Best Allied Heavy Bomber - Aircraft of World War II

carman1877 · 11-01-2009, 01:17 AM

Which do you think is the best heavy bomber, and why? based on payload, defensive armament, etc.

FLYBOYJ · 11-01-2009, 04:13 AM

B-29 hands down. Bomb load, performance, defensive armament, internal systems, it was a half of generation ahead of any heavy bomber of WW2. Lancaster is a distant second.

paradoxguy · 11-01-2009, 04:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FLYBOYJ

B-29 hands down. Bomb load, performance, defensive armament, internal systems, it was a half of generation ahead of any heavy bomber of WW2. Lancaster is a distant second.

I agree, the B-29 is simply a class ahead of the other three. Of the remaining three, I believe the B-17 represents the best combination of performance, payload, durability/ability to sustain damage, and defensive armament.

FlyboyJ--What characteristics of the Avro Lancaster have you ranking it second ahead of the two American bombers? I'm not questioning your choice in any way, I'm asking only from curiosity and a desire to learn more.

DerAdlerIstGelandet · 11-01-2009, 09:27 AM

There is no competition here. The B-29 is the best heavy bomber the war period. Other bombers such as the B-17, B-24 and Lanc may have contributed more over the course of the war, but the B-29 was the most advanced bomber built during the war. It could carry the most payload over the farthest distance, best performance and the best defensive systems.

Can't argue it.

If I had to rank them all it would be like this:

1. B-29
2. Lancaster
3. B-17
4. B-24

Of course the only one that can not really be debated in my opinion is the B-29. Of course you are going to have people come in and say the Lancaster was better than the B-29. I ask them how? Was it a better design? No. Did it have better performance? No. Could it carry the kind of payloads the B-29 could? No. B-29 was hands down the best bomber designed during WW2.

davebender · 11-01-2009, 09:46 AM

However it entered service so late in the war that it's hardly fair to compare it to the B-17 which entered service 6 years earlier. Rather like comparing a F4F with a F8F.

Vincenzo · 11-01-2009, 10:03 AM

B-29 is w/o doubt the best heavy of war since june '44, but before? this is the question

davebender · 11-01-2009, 10:25 AM

The summer of 1942 is the mid point for the European war. Why don't we use that as our time frame for comparison? That eliminates the B-29 as well as late war variants of other aircraft.

parsifal · 11-01-2009, 10:30 AM

The B-29 started to enter service in late '43 as I recall.

There is no contest here. The B-29 is hands down the best allied bomber of the war

herman1rg · 11-01-2009, 10:32 AM

The Lancaster was the best due to it's adaptability with various bomb loads right up to the 22,000 LB Grand Slam and of course the "bouncing bomb" used on Operation Upkeep.
It served from 1941-1945 in WW2 and then through till 1963 after.

IMHO the B-29 while it may have been more advanced in some areas only came into service into service on 8th May 1944 until cessation of hostilities afterwards it only until 1960. I also believe that the B-29 had a max bomb load of 20,000lbs which is lower than the Lancaster.

My top 4
1. Avro Lancaster
2. B-17 Flying Fortress
3. B-24 Liberator
4. B-29 Superfortress

These are purely my own personal opinions.

Shortround6 · 11-01-2009, 10:57 AM

BY picking and chosing which month and year you can probably alter things enough to get one one plane to be the best at any particular time. at least among the 3 older planes.

This might be especially true of the Lancaster which had more variations in power plants than the B-17 and B-24.

Also as time went on the actual mission requirements changed. I am not sure if the Lancaster started out as a day bomber but it's use as a night bomber changed things compared to the American planes.

The increases in defensive armament on the American planes ment that while their "defensive rating" would go up their ability to carry a given weight of bombs over a certain distance goes down making them less effective bomb trucks.

FLYBOYJ · 11-01-2009, 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by paradoxguy

FlyboyJ--What characteristics of the Avro Lancaster have you ranking it second ahead of the two American bombers? I'm not questioning your choice in any way, I'm asking only from curiosity and a desire to learn more.

