![]() |
| |||||||
| Aviation Discussion on the aircraft of WWII. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #751 |
| Senior Member | I'm a bit late posting on this thread and may not be able to add much. It seems to be a contest between the Ju88, P38 and the Mosquito. I think the Mosquito has a very slight edge, It was manufactured in the UK, Canada and Australia and it did remain in service until the early 60s. It did star in several very notable raids like the attack on the Gestapo HQ and when disrupting a speech by Goering in Berlin and another even by Dr Goebbels... also over Berlin. It did use a lot of non strategic materials and utilised the skills of craftsmen that would otherwise have been underused. General "Hap" Arnold was enthisiasic about the aircraft although US manufacturers were sceptical. I beleve the USAAC did use some in the photo-reconassance role. Even Herman Goering was envious Quote: "In 1940 I could at least fly as far as Glasgow in most of my aircraft, but not now! It makes me furious when I see the Mosquito. I turn green and yellow with envy. The British, who can afford aluminium better than we can, knock together a beautiful wooden aircraft that every piano factory over there is building, and they give it a speed which they have now increased yet again. What do you make of that? There is nothing the British do not have. They have the geniuses and we have the nincompoops. After the war's over I'm going to buy a British radio set - then at least I'll own something that has always worked." (I'd dispute that last bit about the radio). Finally I think the Mosquito looks better.... The P38 and JU88 look meaner but the Mozzie is one of those aircraft that look as good as they are..... were.... whatever. I do like the P38 and by the way... although from the UK originally I'm not a die-hard "British is Best" faanatic... |
| | |
| | #752 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 394
| (im a noob at this so dont kill me) i think the ju88 could carry a heavier bombload than either the p38 or the mosquito, so that should for somthing. and i would like to point out that none of these planes could operate from a carrier
__________________ Four hostile newspapers are more to be feared than a thousand bayonets. --Napoleon Bonaparte-- |
| | |
| | #753 |
| Der Crewchief ![]() Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 33,150
| That is not true. The Royal Navy had the Sea Mosquito. Mk. 33 equiped with power-folding wings, oleo main gearm four-blade propellers, arrester hook, four 20mm cannon, torpedo (or various bomb/rocket loads), American ASH radar and rocket JATO boost. TF.37: Naval torpedo fighter, basically Mk. 33 with AI/ASV Mk. XIII radar.
__________________ ![]() fly boy:"isnt that the first jet bomber becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"[/I] |
| | |
| | #754 |
| Senior Member | Were they operational during WW2?
__________________ ![]() |
| | |
| | #755 |
| Der Crewchief ![]() Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 33,150
| I am not sure on that.
__________________ ![]() fly boy:"isnt that the first jet bomber becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"[/I] |
| | |
| | #756 |
| Older Than Dirt ![]() Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Posts: 7,309
| I am also late getting into this thread (and I'm not going through 51 pages) but.... has anyone mentioned the PBY ? Rescue, Observation/Spotting, Dive bomber, Torpedo bomber, Ambulance, Transport, Anti-sub, and a bit of straffing. Charles
__________________ ![]() I can only please one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow doesn't look good either.... |
| | |
| | #757 |
| Der Crewchief ![]() Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 33,150
| I agree the PBY was a great aircraft and did one hell of a job in the roles that it performed but the only reason I would not vote for the PBY is because there were sea planes in the same class as the PBY that could out perform, had better range and could perform the same tasks and sometimes more than the PBY. As I said though the BPY (for me and in my opinion) would get an honorable mention and was one hell of a plane.
__________________ ![]() fly boy:"isnt that the first jet bomber becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"[/I] |
| | |
| | #758 |
| Older Than Dirt ![]() Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Posts: 7,309
| I mearly mentioned the PBY..... the same could be said for the C-47/R4D. It was one hell of an airplane. Charles
__________________ ![]() I can only please one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow doesn't look good either.... |
| | |
| | #759 |
| Der Crewchief ![]() Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 33,150
| I mearly mentioned why I would not vote for it in my opinion....
__________________ ![]() fly boy:"isnt that the first jet bomber becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"[/I] |
| | |
| | #760 |
| Banned Join Date: May 2007 Location: Lisbon
Posts: 36
| in my opinion the ju 88 may be the best multiaction aircraft |
| | |
| | #761 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Texas
Posts: 1,429
| Since the thread is so long, I did not read everything. My only question is has anyone brought up the B-25? DBII Last edited by DBII; 10-31-2007 at 06:56 PM. Reason: TYPO |
| | |
| | #762 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: niagara falls
Posts: 5,585
| |
| | |
| | #763 |
| Banned Join Date: May 2007 Location: Lisbon
Posts: 36
| it is a nice airplane with a very hard fuselage but the junkers focus principally his amaising speed and fantastic versatiblility alied to his low production price and very good dive bombing made it a destructible wepon |
| | |
| | #764 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 394
| Quote:
__________________ Four hostile newspapers are more to be feared than a thousand bayonets. --Napoleon Bonaparte-- | |
| | |
| | #765 |
| Der Crewchief ![]() Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 33,150
| No the Ju 88 was a medium bomber. It was a medium bomber and could carry 5500 lb of bombs.
__________________ ![]() fly boy:"isnt that the first jet bomber becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"[/I] |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Italy v. England - Air to air | DAVIDICUS | Aviation | 193 | 07-22-2009 01:58 PM |
| French fighter aircrft | carpenoctem1689 | Aviation | 56 | 02-25-2009 11:41 AM |
| Carriers!! | MP-Willow | WW2 General | 275 | 01-28-2007 08:25 PM |
| RAF Bomber Command Diary... Jan 1945...... | lesofprimus | Aviation | 54 | 01-28-2007 02:29 PM |
| The Misadventures of Ivan Kozhedub's Famous "White 27&q | lesofprimus | Stories | 4 | 12-14-2004 01:14 PM |