Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums
 



Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > World War II - Aviation > Aviation

Aviation Discussion on the aircraft of WWII.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-21-2009, 06:45 PM   #1006
Senior Member
 
michaelmaltby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 224
" ... On the other side, many P-39s were rearmed with 20mm guns... though that may have been only during the early stages..."

Not really, Civettone. The one's with 20's were P-400's that the British had ordered and found not to their wanting and passed on to the Soviets - who no doubt may have swapped the Hispanos with a 20 of their own. But mostly what the Russians did was REMOVE wing guns. Concentrating on the 37 and the 2 50's.

MM
michaelmaltby is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2009, 11:02 PM   #1007
Senior Member
 
Clay_Allison's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 923
If the P-38 had been fitted with a pair of M4 37mm cannon it would have been the perfect bomber interceptor IMO.
__________________
It's always easy to find reasons why something shouldn't be done, the trick is to find ways to get it done. -- claidemore
Clay_Allison is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2009, 01:24 AM   #1008
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Oshawa ON
Posts: 28
The P-39 was called the Flying Dog for good reason by those that got stuck flying it. While it may have been decently armed, it was a pig to fly.
The best bomber attack aircraft of the war was the FW-190. Sturdy enough that if you ran out of gun and cannon rounds, you could ram the bomber as a last resort and have some chance of surviving.
carbonlifeform is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2009, 01:41 AM   #1009
Senior Member
 
Clay_Allison's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 923
The P-38 really had a lot of potential, if we had needed a bomber killer for big bombers, the Lightning could have had some really impressive armament nose-mounted.
__________________
It's always easy to find reasons why something shouldn't be done, the trick is to find ways to get it done. -- claidemore
Clay_Allison is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2009, 09:38 AM   #1010
Senior Member
 
michaelmaltby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 224
"..The P-39 was called the Flying Dog for good reason by those that got stuck flying it. While it may have been decently armed, it was a pig to fly."

The Russians didn't think so, Carbon, and neither did Chuck Yeager.

Providing top cover for Sturmaviks, flying from fields 20 miles behind the front, the Airacobra was a HOT plane with a deadly gun at 100 meters.

MM
michaelmaltby is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2009, 12:18 PM   #1011
the old Sage
 
Erich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Platonic Sphere
Posts: 10,770
the P-39 used by the Soviets was used for close ground support, a few yes and I mean a few pilots were good enough to tangle with the Lw in the air. as to being armed with heavier caliber cannon the point is useless when closing in to ensure a kill that you don;t get entrapped with debris off your victim plus having the heavier up to two 37mm's ? point is the uselessness in maneuvering in a dogfight with your foes escorts.

the SturmFw was the supreme Viermotötter but proved it's probs with P-51's after the carry through a US bomber formation
__________________
Rip it up !
Erich is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2009, 02:04 PM   #1012
Senior Member
 
Civettone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Limburg
Posts: 1,219
Send a message via MSN to Civettone Send a message via Skype™ to Civettone
Quote:
Originally Posted by michaelmaltby View Post
" ... On the other side, many P-39s were rearmed with 20mm guns... though that may have been only during the early stages..."

Not really, Civettone. The one's with 20's were P-400's that the British had ordered and found not to their wanting and passed on to the Soviets - who no doubt may have swapped the Hispanos with a 20 of their own. But mostly what the Russians did was REMOVE wing guns. Concentrating on the 37 and the 2 50's.

MM
You're right Michael. I reread the story from Joe Baugher and it did relate to the P-400 as well as post-war.

As to Erich's claim. I'll just copy paste the following:

It is in Soviet service that the Airacobra was used to its best effect. Soviet Air Force military doctrine was that its primary mission was to support the ground operations of the Soviet Army, and the P-39 was a natural for this role since it had an excellent low altitude performance and was heavily armed. Contrary to many published reports, the Soviet Airacobra was not primarily used as a ground-attack aircraft and tank buster, although it is certainly true that it often strafed targets of opportunity. It was actually primarily used as a low-altitude escort fighter for ground attack aircraft such as the Il-2 and later the Il-10.

