Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums

8th AF FC kills/losses summary - 1st Draft

Aviation Discuss 8th AF FC kills/losses summary - 1st Draft in the World War II - Aviation forums; This is my first published pass at compiling all 8th FC records for a/c destroyed and lost as well ...


Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > World War II - Aviation > Aviation

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 11-03-2007, 02:56 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
drgondog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: oregon
Posts: 2,597
Country:
8th AF FC kills/losses summary - 1st Draft

This is my first published pass at compiling all 8th FC records for a/c destroyed and lost as well as missions flown. I know there are errors if for no other reason than conflicting data within the sources themselves.

The sources are in no particular order - 8th AF Victory Credits Board for Ground awards, USAF 85 for air awards, Frank Olynyk for cross check on air awards, 8th AF and Roger Freeman for mission totals, Miller and Ethell and Fry and Olmstead, etc for individual Macr research.

In the area of 'losses due to unknown causes' I split the losses into two categories and continue to research them. First, where enemy air existed the Unkown was moved into "Lost-air" category simply because I didn't want to taint an already good record by lowering the air loss total artificially.

I also counted as Lost-air those circumstances where a fighter crashed in Channel or on English or Swiss or Sweden soil due to damage incurred in a gunfight with LW for same reasons as above

The rest of the Unknown became "Unknown -all other" to include oxygen system failures, weather, mechanical, loss of control, etc where no enemy fighter activity was present.

The below tables are hard to read because I don't know how to get the tabs to work right

In order the columns are , Group, Air Awards/Ground Awards, Air Losses, All Ops losses (including air, weather, flak, mechanical) Accidents, Total Losses, Missions flown
----awards-- ---- losses------- #
gp air ground air all ops acc total missions

4 550.0 461.3 86 242 15 257 576
20 211.5 226.5 39 145 9 154 322
55 304.5 266.0 59 185 11 196 360
56 664.0 320.5 57 139 26 165 462
78 326.0 342.5 51 188 16 204 450
339 235.0 431.0 27 105 7 112 264
352 504.5 275.0 40 115 10 125 420
353 328.0 404.5 40 141 13 154 447
355 340.0 502.5 46 177 8 185 352
356 200.0 77.0 36 115 7 122 407
357 595.5 107.7 48 139 9 148 318
358 1.0 0.0 3 4 0 4 16
359 255.5 117.0 43 127 8 135 346
361 222.0 111.0 16 91 7 98 441
364 266.5 191.0 37 138 9 147 345
479 155.0 268.0 10 77 15 92 251
ESF/2SF 12.0 7.0 1 5 4 10 79
------- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ -----
5171.0 4108.4 639.0 2133.0 174.0 2308.0 5856.0
Notes
1 USAF 85 and Dr. Frank Olynyk. Some USAF 85 awards given to wrong unit but corrected here.
2 8th AF Victory Credit Board
3 Losses prior to VE Day, air to air, All Combat Operations, Accidents over UK
The above data is in process of cross checking against 8th AF records, Kent Miller and other sources like Ethell and Fry and Olmstead, etc. It will NEVER be 100% accurate because of the variability of actual combat reporting, over claiming and awards against 'Actual' - this is true for both sides.

But it is best I've seen so far - this represents about two man years of research and you guys get to see it first. Have at it and tear it apart

Regards,

Bill

Last edited by drgondog : 11-03-2007 at 03:43 PM.
drgondog is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2007, 03:18 PM   #2
Minister of Whoopass
 
lesofprimus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Long Island Native in Mississippi
Posts: 13,758
Country:
Man the 357th took a beating.... Very good work Bill, cant imagne how tedious that was....
__________________


"After That Second Kill, I Knew It Was Time To Get The Hell Outta There..."--Lt. William Northrop Case

To See My IL2 Sturmovik Video Tribute to My Grandfather, Click Here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HtzN5RuNNJk
lesofprimus is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2007, 03:25 PM   #3
Moderator
 
Micdrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 3,189
Country:
Send a message via ICQ to Micdrow
Awsome Bill, Im going to have to study this more in detail.

Great Job!!!!!!!
__________________

"Valor does not mean Hero."
Micdrow is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2007, 03:35 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
drgondog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: oregon
Posts: 2,597
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by lesofprimus View Post
Man the 357th took a beating.... Very good work Bill, cant imagne how tedious that was....
Dan - as screwed up as my columns were, you may have mis read the 357th - it had a great air to air ratio and also great on total ops losses - because they largely kept their nose out of the mud whereas the 4th and 355th were in the weeds strafing a lot. Of the 46 air to air lost by 355th approximately half were lost under 5,000 feet. Ditto the 4th who lost twice as many in air as 355th... but they lost about 18% of their total air losses on D-Day and August 18 when caught by LW under the overcast from above and behind.

On the other hand the 4th FG had one of the worst air to air ratios in the 8th AF - hovering around 6:1

The 'new groups' like the 339th and 357th and 479th that flew most or all their ops in 51s had the best air to air ratios and the 56th was also high on the ratings.

The P-38 groups that later converted like the 20th and 55th and 364th that really didn't fly the 38L were low in the air to air ratios. the 479th did fly the L and then went 51 is way up there with approx 15;1 air to air (only)

Yeah - tedious is an understatement because all had to be built up from individual sources, cross referenced against 'official' sources, audited from about 10% of the Macrs and then another cross reference against the only single repository - namely Kent Miller. I know Kent has errors but he is the only one to put out a well researched compilation of scores and losses for all of 8th FC.

The single biggest difference between Kent's published figures and mine is that mine has a much higher attributation to air losses as he has quite a few "unknowns" in his that I think were air.

Guys - if either one of you know how to map an excel spreadsheet to one of the posts - PM me with your email address and I'll send the current spreadsheet.

The next step for me is to take one more level and see if I can break out the awards and losses to the type of ship for better granularity on comparing 47 against 38 and 51. (and Spit for 4th)

Last edited by drgondog : 11-03-2007 at 03:39 PM.
drgondog is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2007, 03:50 PM   #5
Moderator
 
Micdrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 3,189
Country:
Send a message via ICQ to Micdrow
Is this correct Bill?

Picture removed and new one updated below.
__________________

"Valor does not mean Hero."

Last edited by Micdrow : 11-03-2007 at 04:25 PM.
Micdrow is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2007, 04:04 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
drgondog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: oregon
Posts: 2,597
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Micdrow View Post
Is this correct Bill?
Close - the column "ground Losses' should be Ground Awards and the last column is Missions Flown (not sorties).. sorties would not be far off if you multipled by about 45 (for effective)

I might add that the missions flown is biggest source of frustration as I know that Roger Freeman had errors in this

How did you do that?

Last edited by drgondog : 11-03-2007 at 04:09 PM.
drgondog is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2007, 04:07 PM   #7
Moderator
 
Micdrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 3,189
Country:
Send a message via ICQ to Micdrow
Hopefully that's the only one. New one below.

I copied the message into Microsoft word. Tabbed the columns. Once I had that done I copied and pasted it into paint and saved as a jpeg.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 8th losses.JPG (56.8 KB, 42 views)
__________________

"Valor does not mean Hero."

Last edited by Micdrow : 11-03-2007 at 05:17 PM.
Micdrow is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2007, 04:40 PM   #8
Minister of Whoopass
 
lesofprimus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Long Island Native in Mississippi
Posts: 13,758
Country:
Yea I read the chart wrong Bill, and that new chart is bad ass....
__________________


"After That Second Kill, I Knew It Was Time To Get The Hell Outta There..."--Lt. William Northrop Case

To See My IL2 Sturmovik Video Tribute to My Grandfather, Click Here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HtzN5RuNNJk
lesofprimus is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2007, 04:46 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
Jank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 681
Go 56th! -= ACES =- All kills shown are for in squadron only. Many pilots had kills from their time in other groups / squadrons:

HQ:

Schilling, D (22.5)
Zemke, H (15.25)
Johnson, G (1)


61ST Fighter Squadron:



Gabreski, G (twenty eight)
Johnson, R (25)
Powers, J (12)
Stewart, J (11.5)
Gladych, B (10)
Rankin, R (10)
Johnson, G (7.5)
Klibbe, F (7)
Keen, R (7)
Lamb, R (7)
Conger, P (6.5)
Carter, J (6)
Smith, L (6)
Bennett, J (5.5)
McCauley, F (5.5)
Smith, D (5.5)
Gerick, S (5)
McMinn, E (5)
Lanowski, W (4)
Schreiber, L (2)

62ND Fighter Squadron:



Christensen, F (21.5)
Williamson, F (13)
Quirk, M (11)
Schreiber, L (10)
Morrill, S (9)
Jackson, M (eight)
Edens, B (7)
Moseley, M (6.5)
Cook, W (6)
Bostwick, G (5)
Icard, J (5)
O'Neill, E (4.5)
Gould, N (4)
Dade, L (3)
Powers, J (2.5)
Smith, L (1)

