![]() |
| | #1906 |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,081
| |
| | |
| | #1907 |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 914
| Is it a Sikorsky S-38? Last edited by Waynos; 05-23-2008 at 02:42 PM. Reason: typo |
| | |
| | #1908 |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,081
| |
| | |
| | #1909 |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 914
| Nice drawing! I always preferred Commando books where the drawings of the aircraft were accurate looking Here's one to have a go at, it is a bit obscure. ![]() Is there any sort of ruling on the types of pictures posted here? Do they have to be '30's/WW2 or can you post anything? |
| | |
| | #1910 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,081
| Hi Waynos! Quote:
Sorry Waynos. but you'll have to accept that others have Jane's '38... The Hall XPTBH-1. Here's one not in the '38... | |
| | |
| | #1911 |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 914
| "Sorry Waynos. but you'll have to accept that others have Jane's '38..." lol, fair enough. scratch that as a source then, or better still - don't announce where they come from As to your pic, I haven't a clue - it looks a bit 1932, but the '38 Janes is my oldest source. I shall have to dig deep or wait for somebody else to get it. btw, are unbuilt projects allowed or must they have flown? Some unbuilt projects are obviously just a designers doodles but some progressed quite far without flying obviously. |
| | |
| | #1912 |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,081
| No need Waynos. Try looking for a BLERIOT design. Personally, if they weren't constructed or at least a mock-up that was photographed, then they shouldn't be here. As you pointed out 'designer doodle' numbers would be in the 'tens' of thousands. |
| | |
| | #1913 |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 914
| I found it, the Bleriot 111! I did think it was a Bleriot but didn't want to guess in case I was miles out and looked stupid, lol. "if they weren't constructed or at least a mock-up that was photographed, " that sounds like a very sensible demarcation. Here's one that shouldn't be difficult, I include it here because I like it Last edited by Waynos; 05-24-2008 at 08:03 AM. Reason: changed image name |
| | |
| | #1914 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 214
| |
| | |
| | #1915 |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,081
| |
| | |
| | #1916 |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 914
| Same place as yours because I had to crop that very caption off to post it. I forget which book (its been on my pc a very long time) but its one of several 'worst planes' books I have. Here's another entertaining photo, id the plane? |
| | |
| | #1917 |
| Junior Member | |
| | |
| | #1918 |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 914
| Looks like a T-6 with a raised and reprofiled rear fuselage, for a movie maybe? |
| | |
| | #1919 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,081
| Quote:
Looks like a car-eating Westland Wyvern. A North American P-64? (Do they still exist?) Edit - Can't be, the tail shape is wrong. Last edited by Graeme; 05-24-2008 at 08:11 PM. Reason: second thoughts | |
| | |
| | #1920 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,412
| Looks more like a Wirraway, though the USAAF symbol... ![]() And the span looks a bit short for either a T-6 or a Wirraway, and it apears to be a single-seater, possably a Boomerang, that insignia still bothers me though... Last edited by kool kitty89; 05-24-2008 at 08:19 PM. |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.ww2aircraft.net/forum/aviation/aircraft-identification-v-1737.html | ||||
| Posted By | For | Type | Date | |
| Alice - Rechercher | This thread | Refback | 11-19-2006 01:10 PM | |