 | Which was the best night fighter?| Aviation Discuss Which was the best night fighter? in the World War II - Aviation forums; I agree with V2 - Mosquito NF.XXX... |
|
08-14-2006, 02:45 PM
|
#16 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Poland
Posts: 5,295
Country: | I agree with V2 - Mosquito NF.XXX
__________________ |
| |
08-15-2006, 05:49 AM
|
#17 | | Der Crewchief
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 28,590
Country: | I go for the Ju-88G-6 or the Mossie.
__________________ US Army Blackhawk Crewchief 2000-2006 Classic ww2aircraft.net quotes: fly boy said: "isn't that the first jet bomber? becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles" "wait what ok who made the b-2 crash come on people that messed up its a b-2" "ah yes the mistel those things are so annoying is games and in real life" |
| |
08-15-2006, 10:34 AM
|
#18 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,100
Country: | Quote: |
Originally Posted by DerAdlerIstGelandet I go for the Ju-88G-6 or the Mossie. | I don't think that I can argue against these being the best nightfighters in the war, however, they both would have shortcomings. It seems the main complaint against the P-61B was not manueverability, but was top speed, ceiling, climb rate, and speed brakes. The top speed of the P-61B was 366 mph, very comparable to the Mossie (37  and Ju-88G (around 356 - 390, I don't have top speed of the G-6 so the data shows G-1 and G-7). Ceiling of the P-61B was 33kft with both the Mossie and G-6 below at 28k and 29k respectively. So, some the very complaints against the P-61B (speed and ceiling), as pointed out as a concern in the Report on Joint Fighter Conference, would have also applied to the Mossie and Ju-88. Also, the sole reason for the P-61C was to correct these deficiencies so they were considered pretty significant. I think that nightfighters were for the most part compromises and that a really great nightfighter did not exist. |
| |
08-15-2006, 11:14 AM
|
#19 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: NIAGARA
Posts: 4,064
Country: | I don't think a lack manouverability would be a strike against a night fighter what you need is IMHO a steady platform so the AI or air intercept guy can get a target on his primitive display if you are flinging about the sky the AI is not going to be able to tune in his set . Playing with gains and such would require a steady platform .
__________________ |
| |
08-15-2006, 01:20 PM
|
#20 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Vivian, Louisiana
Posts: 316
Country: | I can't remember the test pilot that did it, but the demonstration pilot for the P-61 would take off, go vertical at the end of the runway, and pull through a loop and double back vertically at the opposite end of the runway to show off the capabilities of the Black Widow.
P-61 still gets my vote. Vote for skill of crew goes to the Germans, though... |
| |
08-15-2006, 01:25 PM
|
#21 | | the old Sage
Join Date: May 2004 Location: Platonic Sphere
Posts: 8,665
Country: | if you have data for the G-7 then you have it for the G-6 Junkers, there was no G-7 completed nor on operations it was only a G-6, and there were no sub-designations due to different radar sets either like the a, b or c which is all bogus. P-61C did not operated either in Ww 2 it was used soon after the war and based for the imminent probs in Korea or so it was to be supposed......
you are probably right about NO really great night fighter as all types wer upgraded throughout the war, the He 219 poor in my opinion was going through it's own problems of too much experimentation of variants even with rocket assisted take off, rear gunner or not to have one, rear warning radar or not to have one, and on it goes for that poor a/c
__________________ shhhh ........ es ist ein Geheimnis |
| |
08-16-2006, 03:31 PM
|
#22 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Edmonton,Alberta
Posts: 2,260
Country: | I agree with Syscom, I think the Mosquito was the best
__________________ Hello me...meet the real me.
And my misfits way of life.
A dark black past is my
Most valued possession.
Hindsight is always 20-20,
But looking back its still a bit fuzzy.
Speak of mutually assured destruction?
Nice story...tell it to readers digest!!! |
| |
08-16-2006, 09:15 PM
|
#23 | | Minister of Whoopass
Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Long Island Native in Mississippi
Posts: 12,536
Country: | I'll have to agree with the forum here and also say the Mossie XXX was the Best Night Fighter...
However, if I had my choice of which to fly and fight in, I'd pick the Ju 88G-6 with Schräge Musik.... Ju 88 night-fighters destroyed more Allied night bombers in WW2 than all other fighters combined... Erich, there is no truth to the below quote????
