Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums
 



Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > World War II - Aviation > Aviation

Aviation Discussion on the aircraft of WWII.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-01-2007, 10:23 AM   #766
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 220
Quote:
Originally Posted by DerAdlerIstGelandet View Post
No the Ju 88 was a medium bomber. It was a medium bomber and could carry 5500 lb of bombs.
The typical load for the B-17 and B-24 heavy bombers.

Any know what the range of the Ju88 was with 5500 lb of bomb?
AL Schlageter is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2007, 06:42 PM   #767
Senior Member
 
magnocain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 395
Quote:
No the Ju 88 was a medium bomber. It was a medium bomber and could carry 5500 lb of bombs.
I meant the largest bomb load out of the p38, ju88, and Mosquito. I believe that the ju88 could go (about) 1,200 miles, however i dont know if that range was with the full bombload, or any bombs at all.
__________________
Four hostile newspapers are more to be feared than a thousand bayonets.
--Napoleon Bonaparte--
magnocain is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2007, 08:36 AM   #768
Der Crewchief
 
DerAdlerIstGelandet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 34,086
Compared to a P-38 obviously the Ju 88 has a higher bomb load. The Mossie could carry up to 6000lb of bombs but that was over a very short range.

I do not know the range of the Ju 88 with max bomb load.
__________________


fly boy:"isnt that the first jet bomber becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"
DerAdlerIstGelandet is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2007, 10:29 PM   #769
Senior Member
 
magnocain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 395
which one was the cheapest, easiest to maintain, quickest to scramble, fastest dive rate,fastest climb, ect...? i know in some situations i would want a ju88, in some a p38, in some a mosiquito. what did their crews have to say?
__________________
Four hostile newspapers are more to be feared than a thousand bayonets.
--Napoleon Bonaparte--
magnocain is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2007, 04:04 PM   #770
Senior Member
 
Sgt. Pappy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 174
The Ju 88 made a better long-range bomber, but the Mosquito had unmatched maneuverability among the bombers, while being a good bit faster than the Ju88.

Add the Mossie's ability to carry a heavy battery of guns and you have a fighter-bomber/attack aircraft/anti-sub fighter/high speed transport/'energy' fighter. Not the best at fighting, but it will outfight a Ju88.
__________________
"Never in the field of human conflict was so much owed by so many to so few..." - Winston Churchill
Sgt. Pappy is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2007, 07:01 AM   #771
Senior Member
 
Civettone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Limburg
Posts: 1,299
Send a message via MSN to Civettone Send a message via Skype™ to Civettone
I don't see how the Ju 88 would make the better long-range bomber. First of all, it wasn't a long-range bomber. It had medium range. Second, the Mosquito had a similar range. Even later versions could fly 2,400 km with a full bomb load. And the Ju 88 could carry 1,000 lbs internally while the Mosquito could carry a cookie of 4,000 lbs in its belly!

I still stick to my original point. The Ju 88 could do lots of things and excelled at some of them. The Mosquito could do lots of things and excelled at most of them. In fact, the only place where it failed was as a day fighter.
Kris
__________________


Civettone is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2007, 10:54 PM   #772
Senior Member
 
magnocain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 395
Um... Ya actually i agree with that.
But i still like the ju88 better. So mabey...
1. mosquito
2. ju88
3. p38?
4. ?
__________________
Four hostile newspapers are more to be feared than a thousand bayonets.
--Napoleon Bonaparte--
magnocain is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2007, 03:27 AM   #773
Senior Member
 
The Jug Rules!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Hattiesburg,Ms
Posts: 194
im not so sure about this, but is this limited to ww2?


If not ill say the Ad skyraider. That Plane did just about everything you could name.
__________________
The Spits got nothing on this...

The Jug Rules! is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2007, 07:30 AM   #774
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 30
I believe they are focusing on WW2, but agree that the skyraider was the most versatile AC of all time. I read an account (I believe on this forum) written by skyraider pilot who was assigned to carry a nuke into USSR in the event of WW3 (in the mid-1950's I think). He gave simulated account of what the "final" mission would have been like - it was a cool read.

