 | Aircraft production 1939-45| Aviation Discuss Aircraft production 1939-45 in the World War II - Aviation forums; Found this interesting chart on aircraft production figures for all types for 1939 to 45, apparently from the WW2 Almanac ... |
|
06-08-2006, 12:42 PM
|
#1 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Londonium
Posts: 609
| Aircraft production 1939-45 Found this interesting chart on aircraft production figures for all types for 1939 to 45, apparently from the WW2 Almanac or something, no idea of accuracy but they seem reasonable enough to me and seem to match what I have already heard.
The US seriously kicked into gea, going from lowest here by far in 1939, to tripling production by 1940, then tripling again from '40 to '41, then more than doubling from '41 to '42, almost doubling again from '42 to '43, finally levelling off a bit in '44 and then backing off in '45 obviosuly as the war wound down. You can see the massive industrial might they had at the time, noone else comes close.
US
1939 - 2,141
1940 - 6,086
1941 - 19,433
1942 - 47,836
1943 - 85,898
1944 - 96,318
1945 - 46,001
Total - 303,713
Britain was already cranking them out in 1939 when the war officially started, almost doubling in 1940 during the Battle of Britain, but then only adding a bit each year until they pretty much topped out in 1943/44 at 26K per year, maybe this was their upper limit of production?
Britain
1939 - 7,940
1940 - 15,049
1941 - 20,094
1942 - 23,672
1943 - 26,263
1944 - 26,461
1945 - 12,070
Total - 131,549
The USSR was obviously preparing for a war in '39, 10K per year in 1939 is easily the most aircraft of this lot, only Germany comes close at the time. They seemed to have kept up and even increased production during the early invasion years when they were shfiting production to the urals, then they shifted gear and got into it, though never really made that many compared to the US for example. their peak production in 1944 was not even as much as Germany, though I guess they didn't need so many as they were also being given lots of aircraft via lend lease
USSR
1939 - 10,382
1940 - 10,565
1941 - 15,737
1942 - 25,436
1943 - 34,900
1944 - 40,300
1945 - 20,900
Total - 158,220
Germany was unsuprisingly at fairly high production (comparatively) in '39, suprisingly not increasing production all that much until the later years, you can see them creeing up quite a bit in '43 then a lot in '44, but then of course dropping off considerably in '45 for obvious reasons.
Germany
1939 - 8,295
1940 - 10,826
1941 - 12,401
1942 - 15,409
1943 - 24,807
1944 - 40,593
1945 - 7,540
Total - 119,871
Suprisingly Japans output is quite low, even in the first 3 years when they were quite involved in war on all fronts, even by '42 they are still at quite low production, they start pedalling harder in '43 once they realise they are starting to lose ground, then hitting full speed in '44 like Germany when they probably realise they might in fact lose, then petering out in '45 once they did lose.
Japan
1939 - 4,467
1940 - 4,768
1941 - 5,088
1942 - 8,861
1943 - 16,693
1944 - 28,180
1945 - 8,263
Total - 76,320
Quite interesting really, why didn't Germany or Japan increase production until the later years? Was it overconfidence in victory? or does it take until you are getting hammered and your homeland is under threat to realise you need to pull your finger out? Or was it due to mounting losses that production needed to be upped?
__________________ Never mistake knowledge for wisdom. One helps you make a living; the other helps you make a life. |
| |
06-08-2006, 01:18 PM
|
#2 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 8,614
| Interesting subject.
One thing thats scarey about the US production totals, is it doesnt include all the wastage that was prevalent in starting up production.
In early 1945, the aircraft industry was just "warming" up and there was even more capacity available if needed.
One big reason the US could build so many aircraft is the willingness to use woman in the labor force and there was a vast cadre of managers, engineers and technicians who understood the mass production concept, and readily applied it to area's where it was never tried before.
Japans totals in 1945 were low because of the submarine blockade and B29 raids were destroying their capacity to build anything, let alone aircraft.
__________________ "Pilot to copilot..... what are those mountain goats doing up here in the clouds?" |
| |
06-08-2006, 01:41 PM
|
#3 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 328
| Quote: |
Britain was already cranking them out in 1939 when the war officially started, almost doubling in 1940 during the Battle of Britain, but then only adding a bit each year until they pretty much topped out in 1943/44 at 26K per year, maybe this was their upper limit of production?
| To a certain extent it reflects a change in aircraft types. More heavy bombers in 1944 than 1943. The weight of aircraft produced increased, from 185 million pounds to 208 million.