Its bomb carrying capability and range. The airframe had room to grow and take on all types of electronic equipment as well.

FLYBOYJ · 11-01-2009, 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by herman1rg

The Lancaster was the best due to it's adaptability with various bomb loads right up to the 22,000 LB Grand Slam and of course the "bouncing bomb" used on Operation Upkeep.
It served from 1941-1945 in WW2 and then through till 1963 after.

IMHO the B-29 while it may have been more advanced in some areas only came into service into service on 8th May 1944 until cessation of hostilities afterwards it only until 1960. I also believe that the B-29 had a max bomb load of 20,000lbs which is lower than the Lancaster..

Wrong on several counts. The B-29 actually saw combat service in April 44, entered regular service in 1943. The Lancaster entered combat service in 1942. The B-29 could also carry the grand slam as well as tall boys and was capable of a bomb load in excess of 20,000 pounds. The Lanc dropped the "bouncing bomb," the B-29 dropped the atominc bomb and continued to do so in the post war years. It served in Korea against MiGs and the last one was retired from the USAF in 1960. The B-29 was more advanced in MANY areas - defensive fire control system, better general configuration (it had tri-cycle landing gear as opposed to an out dated and more hazardous tail wheel) and the B-29 carried 2 pilots - better cockpit resource management as well as a built in safety factor. It could fly higher and faster than the Lanc and was pressurized.

BTW - the RAF used 70 B-29s because it didn't have a transcontinental nuclear strike capability during the post war years.

Again, the B-29 was at least a half a generation ahead of any WW2 heavy bomber.

DerAdlerIstGelandet · 11-01-2009, 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by herman1rg

The Lancaster was the best due to it's adaptability with various bomb loads right up to the 22,000 LB Grand Slam and of course the "bouncing bomb" used on Operation Upkeep.
It served from 1941-1945 in WW2 and then through till 1963 after.

IMHO the B-29 while it may have been more advanced in some areas only came into service into service on 8th May 1944 until cessation of hostilities afterwards it only until 1960. I also believe that the B-29 had a max bomb load of 20,000lbs which is lower than the Lancaster.

The B-29 could carry that 20,000lb the same distance that the Lancaster could carry less of a bomb load. It also could carry that bomb load without being modified.

The 20,000lb was just the standard load out for the B-29. What was the standard load out for the Lancaster? If I recall it was only 14,000 lb. In order for the Lancaster to carry that 22,000lb bomb it had to be modified. The B-29s range with max bomb load was farther than that of the Lancaster with a minimal bomb load.

The B-29 as a matter of fact was modified and used to test the 43,600lb T12 bomb. I believe a B-29 was even fitted with two Grand Slam bombs in testing.

The B-29 could do more than any other bomber.

Fact remains, the B-29 was the most advanced and capable of all the heavy bombers.

Milosh · 11-01-2009, 11:31 AM

The B-29 was classed as a very heavy bomber by the USAAF.

Timppa · 11-01-2009, 11:44 AM

In RAF service, even the successor of the Lancaster, the Avro Lincoln was replaced by.. the B-29.

The B-29 was a generation ahead of its competitors. AFAIK it is the only plane that was copied bolt by bolt (by the Russians). The popular story goes that even even the bullet holes were copied as "design features" (although Ii don't believe the Russians were that stupid).

View Poll Results: Which is the best Allied Heavy Bomber?
Avro lancaster	7	21.21%
B-24 Liberator	2	6.06%
B-17 Flying Fortress	3	9.09%
B-29 Superfortress	21	63.64%
Voters: 33. You may not vote on this poll

11-01-2009, 01:17 AM	#1
carman1877 Member Join Date: May 2009 Posts: 42	Best Allied Heavy Bomber Which do you think is the best heavy bomber, and why? based on payload, defensive armament, etc.

