Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums

Best Bomber Killing Aircraft......

Aviation Discuss Best Bomber Killing Aircraft...... in the World War II - Aviation forums; The Me 262 was certainly the best interceptor fielded. Even with the ongoing problems. (particularly the engines, which were much ...


Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > World War II - Aviation > Aviation

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 04-30-2008, 02:58 PM   #931
Senior Member
 
kool kitty89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,038
Country:
The Me 262 was certainly the best interceptor fielded. Even with the ongoing problems. (particularly the engines, which were much better by the war's end)

Though for a/c that saw more extensive service in the role, it's probably the Fw 190A-8. (maybe the A-9)

Last edited by kool kitty89 : 04-30-2008 at 03:04 PM.
kool kitty89 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2008, 12:27 AM   #932
Senior Member
 
Kruska's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 606
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erich View Post
curious why are you posing a what if with the Do 335 in this thread as well as nf ? the way of the jet was at hand, all prop jobs except the Ta 152H were to be replaced during summer of 45 for Tagdjagd. the 262 single seat had proven itself, other gruppen would have followed for nf duties, the Do 335 was not even considered seriously in the nf role. I'm doing a book co-authoring on the NF Reich defence duties, data collected for over 35 years so there will be much included as to why I consider my statements as truth
You are correct in that this thread the question is about which aircraft is the best bomber killer. Taking into account the superb performance of the 335 and the asumtion that it could be additionally armed with 2 gondolas and R4M's it well could have been the best in this role. Adding the chance that it could also have been used as a NF. I am not aware that the 335 had any major engine difficulties such as any German jet.

I do not believe that the German jets would have achieved a reliable performance at any time due to the existing material shortage of alloys. No matter if summer or winter 45.

In contra I would strongly believe that this advanced technology was only exploitable by the US as it proofed after the war due to its seemingly endless resources and $$. As for Germany it proofed to be a fatal choice and instead of developing and pressing a new generation of affordable and technically developed props such as the USA in the form of a P51/P47 or F4U the limited resources in regards to material/scientists was diverted into "mystic" wunderwaffen believes.

The only new props available in 44 that could have been pushed faster into service were the 152 or D11-14 or the 335 but due to to the above mentioned reasons they were neglegted in favour of "mystic" a/c and weapons.

That the 335 was not ment to serve as a NF in 45 is certainly correct, therfore I am meerly forwarding the idea that it could have served in its role as a bomber killer just as well during night and day.

As for two of my uncles (one is a real uncle) and two of their Fliegerkameraden (3 survived the war) all were piloting from 39-45, none of them supported the jets as an alternative to the overall prop solution. If one of them would have flown a 262 it would not have changed their mind in regards to a "future" alternative but a presently needed realistic support in means of advanced props in 44/45

None of them believed in 44 that the war could be won (especially not by Wunderwaffen) but they desperatly eyed and waited for support by advanced props in order to stop the Bombers and not a 262 or other jets that were to unreliable to ensure that support.

Offcourse I do admit that a "working" and "reliable" 262 must have been the solution to any desperate Luftwaffe Pilot in 45, but unfortunatly they were not working reliable. In contra a 109K, D-12 or D-9 or 335 was.

Regards
Kruska
Attachment 62234

Last edited by Kruska : 05-17-2008 at 05:05 PM.
Kruska is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2008, 10:36 AM   #933
Senior Member
 
fly boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 340
Country:
me 262
fly boy is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2008, 06:29 PM   #934
Senior Member
 
kool kitty89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,038
Country:
Another advantage of jet engines is onece you've got a design working it can be developed, expaded, and bulit upon at a rate inconcivable for piston engine designs. Hence why the US was able to catch up so fast even with the late start. The J31-to-J-33 and J30-to-J34 being the best examples of this.

However the original designs were still being worked out, had it not been due to some of the mechanical (turbine vibration) problems when switching from the 004A (1941) to the initial 004B design it would have gone alot smoother it wasn't till the 004D nearing production in early 1945 (produced before war's end,) that the vibration (and thus the 8700 rpm linit) was resolved. The 003 was still a bit from working in the same period as the 004 in '41 as it had both some compressor, turbine, and combustor problems to work out (basicle the whole design deeded work, hence the low power output of the early test engines), however it turned out to be easier to build than the 004B in addition to bing more compact, relaible, and better performing. And I'm not even going into the HeS-30 (006) design... And in hindsight the HeS-011 should never have been developed.

Last edited by kool kitty89 : 05-01-2008 at 06:38 PM.
kool kitty89 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2008, 08:00 AM   #935
Junior Member
 
Vraciu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: A Galaxy Far, Far Away
Posts: 20
Country:
Over Europe - Me 262 with it's four MK 108 30 mm cannons;
Over Pacific - 1941/1942 A6M2 Zeke, 1943-1945 F6F and N1K2-J
__________________
Krzychu "Vraciu" Lam
Vraciu is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2008, 03:43 PM   #936
Senior Member
 
B-17engineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Tewksbury, New Jersey
Posts: 1,100
Country:
I really don't know but I would say Me-210/410, Me-110, or Me-262
__________________
B-17engineer is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2008, 12:58 PM   #937
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 17
Country:
Over the Pacific it would have to be the J2M Raiden. The only Japanese plane good in combat with the B29.

Over Europe the Me262 with its 4x30mm cannon and the R4M rockets was pretty tough as the rockets had the same trajectory as the cannon, so easy to aim.

Allied wise the Black widow or mosquito FB would cause alot of damage if you got in front of it.
moomoo2 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2008, 12:15 PM   #938
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: broomfield, colo.
Posts: 46
Country:
The hienklel he 219 uhu was definitly a force to contend with at night. But during the day the me 410 hornes was bloody efective given that there were no escorts. With escorts the best interceptore would have to be the me 262. Keep in mind that with closing speeds of up to 700+ miles per hour the jet pilots coudent aim well or get many shots on target, its strengh was its speed could out run fighters. Luckly for the germans 4 30mm cannons don't need much hits on target to bring down a bomber.
BIG BIRD is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
   

AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com Avitop.com


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91