Aircraft production 1939-45 - Aircraft of World War II

R988 · 06-08-2006, 01:42 PM

Found this interesting chart on aircraft production figures for all types for 1939 to 45, apparently from the WW2 Almanac or something, no idea of accuracy but they seem reasonable enough to me and seem to match what I have already heard.

The US seriously kicked into gea, going from lowest here by far in 1939, to tripling production by 1940, then tripling again from '40 to '41, then more than doubling from '41 to '42, almost doubling again from '42 to '43, finally levelling off a bit in '44 and then backing off in '45 obviosuly as the war wound down. You can see the massive industrial might they had at the time, noone else comes close.

US

1939 - 2,141
1940 - 6,086
1941 - 19,433
1942 - 47,836
1943 - 85,898
1944 - 96,318
1945 - 46,001
Total - 303,713

Britain was already cranking them out in 1939 when the war officially started, almost doubling in 1940 during the Battle of Britain, but then only adding a bit each year until they pretty much topped out in 1943/44 at 26K per year, maybe this was their upper limit of production?

Britain

1939 - 7,940
1940 - 15,049
1941 - 20,094
1942 - 23,672
1943 - 26,263
1944 - 26,461
1945 - 12,070
Total - 131,549

The USSR was obviously preparing for a war in '39, 10K per year in 1939 is easily the most aircraft of this lot, only Germany comes close at the time. They seemed to have kept up and even increased production during the early invasion years when they were shfiting production to the urals, then they shifted gear and got into it, though never really made that many compared to the US for example. their peak production in 1944 was not even as much as Germany, though I guess they didn't need so many as they were also being given lots of aircraft via lend lease

USSR

1939 - 10,382
1940 - 10,565
1941 - 15,737
1942 - 25,436
1943 - 34,900
1944 - 40,300
1945 - 20,900
Total - 158,220

Germany was unsuprisingly at fairly high production (comparatively) in '39, suprisingly not increasing production all that much until the later years, you can see them creeing up quite a bit in '43 then a lot in '44, but then of course dropping off considerably in '45 for obvious reasons.

Germany

1939 - 8,295
1940 - 10,826
1941 - 12,401
1942 - 15,409
1943 - 24,807
1944 - 40,593
1945 - 7,540
Total - 119,871

Suprisingly Japans output is quite low, even in the first 3 years when they were quite involved in war on all fronts, even by '42 they are still at quite low production, they start pedalling harder in '43 once they realise they are starting to lose ground, then hitting full speed in '44 like Germany when they probably realise they might in fact lose, then petering out in '45 once they did lose.

Japan

1939 - 4,467
1940 - 4,768
1941 - 5,088
1942 - 8,861
1943 - 16,693
1944 - 28,180
1945 - 8,263
Total - 76,320

Quite interesting really, why didn't Germany or Japan increase production until the later years? Was it overconfidence in victory? or does it take until you are getting hammered and your homeland is under threat to realise you need to pull your finger out? Or was it due to mounting losses that production needed to be upped?

syscom3 · 06-08-2006, 02:18 PM

Interesting subject.

One thing thats scarey about the US production totals, is it doesnt include all the wastage that was prevalent in starting up production.

In early 1945, the aircraft industry was just "warming" up and there was even more capacity available if needed.

One big reason the US could build so many aircraft is the willingness to use woman in the labor force and there was a vast cadre of managers, engineers and technicians who understood the mass production concept, and readily applied it to area's where it was never tried before.

Japans totals in 1945 were low because of the submarine blockade and B29 raids were destroying their capacity to build anything, let alone aircraft.

Hop · 06-08-2006, 02:41 PM

Quote:

Britain was already cranking them out in 1939 when the war officially started, almost doubling in 1940 during the Battle of Britain, but then only adding a bit each year until they pretty much topped out in 1943/44 at 26K per year, maybe this was their upper limit of production?

To a certain extent it reflects a change in aircraft types. More heavy bombers in 1944 than 1943. The weight of aircraft produced increased, from 185 million pounds to 208 million.

The production totals from the British Bombing Survey Unit, in million pounds of airframe weight:

US
1941 - 81.36
1942 - 275.83
1943 - 654.19
1944 - 961.12

UK
1941 - 87.25
1942 - 133.38
1943 - 185.25
1944 - 208.47

Germany
1941 - 64.43
1942 - 91.72
1943 - 139.90
1944 - 173.66

Glider · 06-08-2006, 05:40 PM

This is very interesting. The one that surprised me were the figures for the USSR. I always had them down as producing vast numbers of relatively basic aircraft. To find their numbers in the same basic ballpark as the UK wasn't what I expected.