11-01-2009, 04:13 AM	#2
FLYBOYJ IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Colorado, USA Posts: 16,050	B-29 hands down. Bomb load, performance, defensive armament, internal systems, it was a half of generation ahead of any heavy bomber of WW2. Lancaster is a distant second. __________________ "IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT"

11-01-2009, 09:27 AM	#4
DerAdlerIstGelandet Der Crewchief Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ansbach, Germany Posts: 33,152	There is no competition here. The B-29 is the best heavy bomber the war period. Other bombers such as the B-17, B-24 and Lanc may have contributed more over the course of the war, but the B-29 was the most advanced bomber built during the war. It could carry the most payload over the farthest distance, best performance and the best defensive systems. Can't argue it. If I had to rank them all it would be like this: 1. B-29 2. Lancaster 3. B-17 4. B-24 Of course the only one that can not really be debated in my opinion is the B-29. Of course you are going to have people come in and say the Lancaster was better than the B-29. I ask them how? Was it a better design? No. Did it have better performance? No. Could it carry the kind of payloads the B-29 could? No. B-29 was hands down the best bomber designed during WW2. __________________ fly boy:"isnt that the first jet bomber becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"[/I]

11-01-2009, 09:46 AM	#5
davebender Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Michigan, USA Posts: 613	B-29 hands down However it entered service so late in the war that it's hardly fair to compare it to the B-17 which entered service 6 years earlier. Rather like comparing a F4F with a F8F.

11-01-2009, 10:03 AM	#6
Vincenzo Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Lazio Posts: 804	B-29 is w/o doubt the best heavy of war since june '44, but before? this is the question

11-01-2009, 10:25 AM	#7
davebender Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Michigan, USA Posts: 613	before? The summer of 1942 is the mid point for the European war. Why don't we use that as our time frame for comparison? That eliminates the B-29 as well as late war variants of other aircraft.

11-01-2009, 10:30 AM	#8
parsifal Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Posts: 1,994	The B-29 started to enter service in late '43 as I recall. There is no contest here. The B-29 is hands down the best allied bomber of the war __________________ Do not judge on abilities, but on choices

11-01-2009, 10:32 AM	#9
herman1rg Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Posts: 35	The Lancaster was the best due to it's adaptability with various bomb loads right up to the 22,000 LB Grand Slam and of course the "bouncing bomb" used on Operation Upkeep. It served from 1941-1945 in WW2 and then through till 1963 after. IMHO the B-29 while it may have been more advanced in some areas only came into service into service on 8th May 1944 until cessation of hostilities afterwards it only until 1960. I also believe that the B-29 had a max bomb load of 20,000lbs which is lower than the Lancaster. My top 4 1. Avro Lancaster 2. B-17 Flying Fortress 3. B-24 Liberator 4. B-29 Superfortress These are purely my own personal opinions.

11-01-2009, 10:57 AM	#10
Shortround6 Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Posts: 495	BY picking and chosing which month and year you can probably alter things enough to get one one plane to be the best at any particular time. at least among the 3 older planes. This might be especially true of the Lancaster which had more variations in power plants than the B-17 and B-24. Also as time went on the actual mission requirements changed. I am not sure if the Lancaster started out as a day bomber but it's use as a night bomber changed things compared to the American planes. The increases in defensive armament on the American planes ment that while their "defensive rating" would go up their ability to carry a given weight of bombs over a certain distance goes down making them less effective bomb trucks.

11-01-2009, 11:31 AM	#14
Milosh Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Posts: 101	The B-29 was classed as a very heavy bomber by the USAAF.

11-01-2009, 11:44 AM	#15
Timppa Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 94	In RAF service, even the successor of the Lancaster, the Avro Lincoln was replaced by.. the B-29. The B-29 was a generation ahead of its competitors. AFAIK it is the only plane that was copied bolt by bolt (by the Russians). The popular story goes that even even the bullet holes were copied as "design features" (although Ii don't believe the Russians were that stupid). Last edited by Timppa; 11-01-2009 at 12:55 PM.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode