Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums
 



Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > World War II - Aviation > Aviation

Aviation Discussion on the aircraft of WWII.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-16-2005, 02:35 PM   #16
IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
 
FLYBOYJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 16,050
Thanks Dave! I wonder where Uncle Bill came up with this "Radar Sight?" Maybe it was used in the B-50?
__________________
"IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT"
FLYBOYJ is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2005, 03:38 PM   #17
Senior Member
 
syscom3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 10,279
The gunners had to have nerves of steel to be able to calmly operate that range knob, while the incoming fighters were lining up and firing at them.

I wonder if they brought along a change of underwear.
__________________
"Pilot to copilot..... what are those mountain goats doing up here in the clouds?"
syscom3 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2005, 04:08 PM   #18
IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
 
FLYBOYJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 16,050
Quote:
Originally Posted by syscom3
The gunners had to have nerves of steel to be able to calmly operate that range knob, while the incoming fighters were lining up and firing at them.

I wonder if they brought along a change of underwear.
Especially against the MiG-15!

I'm still researching this turret radar thing. I remember reading it on other occasions....
__________________
"IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT"
FLYBOYJ is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2005, 04:41 PM   #19
Senior Member
 
DaveB.inVa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 224
Ive seen a lot of websites quote that they were radar controlled but I've never saw anything to back it up. The B-50 was pretty much the same as the B-29 in the gunnery department, except the B-50 had that fancy streamlined top turret. Actually from Block-40 up B-29A's came with the streamlined turret as well. (The B-29A is also a cause of a lot of debate because a lot of sources state the A had a wingspan 1 foot greater than the other models. Thats another falsehood.)

Theres a guy on the B-29 Yahoo group named Frank Farrell who was a Korean War blister gunner. He has stated many times that they weren't to fire on the MiG's. Also when the MiG's came around most bombing was shifted to nighttime work. He said most times then that the Radar operator would track the incoming aircraft and they could watch for them, but most times at night you didn't know where they really were until you saw the fire from the jet as it went past the B-29. Farrell has a great book that I can recommend called "NO SWEAT". Its surely a good story about a Korean War blister gunner. FBJ seeing that your uncle was just that I'd say you would really enjoy it!!
__________________
Fighter pilots make movies....
Bomber pilots make history!
DaveB.inVa is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2005, 04:52 PM   #20
IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
 
FLYBOYJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 16,050
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveB.inVa
Ive seen a lot of websites quote that they were radar controlled but I've never saw anything to back it up. The B-50 was pretty much the same as the B-29 in the gunnery department, except the B-50 had that fancy streamlined top turret. Actually from Block-40 up B-29A's came with the streamlined turret as well. (The B-29A is also a cause of a lot of debate because a lot of sources state the A had a wingspan 1 foot greater than the other models. Thats another falsehood.)

Theres a guy on the B-29 Yahoo group named Frank Farrell who was a Korean War blister gunner. He has stated many times that they weren't to fire on the MiG's. Also when the MiG's came around most bombing was shifted to nighttime work. He said most times then that the Radar operator would track the incoming aircraft and they could watch for them, but most times at night you didn't know where they really were until you saw the fire from the jet as it went past the B-29. Farrell has a great book that I can recommend called "NO SWEAT". Its surely a good story about a Korean War blister gunner. FBJ seeing that your uncle was just that I'd say you would really enjoy it!!
Great stuff Dave, I've got to get that book! Maybe the error about the B-29 turrests being radar control lies with the installation of the AN/APG-15As radar installed in the tail. As mentioned earlier I know when he was shot down, it was in the daytime, so it might of been during the April 51' raids. He did speak of some tail gunners in his squadron downing MiGs and he also spoke about knowing an F-82 pilot who shot down a YAK-9. It seems he was there early in the war...

I know my Uncle was a Radio Operator, perhaps he could of been talking about operating the radar with regards to sighting or tracking MiGs?

He did mention he did "go into" the forward gun position a lot as it was right next to his radio operator's station, he said he did that because they didn't have a full crew for some missions....

I don't know if you saw the thread I started about him, here's a photo of him getting reday to fly a ferret mission in a B-50 after the Korean War.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg uncle_bill_b50_815.jpg (35.5 KB, 353 views)
__________________
"IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT"
FLYBOYJ is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2005, 05:15 PM   #21
IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
 
FLYBOYJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 16,050
I keep coming up with an AN/APG-8 gun sight radar being referenced to the B-29. Could these been incorporated into the B-29 turret gunsights?
__________________
"IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT"
FLYBOYJ is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2005, 05:25 PM   #22
IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
 
FLYBOYJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 16,050
Got this from another site....

"All Gunners hy gyroscopic lead computing sights with stadiametric
ranging. As the Gunner tracked teh target, the gyroscopes measured
the rate of movement of the target in Azimuth and Elevation, The
Gunner would also track teh target in range, by using a "Motorcycle
throttle" type grip in the sight to size a ring of dots in the sight
picture to match the airplane's wingspan. Since the wingspan of an
attacking fighter would be known, or estimated slose enough, this
would give Range and Range Rate (Closing speed) information to hte
sight.

