ADS NOT DISPLAYED TO REGISTERED USERS.
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 24

B-17 Canard?

Aviation Discuss B-17 Canard? in the World War II - Aviation forums; While poring through images trying to answer quizes I came across a pic of a B-17 in canard configuration, this ...

  1. #1
    Member Tankworks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    British Columbia
    Posts
    88
    Country
    Canada

    B-17 Canard?

    While poring through images trying to answer quizes I came across a pic of a B-17 in canard configuration, this is a photoshopped hoax, right?


  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Rancho Cucamonga, California, U.S.A.
    Posts
    1,797
    Country
    United States
    Yes

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Schiedam, Holland
    Posts
    177
    Country
    Netherlands
    Would be interesting to have a modeller come up with a flying model though?

  4. #4
    Senior Member N4521U's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Botany Bay
    Posts
    5,597
    Country
    Australia
    Country II
    United States
    Has anyone ever considered how big that canard would have to be?
    The size, position and shape of the wing in the rear?
    For the loads to be carried?

    Would be interesting to make these applications to the existing airframe, would it not?
    How would the spar be fitted thru the fuselage?

    I was fortunate enough to go for a ride in a Long Easy, what a great machine. I'm only 6', but we had to take all the padding of the seat so as not to hit the canopy with me noggin!

    Anyone?
    Last edited by N4521U; 06-21-2012 at 08:18 AM.

    Planes are so simple....... damned helicopter builds!



  5. #5
    Member Tankworks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    British Columbia
    Posts
    88
    Country
    Canada
    I had not heard of that one so had to look it up. It looks like you would just strap it on!

  6. #6
    Senior Member model299's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Minnysoder
    Posts
    155
    Country
    United States
    The singer John Denver was killed when he crashed a Long Eze.
    Last edited by model299; 06-21-2012 at 09:19 PM. Reason: See FLYBOYJ's post below

  7. #7
    Senior Member davparlr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    2,550
    Country
    United States
    Quote Originally Posted by model299 View Post
    The singer John Denver was killed when he crashed a Long Eze that he shouldn't have been flying. He wasn't checked out in it yet.
    There were a lot more problems than this, including poor cockpit layout and failure to fill up the plane. He had many hours and many ratings.

  8. #8
    IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO FLYBOYJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Colorado, USA
    Posts
    20,670
    Country
    United States
    Quote Originally Posted by model299 View Post
    The singer John Denver was killed when he crashed a Long Eze that he shouldn't have been flying. He wasn't checked out in it yet.



    100% NOT TRUE.

    The story about him not having a check out is a myth. He did have a check out as stated in the accident report. Denver had over 2,700 hours in various aircraft and even held a type rating in a Learjet. He was multi-engine rated and held and an instrument rating, glider and seaplane rating. He did receive a checkout the day prior to the accident which was about 30 minutes and should be considered appropriate for a pilot of Denver's experience. What killed Denver was the inability of being able to transfer fuel from one tank to another due to the location of the fuel transfer valve which was placed for some crazy reason, at the pilot's left shoulder area. Even the gauges were positioned there which was totally crazy. Denver and his mechanic talked about repositioning the fuel transfer valve between the pilot's legs where it is normally located and it was also noted the valve was very hard to move. Denver went out with half tanks and the mistake that killed him was not topping off prior to flight and of course not being able to switch fuel tanks.

    The plane should never been certificated by the DER or FAA PMI who issued the airworthiness certificate because of this condition with the fuel transfer valve. Denver is also responsible for inadequately understanding the systems limitation of his aircraft. This was inherent in that particular aircraft's construction and no additional checkout would have corrected the hazard potential of this manufacturing flaw.

    The NTSB did mention "transition training" which considering the types of aircraft Denver had flown was pretty ridiculous. I think mentioning this was pretty naive by the NTSB because this aircraft is extremely simple to fly and the author of the accident report probably never flown a Long-Eze. Denver did not have a valid medical because of prior drunk driving arrest and should not have been flying period - based on that fact, not his ability to fly a Long-Eze

  9. #9
    Senior Member model299's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Minnysoder
    Posts
    155
    Country
    United States
    I stand corrected. Thanks FLYBOYJ. Next time I'll do a bit more reseach before zipping a post off.

  10. #10
    IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO FLYBOYJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Colorado, USA
    Posts
    20,670
    Country
    United States
    No worries - I knew people who worked on this accident. As usual the media did a terrific job covering it.

  11. #11
    Senior Member model299's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Minnysoder
    Posts
    155
    Country
    United States
    Quote Originally Posted by FLYBOYJ View Post
    ..................As usual the media did a terrific job covering it.


