 | The Best Fw-190 Variant...?| Aviation Discuss The Best Fw-190 Variant...? in the World War II - Aviation forums; Originally Posted by RG_Lunatic
These figures basically agree with what I'm saying, only about 300 or so Me262's ... |
|
04-16-2005, 08:32 AM
|
#196 | | Der Crewchief
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 30,173
Country: | Quote: |
Originally Posted by RG_Lunatic These figures basically agree with what I'm saying, only about 300 or so Me262's saw action in WWII. | And no one here was contesting that. We were contesting that more then 300 were built. Nobody ever said that more then 300 saw service. Quote: |
Originally Posted by RG_Lunatic You mean they sent all the thousands of pilots in the area of on Furlow right at the time they were expecting an invasion? Do you really believe that? | Whoever said that there were thousands of pilots in the area?
__________________ US Army Blackhawk Crewchief 2000-2006 Classic ww2aircraft.net quotes: fly boy said: "isn't that the first jet bomber? becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles" "wait what ok who made the b-2 crash come on people that messed up its a b-2" "ah yes the mistel those things are so annoying is games and in real life" |
| |
04-16-2005, 11:13 AM
|
#197 | | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by DerAdlerIstGelandet Quote: |
Originally Posted by RG_Lunatic These figures basically agree with what I'm saying, only about 300 or so Me262's saw action in WWII. | And no one here was contesting that. We were contesting that more then 300 were built. Nobody ever said that more then 300 saw service. | And I never disputed that around 1450 were officially produced. I just don't think that a plane can really be counted as "produced" unless it is flyable. As I said before, about 2400 airframes were laid down, about 1450 were produced, about 800 were delivered (many with non-working engines), only about 300 saw combat service plus a number of prototypes flew as test planes (perhaps 50?). Quote: |
Originally Posted by DerAdlerIstGelandet Quote: |
Originally Posted by RG_Lunatic You mean they sent all the thousands of pilots in the area of on Furlow right at the time they were expecting an invasion? Do you really believe that? | Whoever said that there were thousands of pilots in the area? | [/quote]
Well, if you look at German fighter production from Nov. 1943 to Apr. 1944, there should have been well over 10,000 new fighter planes available. If the Luftwaffe' was not suffering heavy losses of planes and pilots during this period - where were they on D-Day? | |
| |
04-16-2005, 12:38 PM
|
#198 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,954
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by RG_Lunatic
Well, if you look at German fighter production from Nov. 1943 to Apr. 1944, there should have been well over 10,000 new fighter planes available. If the Luftwaffe' was not suffering heavy losses of planes and pilots during this period - where were they on D-Day? | Many were stuck on the ground because of fuel shortage, and even more pilots were on furlow.
You'll be surprised how much the LW was restricted by fuel shortage during the 44-45 period !
__________________ We have built a total of about 1250 of this aircraft (Me-262), but only fifty were allowed to be used as fighters - as interceptors. And out of this fifty, there were never more than 25 operational. So we had only a very, very few.
- Adolf Galland |
| |
04-16-2005, 12:45 PM
|
#199 | | | Fuel shortages would not have really started for aircraft bases until mid-summer or so. The strategic fuel resources were not specifically targeted in a big way until after D-Day. Tactical fuel resources were targeted, but again, why wasn't the Luftwaffe' defending those? | |
| |
04-16-2005, 01:25 PM
|
#200 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,954
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by RG_Lunatic Fuel shortages would not have really started for aircraft bases until mid-summer or so. The strategic fuel resources were not specifically targeted in a big way until after D-Day. Tactical fuel resources were targeted, but again, why wasn't the Luftwaffe' defending those? | RG the German army was in fuel shortage already in 43 ! Why else do you think it was so important for the German army to get those oil resources in the Caucasus ?
__________________ We have built a total of about 1250 of this aircraft (Me-262), but only fifty were allowed to be used as fighters - as interceptors. And out of this fifty, there were never more than 25 operational. So we had only a very, very few.