DerAdlerIstGelandet · 06-10-2006, 10:06 AM

Well one thing this really shows is the capacity that the US had compared to other nations. As for Germany I would say it is because of overconfidence and also a bit of reaching there industrial capacity. I agree with syscom about the Japanese figures.

syscom3 · 06-10-2006, 12:33 PM

Can anyone imagine the US figures if by 1945, the Willow Run production concept was used for ALL aircraft types?

Jabberwocky · 06-10-2006, 03:13 PM

Its interesting to see just how the change in focus to single seat fighters allowed German and Japan to massively increase aircraft production.

As far as I can see, there are a few factors behind the decision:

1. Their offensive arms were now fairly impotent in the face of Allied air power,

2. They were desperately trying to regain control of thier own airspace and damage/defeat Allied bombing efforts

3. The capacity of the single seat fighter as a tactical weapon had grown immensly since 1939, particularly as a fighter-bomber.

DerAdlerIstGelandet · 06-11-2006, 07:49 PM

The main reason was to try and stop the allied bombing offensive. Germany however did not completely give up the production of larger multi engine aircraft because Hitler was so damn hell bent on bombing the enemy back.

pbfoot · 06-11-2006, 07:56 PM

I looked at those numbers and was surprised that Canada out did the Italians

by a substanial amount

DerAdlerIstGelandet · 06-11-2006, 08:18 PM

They werent getting bombed and attacked day and night.

pbfoot · 06-11-2006, 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DerAdlerIstGelandet

They werent getting bombed and attacked day and night.

and there was only 11 million of us

DerAdlerIstGelandet · 06-12-2006, 08:09 AM

True

ricardox · 06-12-2006, 10:07 AM

i know this is off the subject but did the ussr outproduce the us in tank production they rally had a lot of t34's rolling around

DerAdlerIstGelandet · 06-12-2006, 11:43 AM

The USSR only survived because of Lend Lease from the US.

Twitch · 06-12-2006, 12:13 PM

Hmm, yeah? What are tank productions numbers for the countries? All those "Free" 1 1/2 and duece and a half trucks we sent allowed them to concentrate on T-34s instead.

06-08-2006, 01:42 PM	#1
R988 Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Londonium Posts: 609	Aircraft production 1939-45 Found this interesting chart on aircraft production figures for all types for 1939 to 45, apparently from the WW2 Almanac or something, no idea of accuracy but they seem reasonable enough to me and seem to match what I have already heard. The US seriously kicked into gea, going from lowest here by far in 1939, to tripling production by 1940, then tripling again from '40 to '41, then more than doubling from '41 to '42, almost doubling again from '42 to '43, finally levelling off a bit in '44 and then backing off in '45 obviosuly as the war wound down. You can see the massive industrial might they had at the time, noone else comes close. US 1939 - 2,141 1940 - 6,086 1941 - 19,433 1942 - 47,836 1943 - 85,898 1944 - 96,318 1945 - 46,001 Total - 303,713 Britain was already cranking them out in 1939 when the war officially started, almost doubling in 1940 during the Battle of Britain, but then only adding a bit each year until they pretty much topped out in 1943/44 at 26K per year, maybe this was their upper limit of production? Britain 1939 - 7,940 1940 - 15,049 1941 - 20,094 1942 - 23,672 1943 - 26,263 1944 - 26,461 1945 - 12,070 Total - 131,549 The USSR was obviously preparing for a war in '39, 10K per year in 1939 is easily the most aircraft of this lot, only Germany comes close at the time. They seemed to have kept up and even increased production during the early invasion years when they were shfiting production to the urals, then they shifted gear and got into it, though never really made that many compared to the US for example. their peak production in 1944 was not even as much as Germany, though I guess they didn't need so many as they were also being given lots of aircraft via lend lease USSR 1939 - 10,382 1940 - 10,565 1941 - 15,737 1942 - 25,436 1943 - 34,900 1944 - 40,300 1945 - 20,900 Total - 158,220 Germany was unsuprisingly at fairly high production (comparatively) in '39, suprisingly not increasing production all that much until the later years, you can see them creeing up quite a bit in '43 then a lot in '44, but then of course dropping off considerably in '45 for obvious reasons. Germany 1939 - 8,295 1940 - 10,826 1941 - 12,401 1942 - 15,409 1943 - 24,807 1944 - 40,593 1945 - 7,540 Total - 119,871 Suprisingly Japans output is quite low, even in the first 3 years when they were quite involved in war on all fronts, even by '42 they are still at quite low production, they start pedalling harder in '43 once they realise they are starting to lose ground, then hitting full speed in '44 like Germany when they probably realise they might in fact lose, then petering out in '45 once they did lose. Japan 1939 - 4,467 1940 - 4,768 1941 - 5,088 1942 - 8,861 1943 - 16,693 1944 - 28,180 1945 - 8,263 Total - 76,320 Quite interesting really, why didn't Germany or Japan increase production until the later years? Was it overconfidence in victory? or does it take until you are getting hammered and your homeland is under threat to realise you need to pull your finger out? Or was it due to mounting losses that production needed to be upped? __________________ Never mistake knowledge for wisdom. One helps you make a living; the other helps you make a life.