The production totals from the British Bombing Survey Unit, in million pounds of airframe weight:
US
1941 - 81.36
1942 - 275.83
1943 - 654.19
1944 - 961.12
UK
1941 - 87.25
1942 - 133.38
1943 - 185.25
1944 - 208.47
Germany
1941 - 64.43
1942 - 91.72
1943 - 139.90
1944 - 173.66 |
| |
06-08-2006, 04:40 PM
|
#4 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: London
Posts: 3,026
| This is very interesting. The one that surprised me were the figures for the USSR. I always had them down as producing vast numbers of relatively basic aircraft. To find their numbers in the same basic ballpark as the UK wasn't what I expected. |
| |
06-10-2006, 09:06 AM
|
#5 | | Der Crewchief
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 30,544
Country: | Well one thing this really shows is the capacity that the US had compared to other nations. As for Germany I would say it is because of overconfidence and also a bit of reaching there industrial capacity. I agree with syscom about the Japanese figures.
__________________ US Army Blackhawk Crewchief 2000-2006 Classic ww2aircraft.net quotes: fly boy said: "isn't that the first jet bomber? becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles" "wait what ok who made the b-2 crash come on people that messed up its a b-2" "ah yes the mistel those things are so annoying is games and in real life" |
| |
06-10-2006, 11:33 AM
|
#6 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 8,614
| Can anyone imagine the US figures if by 1945, the Willow Run production concept was used for ALL aircraft types?
__________________ "Pilot to copilot..... what are those mountain goats doing up here in the clouds?" |
| |
06-10-2006, 02:13 PM
|
#7 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Japan
Posts: 459
| Its interesting to see just how the change in focus to single seat fighters allowed German and Japan to massively increase aircraft production.
As far as I can see, there are a few factors behind the decision:
1. Their offensive arms were now fairly impotent in the face of Allied air power,
2. They were desperately trying to regain control of thier own airspace and damage/defeat Allied bombing efforts
3. The capacity of the single seat fighter as a tactical weapon had grown immensly since 1939, particularly as a fighter-bomber. |
| |
06-11-2006, 06:49 PM
|
#8 | | Der Crewchief
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 30,544
Country: | The main reason was to try and stop the allied bombing offensive. Germany however did not completely give up the production of larger multi engine aircraft because Hitler was so damn hell bent on bombing the enemy back.
__________________ US Army Blackhawk Crewchief 2000-2006 Classic ww2aircraft.net quotes: fly boy said: "isn't that the first jet bomber? becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles" "wait what ok who made the b-2 crash come on people that messed up its a b-2" "ah yes the mistel those things are so annoying is games and in real life" |
| |
06-11-2006, 06:56 PM
|
#9 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,876
Country: | I looked at those numbers and was surprised that Canada out did the Italians  by a substanial amount |
| |
06-11-2006, 07:18 PM
|
#10 | | Der Crewchief
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 30,544
Country: | They werent getting bombed and attacked day and night.
__________________ US Army Blackhawk Crewchief 2000-2006 Classic ww2aircraft.net quotes: fly boy said: "isn't that the first jet bomber? becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles" "wait what ok who made the b-2 crash come on people that messed up its a b-2" "ah yes the mistel those things are so annoying is games and in real life" |
| |
06-11-2006, 07:42 PM
|
#11 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,876
Country: | Quote: |
Originally Posted by DerAdlerIstGelandet They werent getting bombed and attacked day and night. | and there was only 11 million of us |
| |
06-12-2006, 07:09 AM
|
#12 | | Der Crewchief
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 30,544
Country: | True
__________________ US Army Blackhawk Crewchief 2000-2006 Classic ww2aircraft.net quotes: fly boy said: "isn't that the first jet bomber? becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles" "wait what ok who made the b-2 crash come on people that messed up its a b-2" "ah yes the mistel those things are so annoying is games and in real life" |
| |
06-12-2006, 09:07 AM
|
#13 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3
Country: | i know this is off the subject but did the ussr outproduce the us in tank production they rally had a lot of t34's rolling around |
| |
06-12-2006, 10:43 AM
|
#14 | | Der Crewchief
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 30,544
Country: | The USSR only survived because of Lend Lease from the US.
__________________ US Army Blackhawk Crewchief 2000-2006 Classic ww2aircraft.net quotes: fly boy said: "isn't that the first jet bomber? becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles" "wait what ok who made the b-2 crash come on people that messed up its a b-2" "ah yes the mistel those things are so annoying is games and in real life" |
| |
06-12-2006, 11:13 AM
|
#15 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: City of the Angels California
Posts: 809
| Hmm, yeah? What are tank productions numbers for the countries? All those "Free" 1 1/2 and duece and a half trucks we sent allowed them to concentrate on T-34s instead. 
__________________ |
| | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:29 PM. |  | |