- Adolf Galland |
| |
04-17-2005, 04:16 AM
|
#201 | | | Oil was in short supply in terms of supporting major ground offensives, but there was pleanty for conducting defensive air operations. The Luftwaffe' didn't suffer from such shortages until the Fall of 1944. | |
| |
04-17-2005, 12:07 PM
|
#202 | | Der Crewchief
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 30,173
Country: | Quote: |
Originally Posted by RG_Lunatic Well, if you look at German fighter production from Nov. 1943 to Apr. 1944, there should have been well over 10,000 new fighter planes available. If the Luftwaffe' was not suffering heavy losses of planes and pilots during this period - where were they on D-Day? | Please tell me you dont actually believe that those 10000 were all in Normandy?  Lets see there was the Eastern Front, the Med, and the air defence of Germany.
__________________ US Army Blackhawk Crewchief 2000-2006 Classic ww2aircraft.net quotes: fly boy said: "isn't that the first jet bomber? becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles" "wait what ok who made the b-2 crash come on people that messed up its a b-2" "ah yes the mistel those things are so annoying is games and in real life" |
| |
04-17-2005, 12:34 PM
|
#203 | | | Of course not. But really, they were no where to be found on the W. front. The defense of Germany in late summer 1944 consisted of something like 700 fighters. Of those 10,000, you'd expect at least a few thousand to have been allocated to the W. front. Had the Germans been able to put up 3000 fighters to intercept the US bomber formations, they'd have wiped out those formations.
The only logical explanation here is that the Luftwaffe' did not have the planes or pilots available to mount such interceptions, or to operate against the allies in Normandy during D-day. The only logical explanation for that would be losses.
=S=
Lunatic | |
| |
04-17-2005, 12:39 PM
|
#204 | | Der Crewchief
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 30,173
Country: | There were two complete Jagd Geschwader in the vicinity of Normandy on D-Day and most of the pilots were on leave back in Germany. A 3rd JG (I believe it was JG II/3 was on its way to Normandy on June 6, 1944 but did not arrive on time and when it did arrive there airfield had been destroyed and they could not land there.
__________________ US Army Blackhawk Crewchief 2000-2006 Classic ww2aircraft.net quotes: fly boy said: "isn't that the first jet bomber? becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles" "wait what ok who made the b-2 crash come on people that messed up its a b-2" "ah yes the mistel those things are so annoying is games and in real life" |
| |
04-17-2005, 12:51 PM
|
#205 | | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by DerAdlerIstGelandet There were two complete Jagd Geschwader in the vicinity of Normandy on D-Day and most of the pilots were on leave back in Germany. A 3rd JG (I believe it was JG II/3 was on its way to Normandy on June 6, 1944 but did not arrive on time and when it did arrive there airfield had been destroyed and they could not land there. | And how many planes is in a JG? | |
| |
04-17-2005, 01:06 PM
|
#206 | | Banned
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 795
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by RG_Lunatic
And how many planes is in a JG? | JG = 3 or 4 Gruppen (wing)
1 Gruppen = 3 or 4 staffel (squadron)
1 staffel = 12 a/c
each stab = 4 a/c (JG stab and each Gruppen stab) |
| |
04-17-2005, 02:16 PM
|
#207 | | | Okay, I have some figures: West
Jan-May 1944 - day fighters: strength = 1491, losses = 5694
Jun-Oct 1944 - day fighters: strength = 1135, losses = 6412
Those are pretty nasty loss rates!
=S=
Lunatic | |
| |
04-17-2005, 03:42 PM
|
#208 | | Minister of Whoopass
Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Long Island Native in Mississippi
Posts: 13,270
Country: | Are those combat losses or operational losses???????
__________________ "After That Second Kill, I Knew It Was Time To Get The Hell Outta There..."
-- Lt. William Northrop Case
To See My IL2 Sturmovik Video Tribute to My Grandfather, Click Here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HtzN5RuNNJk |
| |
04-17-2005, 03:44 PM
|
#209 | | Master of Ewes
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,959
Country: | oh my god you're back!!
where you been les?? you here to stay?? and more to the point did you miss me??
__________________ 
"Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy." |
| |
04-17-2005, 03:53 PM
|
#210 | | Banned
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 795
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by RG_Lunatic Okay, I have some figures: West
Jan-May 1944 - day fighters: strength = 1491, losses = 5694
Jun-Oct 1944 - day fighters: strength = 1135, losses = 6412
Those are pretty nasty loss rates!
=S=
Lunatic | And American losses for 1944 was 15,675 a/c vs Germany. |
| | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:09 PM. |  | |