Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums
 



Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > World War II - Aviation > Aviation

Aviation Discussion on the aircraft of WWII.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-03-2009, 06:02 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
B-17engineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 5,689
Send a message via AIM to B-17engineer
B-24 refueling B-17

Does anybody have info on this picture.?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg b-24-refuel-b-17.jpg (62.8 KB, 57 views)
B-17engineer is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2009, 06:25 PM   #2
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 35
B-24D Refueling a B-17E
A Consolidated B-24D Liberator and a Boeing B-17E Flying Fortress using the looped-hose method of refueling.

A Consolidated B-24D Liberator and a Boeing B-17E Flying Fortress using the looped-hose method of refueling.

After the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941 the U.S. Army Air Forces began to study methods to extend the range of its bomber aircraft. The Army chose the looped-hose aerial refueling system that had been patented by British Flight Lieutenant Richard Atcherley in September 1934. The American version featured improvements over the original British version such as a carbon dioxide purging system to reduce the risk of fire. Prior to the refueling rendezvous both the receiver and tanker would trail a cable with a grapnel hook. The cables had a 2,000 lb rating which was increased from 1,300 lb rated cable used in the British system due to increased refueling airspeed and resulting airloads. As the receiver flew straight and level, the tanker would fly slightly above, behind, and offset to one side. The tanker would then cross over from one side to the other and the cables would become hooked together. Once the cables were attached the tanker used an electric winch to reel in the bomber’s cable which was then attached to the transfer hose. After the hose was attached to the bomber’s cable (and the tanker’s cable detangeled from the bomber’s cable) the bomber used a hydraulically powered winch to pull the 235′ fuel hose to its receptacle. Once the connection was made the tanker would ascend slightly and allow gravity transfer of fuel to begin.

Using this system, 1,500 gallons of fuel could be gravity transferred in 18 minutes. The indicated airspeed during the operation was 150 miles per hour.

Testing between a Boeing B-17E receiver and a Consolidated B-24D tanker began in the summer of 1943 at Eglin Field, Fla. The successful tests extended the B-17’s range (with three tons of bombs) from 1,000 to 1,500 miles. This refueling method was demonstrated to the Army Air Forces Board in January of 1944 but they rejected the system since they did not percieve a tactical need for air refueling at the time.
herman1rg is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2009, 06:33 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
B-17engineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 5,689
Send a message via AIM to B-17engineer
Wow, that's really interesting thanks!!
B-17engineer is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2009, 08:01 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,766
Just wondering
how many B-24s would it take to refuel a bomber stream's worth of B-17s?
Accident probability in the event of operational deployment must have looked horrendous, unlike today, there were literally hundreds of aircraft up there, all ducking in and out of cables, grappling hooks and each other.

I can't picture a workable solution here.
Colin1 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2009, 08:05 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
B-17engineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 5,689
Send a message via AIM to B-17engineer
Yea, that'd be extremely hard. I wonder what the crew was, just a pilot, copilot and someone to operate the winch?
B-17engineer is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2009, 08:07 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
syscom3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 10,283
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colin1 View Post
Just wondering
how many B-24s would it take to refuel a bomber stream's worth of B-17s?
Accident probability in the event of operational deployment must have looked horrendous, unlike today, there were literally hundreds of aircraft up there, all ducking in and out of cables, grappling hooks and each other.

I can't picture a workable solution here.
This would have come in very handy for "in air refueling" for B24's and B17's to be used in very long range ASW patrols and long range ferry flights.
__________________
"Pilot to copilot..... what are those mountain goats doing up here in the clouds?"
syscom3 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2009, 08:08 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,766
Quote:
Originally Posted by syscom3 View Post
This would have come in very handy for "in air refueling" for B24's and B17's to be used in very long range ASW patrols and long range ferry flights.
Ahh OK then
so not really designed with strategic bombing in mind
Colin1 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:53 AM.
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Ad Management plugin by RedTyger
Design by HTWoRKS


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118