Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums
 



Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > World War II - Aviation > Aviation

Aviation Discussion on the aircraft of WWII.

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-16-2005, 07:20 AM   #241
Der Crewchief
 
DerAdlerIstGelandet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 34,081
Quote:
Originally Posted by the lancaster kicks ass
nothing is, yet you seem to think the P-38 is??
Actually I dont think the P-38 was the greatest plane ever. I just think it is better then some of the things you throw up against it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RG_Lunatic
That is not true Alder. I just think the P-51 was competative with all its rivals in WWII. It had a few things it did very well, such as sustain high speeds for extended periods and tremendous range, and others it was not so good at, such as sustained hard turns and durability under fire.
Thankyou RG, that is the best thing Ive heard so far. Now I will agree with you!
__________________


fly boy:"isnt that the first jet bomber becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"
DerAdlerIstGelandet is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 04-16-2005, 08:11 AM   #242
IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
 
FLYBOYJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 16,877
Quote:
Originally Posted by RG_Lunatic
Quote:
Originally Posted by DerAdlerIstGelandet
Oh I believe exactly what you are saying, but RG thinks that the P-51 is the greatest thing since bread and butter. Yes it was a great aircraft and one of the best ever built however it like all aircraft had faults also. Machines are not perfect.
That is not true Alder. I just think the P-51 was competative with all its rivals in WWII. It had a few things it did very well, such as sustain high speeds for extended periods and tremendous range, and others it was not so good at, such as sustained hard turns and durability under fire.

The P-38 was a great plane, but it's not until you get into the late J series that it really came into its own. And it was flawed in its ability at high speeds because the wings were not properly designed for it - it should have had a little more wing area but thinner wings.

All-in-all, I think the F4U-4 and P-47M/N were the best American fighters.

The F4U-4 was probably the best pure fighter of the three perticularly under about 27,000 feet. But of course, it didn't see action in the ETO.

=S=

Lunatic

I VOTE FOR THE F4U-4
__________________
> I Support Doug Gillis <
FLYBOYJ is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 04-16-2005, 10:15 AM   #243
Senior Member
 
trackend's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canvey Island, Essex
Posts: 4,030
Spite,Spite,Spite,Spite,Spite,Spite...... I must stop spitting, filthy habit.
But seriously folks I love the Spitfire but my logical head says that the Corsair (even though not correct I like names more than numbers) was a more advanced aircraft so I believe probably on balance a better fighter. Clever bloke that Sikorsky (& Beisel of course)
trackend is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 04-17-2005, 10:31 AM   #244
Der Crewchief
 
DerAdlerIstGelandet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 34,081
The Corsair was definatly a great aircraft.
__________________


fly boy:"isnt that the first jet bomber becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"
DerAdlerIstGelandet is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 04-17-2005, 02:14 PM   #245
Senior Member
 
the lancaster kicks ass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,945
Send a message via MSN to the lancaster kicks ass
and cirtainly in the running for this title............
__________________

"Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy."
the lancaster kicks ass is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 04-18-2005, 01:02 PM   #246
Der Crewchief
 
DerAdlerIstGelandet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 34,081
Yes it should be.
__________________


fly boy:"isnt that the first jet bomber becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"
DerAdlerIstGelandet is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 04-18-2005, 04:58 PM   #247
Senior Member
 
Aggie08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,013
Send a message via AIM to Aggie08
my vote is with the mustang or the corsair... but no takers for the me-262? Could have changed the course of the war had it been utilized properly...
__________________
"I had ten rockets on board, and as I wasn't particularly fond of head-on attacks, I salvoed the whole lot at him. The rockets didn't hit him but but they must have scared the bejesus out of him, for he did a steep turn to starboard... I let him have the full blast, all eight fifty-calibers. I had never seen an aircraft completely disintegrate in the air the way this Me-110 did..."
Bill Dunn, 406th Fighter Group



Matt
Aggie08 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 04-19-2005, 07:54 AM   #248
Der Crewchief
 
DerAdlerIstGelandet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 34,081
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aggie08
my vote is with the mustang or the corsair... but no takers for the me-262? Could have changed the course of the war had it been utilized properly...
The Corsair is a fine choice. I would not go with the 262 however. I too think it was a fine aircraft (not accounting for the engine problems), and I too think it was the best operational jet of WW2 however it was too little, too late. Needed to work out the engine problems and get more fuel and then maybe if it had been operational about a year sooner.
__________________


fly boy:"isnt that the first jet bomber becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"
DerAdlerIstGelandet is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 04-19-2005, 12:04 PM   #249
Senior Member
 
the lancaster kicks ass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,945
Send a message via MSN to the lancaster kicks ass
she wasn't much of a dogfighter either..........
__________________

"Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy."
the lancaster kicks ass is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 04-20-2005, 06:47 AM   #250
Senior Member
 
trackend's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canvey Island, Essex
Posts: 4,030
I read that the speed of the 262 actually caused problems as the range closed so quickly they had to reduce speed to get long enough to ensure accuacy on smaller targets like fighters ect also the aircraft had a habit of weaving when given some welly
trackend is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 04-20-2005, 07:23 AM   #251
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 795
Quote:
Originally Posted by trackend
I read that the speed of the 262 actually caused problems as the range closed so quickly they had to reduce speed to get long enough to ensure accuacy on smaller targets like fighters ect also the aircraft had a habit of weaving when given some welly
The a/c tended to 'snake' at high speeds.

Throttling back was not an option for under 6000rpm the throttle could not be moved quickly. On a bomber attack, the a/c would dive from a higher altitude(1500m??) to get through the fighter screen, go below the level of the bombers(500m??) and climb to loose speed. Seen a diagram in a book someplace, hence the '??'.
KraziKanuK is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 04-20-2005, 08:41 AM   #252
Senior Member
 
trackend's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canvey Island, Essex
Posts: 4,030
Thanks for the info KK
trackend is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 04-20-2005, 01:04 PM   #253
Der Crewchief
 
DerAdlerIstGelandet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 34,081
The aircraft was deffinatly too fast for conventional dogfighting. Therefore she was better suited for intercepting then dogfighting.
__________________


fly boy:"isnt that the first jet bomber becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"
DerAdlerIstGelandet is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 04-20-2005, 02:44 PM   #254
Senior Member
 
the lancaster kicks ass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,945
Send a message via MSN to the lancaster kicks ass
which is the role she was used in most...........
__________________

"Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy."
the lancaster kicks ass is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 04-21-2005, 01:52 PM   #255
Der Crewchief
 
DerAdlerIstGelandet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 34,081
Correct
__________________


fly boy:"isnt that the first jet bomber becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"
DerAdlerIstGelandet is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:36 AM.
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
Ad Management plugin by RedTyger
Design by HTWoRKS


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125