Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums

Aircraft Identification V

Aviation Discuss Aircraft Identification V in the World War II - Aviation forums; Woaaah, you are hard with us Grampa......


Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > World War II - Aviation > Aviation

Reply
 
LinkBack (1) Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 04-01-2008, 08:34 AM   #1741
Member
 
Célérité's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Nantes
Posts: 66
Country:
Woaaah, you are hard with us Grampa...
Célérité is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2008, 11:45 PM   #1742
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 158
More clue in underline

It newer played it's roll trou the whole WWII for the contry that created the plane but for other country it did.
The last of them used as a communication and meterological reconnaissance.
It normally carrried 2000 rounds of bullet.
Whit all the guns together it fired 80 rounds per sec.
carried no bombs.
It whas lighter, has shorter wingspan but nearly 1/3 times bigger wingarea and agiler than a Zero but no faster.
It whas faster and got nearly twice so bigger firepower than a A5M "Claude" bur whas heavier.
They produced nearly 750 of this plane and nearly 220 of it whent for export.
In the cold winter day's some where fitted whit skies.
It whas used against the japanese air force and the first score it did whas the A5M.
Power to weight ratio at maximum take off was around 5.86 lb/hk.
The 9 cylinder radional engine it used whas not over 25 litres and weighted little over 1000 lbs.
The early version used 2-blades woodproppeller and later version the Fairey-Reed metalproppeller.
Build whit 2 wingstag on each side.
Used hydralic manuvering trailing-edge flaps.
Landinggear of brackettype whit an internally-sprung wheel.
An enclosed cockpit.
Betveen 50 or 70 of them become as Carrier-version 1938 whit an increased emty-weight of 135 kg. Those carrier-plane where fitted whit automatic mixture controll, electric starter, Vokes air filter in the carburettor intake and a arrester hook.
Grampa is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2008, 01:06 AM   #1743
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,318
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Krabat42 View Post
Never heard of that plane, found that in Aerofiles:
Look like it's the right plane for Chris, he loves the R2800. Did it really fly and race?Krabat
The Don Equis Challenger was just another clue Krabat. True identity is the Statler Wildfire.

Wildfire Air Racing History
Graeme is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2008, 05:14 AM   #1744
Senior Member
 
Krabat42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Munich
Posts: 218
Country:
Thanks Graeme, an interesting story. Would like to see the thing flying the course.

Regarding Grampa's quiz, here are my thoughts:

- must be a biplane (wingspan and wing area)
- built as a fighter (no bombs) but used as a trainer in it's home country (only 220 for export but not used for its original role in its own country)
- 4 machine guns (twice the A5M), probably Browning .303 (20 rps each would match)

Does anyone have an idea? I'm still stuck with the CW-21, maybe banging my head on the desk will help somewhat.

Krabat
Krabat42 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2008, 07:01 AM   #1745
A4K
Senior Member
 
A4K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,528
Country:
Fokker variant?
A4K is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2008, 10:40 AM   #1746
Member
 
paaln's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Oslo
Posts: 91
Country:
Gladiator
paaln is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2008, 12:42 PM   #1747
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 158
to paaln and how did you figured it out? It took a while for the other. and shall you try get a new question
see Gloster Gladiator - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Grampa is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2008, 02:16 AM   #1748
Senior Member
 
Krabat42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Munich
Posts: 218
Country:
Paaln, my congratulations.

Grampa, don't call me a poor sport but the Gladiator was my very first thought. I dismissed it because of
Quote:
It newer played it's roll trou the whole WWII for the contry that created the plane but for other country it did.
Either "never" or "not through the whole war", not both. It was just not clear enough, the Gladiator WAS used as an RAF fighter during the early stages of the war, though not through the whole war. So I think most of us dismissed the Glad for the same reason.

But a nice new idea for the quiz, I admit. Let's try another one. Paaln?
Krabat42 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2008, 07:15 AM   #1749
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 158
Sorry that I you in wrong way. Well its because im a little in languages because I havent been good in english so i can well but im a little what you would fel , so plz dont fel like im to your forum.
sorry for this.
Grampa is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2008, 08:07 AM   #1750
Senior Member
 
Krabat42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Munich
Posts: 218
Country:
No sweat, Grampa. No offence taken. English isn't my mother language either, I just wanted to explain why nobody of the others found out about the Glad.

I'm not offended and you're not stupid. And you're always welcome here. There ARE people with really stupid views in this forum (well, in my opinion at least ) but you're definitely not one of them. And now let's forget the whole thing, right?

Krabat
Krabat42 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2008, 10:08 AM   #1751
A4K
Senior Member
 
A4K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,528
Country:
...I wouldn't have got it anyway, hell, most of the pictures are hard enough for me, as it is...
A4K is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2008, 01:40 AM   #1752
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,318
Country:
Cockpit Capers

Graeme is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2008, 02:12 AM   #1753
Senior Member
 
Krabat42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Munich
Posts: 218
Country:
Canadair CL-215

The yelow colour was a good hint. Didn't know that Heinemann was involved. Not really his kind of aircraft, looking at the "Scooter".



Krabat
Krabat42 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2008, 02:33 AM   #1754
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,318
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Krabat42 View Post
Canadair CL-215
Sure is. Too easy?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Krabat42 View Post
The yelow colour was a good hint.
OK. No colour this time.

Graeme is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2008, 05:29 AM   #1755
Senior Member
 
eddie_brunette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Nelspruit, Mpumalanga
Posts: 266
Country:
plane.jpeg
eddie_brunette is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.ww2aircraft.net/forum/aviation/aircraft-identification-v-1737.html
Posted By For Type Date
Alice - Rechercher This thread Refback 11-19-2006 11:10 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
   

AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com Avitop.com


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83