06-08-2006, 02:18 PM	#2
syscom3 Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Orange County, CA Posts: 10,283	Interesting subject. One thing thats scarey about the US production totals, is it doesnt include all the wastage that was prevalent in starting up production. In early 1945, the aircraft industry was just "warming" up and there was even more capacity available if needed. One big reason the US could build so many aircraft is the willingness to use woman in the labor force and there was a vast cadre of managers, engineers and technicians who understood the mass production concept, and readily applied it to area's where it was never tried before. Japans totals in 1945 were low because of the submarine blockade and B29 raids were destroying their capacity to build anything, let alone aircraft. __________________ "Pilot to copilot..... what are those mountain goats doing up here in the clouds?"

06-10-2006, 10:06 AM	#5
DerAdlerIstGelandet Der Crewchief Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ansbach, Germany Posts: 33,152	Well one thing this really shows is the capacity that the US had compared to other nations. As for Germany I would say it is because of overconfidence and also a bit of reaching there industrial capacity. I agree with syscom about the Japanese figures. __________________ fly boy:"isnt that the first jet bomber becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"[/I]

06-10-2006, 12:33 PM	#6
syscom3 Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Orange County, CA Posts: 10,283	Can anyone imagine the US figures if by 1945, the Willow Run production concept was used for ALL aircraft types? __________________ "Pilot to copilot..... what are those mountain goats doing up here in the clouds?"

06-11-2006, 07:49 PM	#8
DerAdlerIstGelandet Der Crewchief Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ansbach, Germany Posts: 33,152	The main reason was to try and stop the allied bombing offensive. Germany however did not completely give up the production of larger multi engine aircraft because Hitler was so damn hell bent on bombing the enemy back. __________________ fly boy:"isnt that the first jet bomber becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"[/I]

06-08-2006, 05:40 PM	#4
Glider Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: London Posts: 3,655	This is very interesting. The one that surprised me were the figures for the USSR. I always had them down as producing vast numbers of relatively basic aircraft. To find their numbers in the same basic ballpark as the UK wasn't what I expected.

06-10-2006, 03:13 PM	#7
Jabberwocky Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Japan Posts: 494	Its interesting to see just how the change in focus to single seat fighters allowed German and Japan to massively increase aircraft production. As far as I can see, there are a few factors behind the decision: 1. Their offensive arms were now fairly impotent in the face of Allied air power, 2. They were desperately trying to regain control of thier own airspace and damage/defeat Allied bombing efforts 3. The capacity of the single seat fighter as a tactical weapon had grown immensly since 1939, particularly as a fighter-bomber.

06-11-2006, 07:56 PM	#9
pbfoot Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: niagara falls Posts: 5,586	I looked at those numbers and was surprised that Canada out did the Italians by a substanial amount

06-11-2006, 08:18 PM	#10
DerAdlerIstGelandet Der Crewchief Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ansbach, Germany Posts: 33,152	They werent getting bombed and attacked day and night. __________________ fly boy:"isnt that the first jet bomber becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"[/I]

06-12-2006, 08:09 AM	#12
DerAdlerIstGelandet Der Crewchief Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ansbach, Germany Posts: 33,152	True __________________ fly boy:"isnt that the first jet bomber becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"[/I]

06-12-2006, 10:07 AM	#13
ricardox Junior Member Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 3	i know this is off the subject but did the ussr outproduce the us in tank production they rally had a lot of t34's rolling around

06-12-2006, 11:43 AM	#14
DerAdlerIstGelandet Der Crewchief Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ansbach, Germany Posts: 33,152	The USSR only survived because of Lend Lease from the US. __________________ fly boy:"isnt that the first jet bomber becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"[/I]

06-12-2006, 12:13 PM	#15
Twitch Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: City of the Angels California Posts: 809	Hmm, yeah? What are tank productions numbers for the countries? All those "Free" 1 1/2 and duece and a half trucks we sent allowed them to concentrate on T-34s instead. __________________

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
French fighter aircrft	carpenoctem1689	Aviation	56	02-25-2009 11:41 AM
Carriers!!	MP-Willow	WW2 General	275	01-28-2007 08:25 PM
RAF Bomber Command Diary... Jan 1945......	lesofprimus	Aviation	54	01-28-2007 02:29 PM
Lancaster Vs. B-24	the lancaster kicks ass	Polls	506	10-30-2006 04:34 PM
The Misadventures of Ivan Kozhedub's Famous "White 27&q	lesofprimus	Stories	4	12-14-2004 01:14 PM