![]() |
| |||||||
| Aviation Discussion on the aircraft of WWII. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack (1) | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #2506 |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 914
| You know Graeme, after the small scale one earlier I was waiting for this one to turn up, I even considered it myself
__________________ BlondeValkyrie - Bugger off and host your OWN pictures you thieving twat |
| | |
| | #2507 |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 914
| Heres one to have a go at;
__________________ BlondeValkyrie - Bugger off and host your OWN pictures you thieving twat |
| | |
| | #2508 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,412
| It looks kind of like an F-86. (especially the canopy) Hmm... |
| | |
| | #2509 |
| Senior Member | |
| | |
| | #2510 |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,076
| |
| | |
| | #2511 |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 914
| Thats the Armstrong Whitworth 168, would-be Buccaneer. I've always been struck by its apparent likeness to the A-6 Intruder in many respects.
__________________ BlondeValkyrie - Bugger off and host your OWN pictures you thieving twat |
| | |
| | #2512 |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,076
| Very good Wayne! Obviously you have a lot of knowledge on British Projects, so I was wondering about this one...you probably know about it. ![]() Another Armstrong project (a serious one - despite the "Thunderbirds" look) for a supersonic transport. According to the article the MoA placed a contract for five solid fuel rockets that were fitted with the "M" wing, in 1960. I'm under the impression that they flew? Do you have any more? Any photos/images? Can't find much on the internet. |
| | |
| | #2513 |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 914
| I have some three view images, but no photo's I'm aware of. The one you posted is the P.13003, this evolved into the P22001 which was bigger and with a T-tail. AW weren't the only ones to try this comical layout though, there was also the mystriously named Vickers Project X which had fuel tanks where the AW's engines are and its own engines were built into the rear fuselage. It also lacked the 'sonic boom diffuser' nose probe that the AW designs had
__________________ BlondeValkyrie - Bugger off and host your OWN pictures you thieving twat |
| | |
| | #2514 |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,076
| Last edited by Graeme; 10-24-2008 at 03:22 AM. Reason: 'seeing double' |
| | |
| | #2515 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,412
| Looks a bit like an Ar 96. The wing fence is interesting. (I know it was tested on the Bf 109 prototypes with fences in place of slats) But the 3-bladed prop seems a bit out of place. The canopy and nose look like an Ar 96 though. Last edited by kool kitty89; 10-23-2008 at 06:24 PM. |
| | |
| | #2516 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 106
| Almost a Dornier 335 is my guess. Mini prototype? Been lurking for a while, now actually signed up. : ) |
| | |
| | #2517 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 106
| Noticed the Avro Lincoln in the background of that Supermarine 545. |
| | |
| | #2518 |
| Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: Logroņo, Spain
Posts: 89
| It looks to me more like a twin fork fighter. The dutch Fokker D.XXIII |
| | |
| | #2519 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,076
| Quote:
Yes, it is Emilio. | |
| | |
| | #2520 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,412
| The angle makes the boom-wing join look like a fence. I should have noticed the nose wheel. Last edited by kool kitty89; 10-24-2008 at 07:09 AM. |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.ww2aircraft.net/forum/aviation/aircraft-identification-v-1737.html | ||||
| Posted By | For | Type | Date | |
| Alice - Rechercher | This thread | Refback | 11-19-2006 01:10 PM | |