The Airacobra was quite popular with its Russian pilots, who appreciated its heavy armament, its excellent low-altitude performance, and its ability to absorb an incredible amount of battle damage. When operating at low altitudes, the Airacobra was often able to hold its own against top-of-the-line German fighters. Some Soviet pilots felt that the P-39 outclassed even the Messerschmitt Bf 109 and Focke Wulf FW 190 at altitudes below 10,000 feet. Some of the users of the type were Guard (ie. elite) Fighter Regiments 16 GIAP, 19 GIAP, 21 GIAP, 72 GIAP, 100 GIAP, 213 GIAP (previously 508 IAP) and Fighter Regiments 196 IAP, 255 IAP, 508 IAP (later 213 GIAP).

Several Soviet Airacobra aces are known. Lieutenant Colonel of the Guards Alexander I. Pokryshin, a Soviet ace with 59 kills to his credit, scored 48 of these in a P-39. He was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross by President Roosevelt. There are eight other P-39 pilots with at least 20 kills. Among top Airacobra aces were Grigorii A Rechkalov (44 kills) , Nikolai D Gulayev (36 kills), Ivan I Babak, Aleksandr F Klubov, Andrei I Trud, and the brothers Boris B Glinka and Dmitrii B Glinka


Airacobras in the Soviet Union

Kris
__________________


Civettone is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2009, 02:43 PM   #1013
Senior Member
 
michaelmaltby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 224
Thanks, Kris. I get very tired at the endless slagging of the P-39. There were lots of Soviet Airacobra aces and it was probably as forgiving to fly in combat as any Soviet fighter. It wasn't the fighter that the British or Americans needed - even with high altitude performance it would have had very short legs - but it was what the Russians needed in the unique conditions on the Eastern Front. Deserves more respect IMHO

MM

Last edited by michaelmaltby; 07-22-2009 at 04:52 PM. Reason: spelling
michaelmaltby is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2009, 02:54 PM   #1014
the old Sage
 
Erich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Platonic Sphere
Posts: 10,770
I did not post a claim but the truth gents, you even say so Civ in your posting. the P-39 was not a bomber killer extrod
__________________
Rip it up !
Erich is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2009, 02:56 AM   #1015
Senior Member
 
Clay_Allison's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 923
I think the Mosquito would have been an amazing bomber killer if called upon to do the job.
__________________
It's always easy to find reasons why something shouldn't be done, the trick is to find ways to get it done. -- claidemore
Clay_Allison is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2009, 07:50 PM   #1016
Senior Member
 
drgondog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: oregon
Posts: 3,933
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clay_Allison View Post
I think the Mosquito would have been an amazing bomber killer if called upon to do the job.
It would have been as effective or better than the Me 410 but should have a lot of problems against good escort fighters..
drgondog is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2009, 07:57 PM   #1017
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 914
But the Germans didn't have any
__________________
BlondeValkyrie - Bugger off and host your OWN pictures you thieving twat
Waynos is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2009, 08:32 PM   #1018
Senior Member
 
Civettone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Limburg
Posts: 1,219
Send a message via MSN to Civettone Send a message via Skype™ to Civettone
Erich, I was more referring to what you said about the P-39 being used by the Soviets for close ground support which was not true. Mainly as a fighter and used for ground attacks when needed... just like any other Russian fighter.


Kris
__________________


Civettone is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2009, 07:04 AM   #1019
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 22
if we're talking about kill / death ratio, surely a german night fighter has to take gold.

problem is, history is whats been reported by those considerably removed from the concept of free or accurate speech due to agendas, so I'm thinking there are those little diamonds of truth forever buried under the avalanche of Victors Propaganda.

its anyones guess. You might as well ask for the most effective fighter, pound for pound all things considered.

youll just get a question answered by a million more.
20317 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2009, 07:56 AM   #1020
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,759
Quote:
Originally Posted by 20317 View Post
...there are those little diamonds of truth forever buried under the avalanche of Victors Propaganda...
nice...
Colin1 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:54 AM.
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Ad Management plugin by RedTyger
Design by HTWoRKS


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118