    Yeah, a great job. Speaking of canards, eh???

  12. #12
    Senior Member N4521U's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Botany Bay
    Posts
    5,597
    Country
    Australia
    Country II
    United States
    The Long Eze, based on my only ride in one and being handed the controls for take of and cruise, is just a beautiful plane to fly. It slides thru the air. In banking, you have to correct the bank or it will continue sliding.

    The only problem with homebuilts, IMHO, is the builder, some certified idiots, put things like the fuel transfer valve wherever they bloody well please, no rhyme or reason. Same applies to Eagles or Ezes, Lance Aires. I've been in a lot of them. I knew one fellow had punched a hole in the rear fuselage of his plane, went to the hardware and got a small sheet of ordinary aluminum and patched it with pop rivets. Didn't find out about this till after a flight in it and he wanted to show me a split S. He owned the plane, not even a license to fly it!

    I remember the Denver accident, it was just waiting to happen. Sometimes you just gotta shake your head.

    Planes are so simple....... damned helicopter builds!



  13. #13
    IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO FLYBOYJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Colorado, USA
    Posts
    20,670
    Country
    United States
    Quote Originally Posted by N4521U View Post
    The Long Eze, based on my only ride in one and being handed the controls for take of and cruise, is just a beautiful plane to fly. It slides thru the air. In banking, you have to correct the bank or it will continue sliding.

    The only problem with homebuilts, IMHO, is the builder, some certified idiots, put things like the fuel transfer valve wherever they bloody well please, no rhyme or reason. Same applies to Eagles or Ezes, Lance Aires. I've been in a lot of them. I knew one fellow had punched a hole in the rear fuselage of his plane, went to the hardware and got a small sheet of ordinary aluminum and patched it with pop rivets. Didn't find out about this till after a flight in it and he wanted to show me a split S. He owned the plane, not even a license to fly it!

    I remember the Denver accident, it was just waiting to happen. Sometimes you just gotta shake your head.
    As stated earlier - you'll find builders who do some pretty stupid things. When the aircraft is inspected for issuance of its airworthiness certificate it's up to the DER or the FAA PMI to ensure things like this aren't allowed to exist on the aircraft and in the case with Denver, it led to a fatality.

    The fellow you mention - if he's not licensed he's breaking the law. Is he an A&P? If he is not having yearly condition inspections done by either an A&P or if he's not the designated builder/ repairman who is authorized to inspect and do repairs on the aircraft, that's a double whammy. Depending where the hole is in the fuselage may not be a big deal as fiberglass is pretty resilient but he not having a license makes me wonder. Stay clear of that guy, he may be a smoking hole waiting to happen.

  14. #14
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    3
    Country
    United States
    Definitly a hoax. I have seen the background of that same photo on the original (un-canarded B-17) pic.

  15. #15
    Senior Member N4521U's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Botany Bay
    Posts
    5,597
    Country
    Australia
    Country II
    United States
    I guess I was a little unclear about the plane and repair in question. This one happened to be an all metal aircraft. Can't for the life of me remember the name. Low wing, tandem 2 seater, tricycle, 100 hp, the logo is like a little American Indian doll.

    He had punched a hole in the rear underside below the horiz stab. He owned the plane, had taken lessons but never finished, I didn't find out till long after the flight. Not hardly an A&P. The repair was caught at the next "inspection", only because he decided to have "other" work done and the repairer wouldn't give him the plane back unless it, and other issues were corrected.

    The Lancair flight was magic. The builder put a sharp ended taper on all the control surfaces, his story. This made the controls a little more weighty, he wanted a fighter plane feel to it. Man was that little plastic plane fast, and a thrill to fly.

    I was a ramp tramp around this time, and everyone and their brother was willing to take me flying. All I had to do was letter their plane! One of the true benefits of being a sign painter!

    Planes are so simple....... damned helicopter builds!



+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. JAS 39 Gripen is growing up....
    By Lucky13 in forum Modern
    Replies: 42
    Last Post: 07-22-2012, 05:51 AM
  2. MW-50 Bf 109s Vs Fw 190 A
    By Jenisch in forum Aviation
    Replies: 186
    Last Post: 04-05-2012, 11:19 AM
  3. Engine quastion about He-177
    By rousseau in forum Engines
    Replies: 46
    Last Post: 03-18-2012, 09:25 PM
  4. Could you have designed a better Warbird?
    By Burmese Bandit in forum Aviation
    Replies: 393
    Last Post: 03-02-2011, 07:57 AM
  5. Yu-supersonic
    By imalko in forum Modern
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 09-06-2009, 08:27 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88