63RD Fighter Squadron:



Mahurin, W (19.75)
Schlitz, G (eight)
Johnson, G (7)
Truluck, J (7)
Hall, G (6)
Hart, C (6)
Comstock, H (5)
Conger, P (5)
Egan, J (5)
Vogt, J (5)
Bostwick, G (3)
__________________
August 12, 1944 - In an armor cover mission at the Falaise track, Charlie Rife, 368th FG, 395th FS, takes 37mm fllak rounds to both wings. His wingman, Richard Kik, takes a 20mm round to the engine that knocks out two cylinders. Both make it back.

Last edited by Jank : 11-03-2007 at 05:03 PM.
Jank is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2007, 04:50 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
drgondog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: oregon
Posts: 2,597
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by lesofprimus View Post
Yea I read the chart wrong Bill, and that new chart is bad ass....
Now that Paul has me squared away I need to go ahead and break out the flak losses... THAT is revealing... 357FG way low on ground scores and flak losses, 355 and 4th way high on ground awards and flak losses. % flak losses of 56th low (all Jug), etc.

355th lost 2x to flak as compared to air to air (92 vs 46) and lost 31 of the 46 air to air in the first seven months of ops then 15 in last year.

I will have this in more detail in my new book but haven't decided what the 'so what' is yet.. (scratching head and mumbling a lot)
drgondog is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2007, 04:56 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
drgondog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: oregon
Posts: 2,597
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jank View Post
Go 56th!

HQ: Schilling, D (22.5)
Zemke, H (15.25)
Johnson, G (1)


61st FS: Gabreski, G (2 62nd FS: Christensen, F (21.5) 63rd FS: Mahurin, W (19.75)
Johnson, R (25) Williamson, F (13) Schlitz, G (
Powers, J (12) Quirk, M (11) Johnson, G (7)
Stewart, J (11.5) Schreiber, L (10) Truluck, J (7)
Gladych, B (10) Morrill, S (9) Hall, G (6)
Rankin, R (10) Jackson, M ( Hart, C (6)
Johnson, G (7.5) Edens, B (7) Comstock, H (5)
Klibbe, F (7) Moseley, M (6.5) Conger, P (5)
Keen, R (7) Cook, W (6) Egan, J (5)
Lamb, R (7) Bostwick, G (5) Vogt, J (5)
Conger, P (6.5) Icard, J (5) Bostwick, G (3)
Carter, J (6) O'Neill, E (4.5)
Smith, L (6) Gould, N (4)
Bennett, J (5.5) Dade, L (3)
McCauley, F (5.5) Powers, J (2.5)
Smith, D (5.5) Johnson, R (2)
Gerick, S (5) Smith, L (1)
McMinn, E (5)
Lanowski, W (4)
Schreiber, L (2)
Yeah - Jank they really demonstrate the value of the Jug - FAR better than any othe unit in USAAF! It is interesting to speculate on where they would have ended up in air to air standing if they had agreed to be converted to P-51s in February 1944 when they were scheduled.. Surely they would have had many more scores during Target escort in March-July timeframe when they were restricted to Penetration/Withdrawal.

My guess is that they would have ended up closer to 1000 in the air due to better leadership from top down.
drgondog is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2007, 04:59 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Helsinki
Posts: 696
Country:
Hello Micdrow
I think the header for the last column should be "Missions flown".
And thanks a lot, Bill. Very interesting info!
And Micdrow, thanks for the image, it's easier to read!

Juha
Juha is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2007, 05:07 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
syscom3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 8,614
Great job!
__________________
"Pilot to copilot..... what are those mountain goats doing up here in the clouds?"
syscom3 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2007, 05:18 PM   #14
Moderator
 
Micdrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 3,189
Country:
Send a message via ICQ to Micdrow
Quote:
Originally Posted by Juha View Post
Hello Micdrow
I think the header for the last column should be "Missions flown".
And thanks a lot, Bill. Very interesting info!
And Micdrow, thanks for the image, it's easier to read!

Juha

Its fixed, Thanks
__________________

"Valor does not mean Hero."
Micdrow is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2007, 10:11 PM   #15
IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
 
FLYBOYJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 13,836
Country:
Great stuff Bill but don't let Joe B see it -
__________________
"IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT"
FLYBOYJ is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
   

AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com Avitop.com


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53