Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums
 



Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > World War II - Aviation > Aviation

Aviation Discussion on the aircraft of WWII.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-30-2005, 12:22 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
DAVIDICUS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 916
Armor Penetration - 20mm vs. .50 cal.

Specifically, the 20mm Hispano II and the .50 BMG.

1) What is the armor penetration of each with armor piercing ammunition?

I believe the .50 BMG has a higher sectional density and roughly equal velocity at the muzzle. In adition, it's ballistic coefficient allows it to retain velocity better.
__________________
.
-=DAVIDICUS MAXIMUS=-
.

.
.
www.nightchicken.com
.
.
DAVIDICUS is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2005, 01:57 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
DAVIDICUS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 916
I have read that a .50 BMG AP round can penetrate .9" of face hardened armor plate at 200 meters and .5" of face hardened armor plate at 600 meters.

I can't seem to find anything on the 20mm.
__________________
.
-=DAVIDICUS MAXIMUS=-
.

.
.
www.nightchicken.com
.
.
DAVIDICUS is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2005, 06:12 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
CharlesBronson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cordoba - Argentina
Posts: 3,228
Send a message via MSN to CharlesBronson
Some old documents about this issue.

.303, .50 and 20 mm Hispano included.




CharlesBronson is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2005, 06:26 PM   #4
Anonymous
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
LOL - was just about to post those. If I hadn't gone in and cut them down to save space, I'd have posted um first!

=S=

Lunatic
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2005, 08:42 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
DAVIDICUS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 916
Thanks. I'm always learning something new on this forum.
__________________
.
-=DAVIDICUS MAXIMUS=-
.

.
.
www.nightchicken.com
.
.
DAVIDICUS is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2005, 01:49 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
the lancaster kicks ass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,925
Send a message via MSN to the lancaster kicks ass
wow that's great info, it's amazing to see how, at 0 degrees the difference between 20mm and .50cal is 7mm armour penitration, but by the time you get to a 40 degree angle the difference in armour penitration is 11mm!!!
__________________

"Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy."
the lancaster kicks ass is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2005, 09:10 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
DAVIDICUS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 916
Surprised me too.

I thought the .50 would have greater penetration due to its higher sectional density. (At least head on.)
__________________
.
-=DAVIDICUS MAXIMUS=-
.

.
.
www.nightchicken.com
.
.
DAVIDICUS is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2005, 11:09 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
the lancaster kicks ass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,925
Send a message via MSN to the lancaster kicks ass
well it's never gonne beat a 20mm..............
__________________

"Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy."
the lancaster kicks ass is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2005, 11:42 AM   #9
Anonymous
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by DAVIDICUS
Surprised me too.

I thought the .50 would have greater penetration due to its higher sectional density. (At least head on.)
Actually, if you think about it, it does. It penetrates 20mm vs. 27mm for the 20mm AP, but only has about 40% of the mass of the 20mm. "Head on", sectional density helps as the energy is focused on a smaller area, but once the angle starts diverging from perpendicular, the total mass becomes more relevant.

=S=

Lunatic
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2005, 04:58 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
DAVIDICUS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 916
I am trying to figure out whether eight .50 cal.'s would have been as effective as four 20mm's for ground attack against moderately armored vehicles and ground positions.

I assumed they would have been but now I don't think so.
__________________
.
-=DAVIDICUS MAXIMUS=-
.

.
.
www.nightchicken.com
.
.
DAVIDICUS is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2005, 10:18 PM   #11
Anonymous
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I think the answer is clearly yes. The area of coverage was higher, and the number of rounds carried was higher, typicaly 4 times as much. The .50's could easily destroy most half tracks.

It should be noted however that the Japanese specifically created many of their bunkers and pill boxes to be resistant to .50 fire, and against such targets 20mm were much more effective. However, the Germans tended to reinforce most of their positions to be tough enough to withstand either weapon.

Against most ground targets, the .50's were sufficient. Eight .50's with a total of 2400-3200 rounds had many advantages, and a few disadvantages, over four 20mm with 500-600 rounds.

=S=

Lunatic
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2005, 01:39 AM   #12
Senior Member
 
the lancaster kicks ass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,925
Send a message via MSN to the lancaster kicks ass
but when it comes down to it there are targets that 8x.50cal can't take out that the 4x20mm can, that's when you wish you had the 20mm............
__________________

"Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy."
the lancaster kicks ass is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2005, 12:21 PM   #13
Anonymous
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by the lancaster kicks ass
but when it comes down to it there are targets that 8x.50cal can't take out that the 4x20mm can, that's when you wish you had the 20mm............
Yes but they are relatively few. Most targets that can be taken out with 4 x 20mm can be taken out with 8 x .50's, though in some cases it will take more time on target to do it.


On the other hand, most targets can be taken out with 8 x .50's and the 20mm are just overkill. The reduced duration of fire means more sorties to achieve the same results. More sorties means lower odds of survival.

=S=

Lunatic
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2005, 12:26 PM   #14
Banned
 
Soren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,625
As soon as any significant slant is applied to the target-armor, the .50 cal quickly looses its advantage !
Soren is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2005, 12:56 PM   #15
Anonymous
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soren
As soon as any significant slant is applied to the target-armor, the .50 cal quickly looses its advantage !
Most ground targets had less than 6mm of armor. Against that much armor the .50 is effective up to pretty severe angles. Also, most "armor" on most ground targets was not face-hardened plate, and the .50 cuts through softer steel pretty well even at high angles.

Finally, while it is true that there are plates that a .50 will not penetrate that a 20mm will, very multiple .50 hits will penetrate that same plate. The beaten zone of the .50 BMG was much tighter than that of the Hispano 20mm, and with more guns firing, the chances of scoring multiple hits within a one foot radius were pretty good.

=S=

Lunatic
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:51 AM.
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
Ad Management plugin by RedTyger
Design by HTWoRKS


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133