the clouds?" |
| | |
| | #14 | |
| “Archive” ![]() Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 5,228
| Quote:
Its fixed, Thanks
__________________ ![]() "Valor does not mean Hero." | |
| | |
| | #15 |
| IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO ![]() Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 16,875
| Great stuff Bill but don't let Joe B see it -
__________________ > I Support Doug Gillis < |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |