 | Which was the best night fighter?| Aviation Discuss Which was the best night fighter? in the World War II - Aviation forums; Well, the LW started doing these intruder missions back in 1941, using Ju88's. Unfortunately Hitler didn't like it ... |
|
07-01-2007, 12:46 PM
|
#136 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Dordrecht
Posts: 2,089
Country: | Well, the LW started doing these intruder missions back in 1941, using Ju88's. Unfortunately Hitler didn't like it and told the Nightfighter command to stop this. IMHO one of the greatest blunders of the war!
As far as I know, in Germany the nightfighters were controlled by a system called "Himmelbett". Although this was a nice system, it had some serious backdraws in that it could only controle one plane in one sector and this plane could also not been taken over by other sectors. So long range didn't do much good. I still think Mossies wouldn't have made a difference.
__________________ 
"I'm no hero. Soldiers on the ground, they are heroes. In an aircraft you can always evade the bullets."
-Jan Linzel, Dutch fighter pilot |
| |
07-02-2007, 11:08 AM
|
#137 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 7
Country: | Did night fighter pilots rate speed and altitude as especially desirable in a night fighting aircraft ? Before he died I was fortunate to be able to work as unpaid secretary to Wing Commander John "Catseyes" Cunningham and he always rated other factors as being more more important. Chiefly amongst these I would rate good radar installation, effective weaponry, maneouvreability and crew comfort. A bloody good navigator/radar operator ( and he had one in Flt.Lt. Rawnsley ) also is of critical importance. Sure height and altitude cannot be ignored but, other than early in the war, most aircraft used as nightfighters had both of these factors in sufficiency. |
| |
07-02-2007, 11:13 AM
|
#138 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 8,067
| When you think about it, unless the nughtfighter can find its target at a long enough range to be able to maneuver for a shot, everything else becomes secondary.
The radar system and a good radar operator is the most important.
__________________ "Pilot to copilot..... what are those mountain goats doing up here in the clouds?" |
| |
07-02-2007, 12:41 PM
|
#139 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Dordrecht
Posts: 2,089
Country: | Quote:
Originally Posted by syscom3 When you think about it, unless the nughtfighter can find its target at a long enough range to be able to maneuver for a shot, everything else becomes secondary.
The radar system and a good radar operator is the most important. | Exactly, so that's why I think either mossie, Bf110, Blackwidow or Ju88, doesn't matter as long as the radar and the ground system is good.
__________________ 
"I'm no hero. Soldiers on the ground, they are heroes. In an aircraft you can always evade the bullets."
-Jan Linzel, Dutch fighter pilot |
| |
07-02-2007, 12:45 PM
|
#140 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: NIAGARA
Posts: 4,289
Country: | Speed would be important since all attacks at night would be from astern so yo have to have spped to overtake
__________________ |
| |
07-02-2007, 01:12 PM
|
#141 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: London
Posts: 2,794
| Quote:
Originally Posted by pbfoot Speed would be important since all attacks at night would be from astern so yo have to have spped to overtake | I agree with this. Its important to have sufficient speed or you will not catch the target, extreame speed would I have thought been more of a problem than a help.
In the books I have read on nightfighting overshooting the target has often been a problem. |
| |
07-02-2007, 01:15 PM
|
#142 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Dordrecht
Posts: 2,089
Country: | Quote:
Originally Posted by pbfoot Speed would be important since all attacks at night would be from astern so yo have to have spped to overtake | Okay, good point
__________________ 
"I'm no hero. Soldiers on the ground, they are heroes. In an aircraft you can always evade the bullets."
-Jan Linzel, Dutch fighter pilot |
| |
07-09-2007, 06:47 PM
|
#143 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,552
| The Ju-88 is the best night-fighter IMO.
__________________ We have built a total of about 1250 of this aircraft (Me-262), but only fifty were allowed to be used as fighters - as interceptors. And out of this fifty, there were never more than 25 operational. So we had only a very, very few.
- Adolf Galland |
| |
07-10-2007, 12:59 PM
|
#144 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Dordrecht
Posts: 2,089
Country: | Quote:
Originally Posted by Soren The Ju-88 is the best night-fighter IMO. | Good choice but any explanation?
__________________ 
"I'm no hero. Soldiers on the ground, they are heroes. In an aircraft you can always evade the bullets."
-Jan Linzel, Dutch fighter pilot |
| |
07-10-2007, 02:35 PM
|
#145 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: London
Posts: 2,794
| The Mossie is the best in MHO |
| |
07-12-2007, 11:32 PM
|
#146 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,552
| The Ju-88 is the best IMO because of its high speed, excellent maneuverability & responsiveness for its size, high ceiling and excellent armament & detection equipment. Its either the Ju-88 or the Mossie, they're VERY close - the Ju-388J is better than both though, but it didn't go fully operational.
__________________ We have built a total of about 1250 of this aircraft (Me-262), but only fifty were allowed to be used as fighters - as interceptors. And out of this fifty, there were never more than 25 operational. So we had only a very, very few.
- Adolf Galland |
| |
07-12-2007, 11:44 PM
|
#147 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 8,067
| Since the Lancs were flying below 20,000 ft, any comparisons between the Mosquito and JU88 should be done below this altitude.
It doesnt matter what the high altitude performance was for either if there wasn't allied bombers flying up there.
__________________ "Pilot to copilot..... what are those mountain goats doing up here in the clouds?" |
| |
09-03-2007, 12:08 PM
|
#148 | | Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 74
Country: | Sep 13th, 8pm Eastern, History Channel's "Dogfights" will feature a show on night fighters.
I, hopefully, will have a small bit in there about the Beau. Taped it back in July, have not seen any of it, so A) don't know how good/realistic the show will be or B) if I made it past the editing room floor. |
| |
09-03-2007, 02:58 PM
|
#149 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 831
Country: | Hi Brickhistory,
>During my US Beau research, I came across many listings in the squadron's histories for UFOs, dubbed 'foo fighters.' Other Allied aircrew also saw weird/goofy things over Europe and most were thrown in the foo fighter category.
>Does anyone know of German reports of the topic? A search here didn't get any hits.
I never read anything about Foo Fighters from the German side at all. My working hypothesis is that the Allied crews were confused by the flare rounds apparently fired by the Flak units of Luftwaffe nightfighter bases at regular intervals and in regular patterns to help their pilots locate the bases.
In difficult lighting situations and with no reference for distance or size, the regular patterns flare rounds probably could look very strange to the Allied pilots who did not know what they were for.
Just think back how many of these Foo Fighter reports go something like: "We were patrolling in the vicinity of the Luftwaffe night fighter base at ..., when suddenly a string of bright, coloured disks appeared below us and came up to our altitude at a tremendous rate of climb."
That's just my personal impression of a possible "non-UFO" explanation, so be careful - I might be wrong  I think a contemporary suspicion was that the Germans were operating some kind of rocket weapon against the night fighters, but I'd think we'd have confirmation of such a weapon from the Luftwaffe side today.
Regards,
Henning (HoHun) |
| |
09-03-2007, 03:47 PM
|
#150 | | the old Sage
Join Date: May 2004 Location: Platonic Sphere
Posts: 8,940
Country: | Flak was firing scare-crow rounds.
also RAF crews swore they witnessed jet flyable He 219's as well as Me 163 Komets at night plus the Me 262 was supposed seen flyable and operable during late summer of 44 at night............nonsense but we have the reports anyway of all the above |
| | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:17 PM. |  | |