I know, I know: I am sure that the Mossie could have been modified to carry a nuke
Pflueger is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2008, 05:19 PM   #775
Senior Member
 
Seawitch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: London
Posts: 130
I just love the Douglas Skyraider, I've been reading a lot about them recently.
Drawn up in ww2 but never used in it, it came in 28 different variants from fighter/bomber to carrying passengers.
I think thats a record?
Specialisation was the reason it continued to exist, last seen operating in Chad in 1979.
__________________

Probably the world's best aircraft...

www.seawitchartist.com
Seawitch is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 06:14 AM   #776
Der Crewchief
 
DerAdlerIstGelandet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 34,086
This thread is about WW2 however...
__________________


fly boy:"isnt that the first jet bomber becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"
DerAdlerIstGelandet is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2008, 07:38 PM   #777
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lazio
Posts: 1,079
max internal bomb load of ju 88 is 1400 kg, is 500 kg only with a tank fuel in forward bay.
Vincenzo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2008, 12:20 PM   #778
Senior Member
 
Old Wizard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Lethbridge AB
Posts: 146
For added versatility both the B-25 and the Mosquito had a field artillery piece mounted in the nose. A 75mm for the B-25 and a 6 pounder for the Mosquito. I wonder what the opposition thought when one of these came at them?
Old Wizard is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2008, 01:04 AM   #779
Senior Member
 
kool kitty89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,412
Couldn't the Ju 88 carry even larger external loads like 2x SC 2000. (the largest I believe to be fitted)

If you look at the Ju 88's original prformance (with very few or no guns and w/out the dive bomber mods) it really could have been comparable to the Mossie as a fast bomber. (particularly by '39-'40 standards)

Quote:
The aircraft's first flight was made by the prototype Ju 88 V1, which bore the civil registration D-AQEN, on 21 December 1936. When it first flew, it managed about 580 km/h (360 mph) and Hermann Göring, head of the Luftwaffe was ecstatic. It was an aircraft that could finally fulfill the promise of the Schnellbomber, a high-speed bomber. The streamlined fuselage was modeled after its contemporary, the Dornier Do 17, but with fewer defensive guns because the belief still held that it could outrun late 1930s-era fighters. The fifth prototype set a 1,000 km (620 mile) closed-circuit record in March 1939, carrying a 2,000 kg (4,100 lb) payload at a speed of 517 km/h (320 mph).[3] However, by the time Luftwaffe planners had had their own "pet" features added (including dive-bombing), the Ju 88's top speed had dropped to around 450 km/h (280 mph).
IMO they should have kept a dedicated, stripped down, fast bomber variant with out guns/gunners. With crew down to 2, like in the Mossie.

Last edited by kool kitty89; 04-08-2008 at 01:36 AM.
kool kitty89 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2008, 01:29 AM   #780
Senior Member
 
kool kitty89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,412
As to an earlier question, I do believe the Mossie (late models) used counter rotating props. (as did the Hornet) Easily supported by the fact that such modles used 2 different engine models. (one 'left handed' and one 'right handed') I'm not sure if the rotated outward (as seen from the top of the prop discs) as in production P-38's or inward. (like the original XP-38 prototype)

Last edited by kool kitty89; 04-08-2008 at 01:33 AM.
kool kitty89 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Italy v. England - Air to air DAVIDICUS Aviation 193 07-22-2009 11:58 AM
French fighter aircrft carpenoctem1689 Aviation 56 02-25-2009 09:41 AM
Carriers!! MP-Willow WW2 General 275 01-28-2007 06:25 PM
RAF Bomber Command Diary... Jan 1945...... lesofprimus Aviation 54 01-28-2007 12:29 PM
The Misadventures of Ivan Kozhedub's Famous "White 27&q lesofprimus Stories 4 12-14-2004 11:14 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:58 AM.
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
Ad Management plugin by RedTyger
Design by HTWoRKS


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125