"The final production G series model was the Ju 88G-7, powered by two Jumo 213E engines with MW-50 power boosting to 1,800 hp on take-off. The Ju 88G-7a had FuG 220 Lichtenstein SN-2 radar, while the Ju 88G-7b had FuG 218 Neptune V radar with either the standard 'toasting fork' aerials or a Morgenstern array enclosed in a pointed wooden nose cone. The G-7c had FuG 240 Berlin N-1 centimetric radar with the scanner enclosed in a plywood nose cone. Only ten G-7c were completed, before the end of the war."
__________________ "Boyington was a Drunk, but He was a Drunk We'd Follow Straight Into Hell..."
-- Lt. William Northrop Case |
| |
08-16-2006, 09:34 PM
|
#24 | | the old Sage
Join Date: May 2004 Location: Platonic Sphere
Posts: 8,665
Country: | there were no designations in German for the difference in radars equipped in the Ju 88G-6. No a, b or c guys ............sorry it is all afterwar myths created within publications. the JU 88G-6 had MW 50 and I have some interesting escape stories associated with the craft and the Mossie NF.
__________________ shhhh ........ es ist ein Geheimnis |
| |
08-17-2006, 01:09 AM
|
#25 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Edmonton,Alberta
Posts: 2,260
Country: | Quote: |
Originally Posted by lesofprimus I'll have to agree with the forum here and also say the Mossie XXX was the Best Night Fighter...
However, if I had my choice of which to fly and fight in, I'd pick the Ju 88G-6 with Schräge Musik.... Ju 88 night-fighters destroyed more Allied night bombers in WW2 than all other fighters combined... | Yeah but how many were lost to allied fighters and door gunners?
__________________ Hello me...meet the real me.
And my misfits way of life.
A dark black past is my
Most valued possession.
Hindsight is always 20-20,
But looking back its still a bit fuzzy.
Speak of mutually assured destruction?
Nice story...tell it to readers digest!!! |
| |
08-17-2006, 04:45 AM
|
#26 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Royal Deeside/St Andrews, Scotland, UK (atm Pretoria, South Africa)
Posts: 10,823
Country: | I would go for the Mossie (MKXXX) as well with the Ju-88G6 in second.
__________________ "Success is not Final, Failure is not Fatal, it is the Courage to Continue that Counts"
Sir Winston Churchill "To him the people of the world largely owe the Freedom and liberties they enjoy today"
Enscription on Hugh Dowding's (AOC Fighter Command 1936-40) statue in London Moderator WW2 Talk: A WW2 Discussion Forum |
| |
08-21-2006, 07:48 PM
|
#27 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Stockport
Posts: 162
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by davparlr I The top speed of the P-61B was 366 mph, very omparable to the Mossie (37  and Ju-88G (around 356 - 390, I don't have top speed of the G-6 so the data shows G-1 and G-7). Ceiling of the P-61B was 33kft with both the Mossie and G-6 below at 28k and 29k respectively. . | The top speed of the Mosquito NF Mk 30 which first entered service in June 1944 was 424 mph at 26,500ft, operational ceiling was 35,000ft.
__________________ If in doubt........Panic!!!!!!! |
| |
01-10-2007, 03:37 PM
|
#28 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: AZ
Posts: 4
Country: | What about the P-82 Twin Mustang?
It replaced the P61 as the Air Force decided it outperformed and was a better solution.
David
RAFster |
| |
01-10-2007, 04:23 PM
|
#29 | | the old Sage
Join Date: May 2004 Location: Platonic Sphere
Posts: 8,665
Country: | never flew on ops in WW 2 that is why it is not considered |
| |
01-13-2007, 12:17 PM
|
#30 | | Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 74
Country: | FNG to the site Hello to all. Just enrolled, will take a while to go through the threads.
Have read some fairly, to me anyway, informed posts on the many topics.
For my first post, may I appeal for help in finding sources/photos about the four US Beau squadrons? I've written a book on the 417th NFS which comes out in Feb 07 (how's that for a plug?), but am starting one concerning all four, 414th-417th. Of special note would be photos of the 416th's Mossies.
Any guidance out there? I've a trip planned to the USAF Historical Research Agency planned for the spring, but any help now would be appreciated.
v/r,
brickhistory |
| | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:41 PM. |  | |