To add to this fine explanation, starting right around the beginning
of 1945, AN/APG-15 radars started making there way in B-29s. This was
a fairly small, cheap set that took much of the guesswork for figuring
range out of the gunners hands (although they could always go back to
the manual method, especially when the radars broke down)."
__________________
"IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT"
FLYBOYJ is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2005, 06:14 PM   #23
Senior Member
 
DaveB.inVa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 224
The AN/APG-15 was the tail radar on a B-29B and I believe the 8 was an earlier version of that.

Heres a picture of a B-29B. You can see the Eagle Wing radar AN/APQ-7 between the bays and the 15 hanging off the tail.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg b_29_with_balls__photo_2_185.jpg (63.1 KB, 349 views)
__________________
Fighter pilots make movies....
Bomber pilots make history!
DaveB.inVa is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2005, 06:24 PM   #24
IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
 
FLYBOYJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 16,050
Yep - found the same info and the site on Frank Farrell - Great Stuff! On this site I found that shows radar equipment listings, it identifies the AN/APG-8 as a "radar gun sight," and the AN/APG-15 as a "tail gun turret radar." It would be nice to contact someone like Frank Farrel to confirm the absence/ installation of radar within the B-29 fire control system. I found many generalized references to it but no hard description.....
__________________
"IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT"
FLYBOYJ is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2005, 06:32 PM   #25
Senior Member
 
wmaxt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 1,175
Quote:
Originally Posted by FLYBOYJ
Got this from another site....

"All Gunners hy gyroscopic lead computing sights with stadiametric
ranging. As the Gunner tracked teh target, the gyroscopes measured
the rate of movement of the target in Azimuth and Elevation, The
Gunner would also track teh target in range, by using a "Motorcycle
throttle" type grip in the sight to size a ring of dots in the sight
picture to match the airplane's wingspan. Since the wingspan of an
attacking fighter would be known, or estimated slose enough, this
would give Range and Range Rate (Closing speed) information to hte
sight.

To add to this fine explanation, starting right around the beginning
of 1945, AN/APG-15 radars started making there way in B-29s. This was
a fairly small, cheap set that took much of the guesswork for figuring
range out of the gunners hands (although they could always go back to
the manual method, especially when the radars broke down)."
Just talking with my dad ( he started crew cheifing on B-29s) about the B-29s fire control system. The standard model had radar but it was primarily for weather, the gunsights were manual. The B-29MR (Modified Reciever) aircraft were Nuclear capable and only the tail gun turret remained to squeez a little more speed out of them. This was in '52-'54 +/- So its possible that they were removed because the jets were too fast requiring the gunner to fire by instinct or they were to hard to maintain. Or possibly they just didn't use them here in the states to avoid haviving the extra load of maintaining them constantly.

Another thing was he described the airial refuling (MR) method. they used a cable and hose system which involved catching a cable, drawing the hose down and hooking it up and then reversing the procedure. When it came free he said "it felt like the rear of the plane was going with it.

He's looking for his Tech manual-1 that has all the basic systems information on the B-29. If he's able to find it I will get the info out. He's still sharp and described the whole system down to and including the central gun control and locations, so I don't think he just forgot but its been 53 years.

That probably doesn't help much but it's all I got right now.

wmaxt
wmaxt is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2005, 06:32 PM   #26
Senior Member
 
DaveB.inVa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 224
Actually I just sent an email to the B-29 group.... I'm pretty sure we'll hear from Farrell... hes uh kinda wild...
__________________
Fighter pilots make movies....
Bomber pilots make history!
DaveB.inVa is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2005, 06:38 PM   #27
Senior Member
 
DaveB.inVa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 224
Thats very cool about your dad. He was very fortunate to get around the MR's. They were basically post war Silverplates that belonged to the 509th CG
__________________
Fighter pilots make movies....
Bomber pilots make history!
DaveB.inVa is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2005, 06:44 PM   #28
Senior Member
 
DaveB.inVa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 224
The very first reply back on the B-29 Yahoo group was from Farrell. He's blunt, but put it short and sweet, here is his reply unmodified and in its entirety. The cap's are his not mine so don't be offended... I've heard it a few times from him before myself.

"If he knows of a radar that waist / Blister gunners had , he knows more than WE do! Range finding was the cookie handle and sight glass reticle which in adjusting the size of the target within the changing diameter of the light reticle, adjusted th erange MODESTLY through a relatively unsophisticated computer! NO RADAR! Farrell"
__________________
Fighter pilots make movies....
Bomber pilots make history!
DaveB.inVa is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2005, 06:45 PM   #29
IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
 
FLYBOYJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 16,050
This will be great to find out - I'm guessing my uncle had his explanation confused with the radar operator - the last time I saw him he was on dialysis
__________________
"IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT"
FLYBOYJ is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2005, 06:48 PM   #30
IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
 
FLYBOYJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 16,050
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveB.inVa
The very first reply back on the B-29 Yahoo group was from Farrell. He's blunt, but put it short and sweet, here is his reply unmodified and in its entirety. The cap's are his not mine so don't be offended... I've heard it a few times from him before myself.

"If he knows of a radar that waist / Blister gunners had , he knows more than WE do! Range finding was the cookie handle and sight glass reticle which in adjusting the size of the target within the changing diameter of the light reticle, adjusted th erange MODESTLY through a relatively unsophisticated computer! NO RADAR! Farrell"
Well there you have it, I'll take that to the bank!

I'm assuming his explination included the front top station as well?
__________________
"IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT"
FLYBOYJ is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:32 PM.
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Ad Management plugin by RedTyger
Design by HTWoRKS


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118