Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums
 



Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > World War II - Aviation > Aviation

Aviation Discussion on the aircraft of WWII.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-29-2008, 09:04 AM   #346
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Phila, Pa
Posts: 3,799
Quote:
Originally Posted by DerAdlerIstGelandet View Post
A few minutes into the flight he took a picture with flash. Me and the rest of the crew are yelling at him and he is just nodding and apologizing. A few minutes later he took another. Whilie he as grinning I took his camera and through it out the window.
I love it! Good job dude! He should've held on to that thing better. Stuff gets mighty slippery inside a helicopter at night. Especially cameras with a white flash.

On another note about the thread, does anyone have the numbers for night fighters on the following:

1. Intercepter missions flown by type (general type)?
2. Intruder missions flown by type (again, general type such as all Me-110)?
3. Number of aircraft shot down by each type?

The question is actually pretty simple to do the ground work on. If the data for the aircraft that shot down the most opposing aircraft is available, that would be a good step. Add in the number of sortes and you have a good line on what the best night fighter would be, at least for arguement's sake.
timshatz is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2008, 11:46 AM   #347
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Pine Mountain Lake, California
Posts: 981
Quote:
Originally Posted by BIG BIRD View Post
would'nt the flash of the guns make the pilots lose night vision. some german night fighters used 30mm cannons. 30mm= big flash.
A lot of night fighters had "flash hiders" on the muzzles of their cannons/machine guns, particularly when the guns were in front of the pilot (nose of the a/c, etc.); I don't know how effective they were, but if you look at pictures of night fighters (particularly the P-38M), you can see the flash hiders on the muzzles of the cannon/machine guns.

SoD Stitch is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2008, 12:32 PM   #348
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: broomfield, colo.
Posts: 47
I would think that the bf 110 would have the most sorties and kills becouse I think I read some were that the bf 110 made up 60% of the german night fighter force. I would think the mosquito would have the most intruder missions because they were sort of used as night escorts.
BIG BIRD is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2008, 02:01 PM   #349
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Phila, Pa
Posts: 3,799
Probably close to the truth on that one Big Bird. Figure it has to be a German Aircraft with the largest number of kills simply because it was working in a target rich environment.

Same to be said for the Mosquito.

Wornder if those stats are available.
timshatz is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2008, 02:35 PM   #350
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: broomfield, colo.
Posts: 47
Can enbody find the kill ratio of the hienkal he 219 uhu. They werent around in large enough unbers to shoot down 10,000 aircraft but I do think they had a big kill ratio.
BIG BIRD is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2008, 06:26 AM   #351
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by syscom3 View Post
I used to think the P61 was the best purpose built night fighter, but it was kind of slow (by 1945 standards).

I would say the Mosquito's were better, simply cause they were faster.

Ive seen some figures for a two man P38 night fighter that was quite fast and had a radar intercept system that was quite effective.
Until he died 4 or 5 years ago I was privileged to be an assistant to Group Captain John "Catseyes" Cunningham, who was, arguably, the finest night fighter pilot of WW2 and who pioneered the use of airborne radar to intercept Luftwaffe aircraft throughout the whole of WW2. Although he was too polite to actually laugh at the P-61, he held a very poor opinion of it as a nightfighter and told of many dummy interceptions he made on them without their crews ever being aware of his presence. This does, I think, reflect somewhat on the quality of US night fighter crews as much as the aircraft itself, but, I ask you, how could an aircraft as unwieldy and as huge as a P-61 ever compare favourably with a Mosquito or an UHU ? It just couldn't and it didn't !
marlin is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2008, 06:28 AM   #352
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by SoD Stitch View Post
A lot of night fighters had "flash hiders" on the muzzles of their cannons/machine guns, particularly when the guns were in front of the pilot (nose of the a/c, etc.); I don't know how effective they were, but if you look at pictures of night fighters (particularly the P-38M), you can see the flash hiders on the muzzles of the cannon/machine guns.

The Mosquito, being a tail dragger, had it's guns well tucked away under the nose and out of pilots eyeline.
marlin is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2008, 02:16 PM   #353
the old Sage
 
Erich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Platonic Sphere
Posts: 11,093
a couple of things the P-38M never flew in action during Ww 2. The P-61 was better at the pffensive night ground attack role. the Uhu was even too big, the Mossie could outdo them both. Considering the fact that the 61 was really all the US nf crews had and that their detection of LW a/c was not good at night I would say they did a fair job
Erich is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2008, 05:58 PM   #354
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,765
Hi Marlin,

>how could an aircraft as unwieldy and as huge as a P-61 ever compare favourably with a Mosquito or an UHU ?

Hm, it might not have been the best performance-wise, but it probably was the most manoeuvrable of the trio, and had the best single-engine handling characteristics. The Heinkel He 219 was medium ground in both respects, and the Mosquito had the best performance, but the poorest single-engine characteristics.

I'm relying on the P-61 manual (posted by Micdrow in the Technical Section), Eric Brown's description of the He 219 (in Wings of the Luftwaffe), and the data in the Mosquito Pilot's Notes (probably also found in the Technical Section here) for this comparison. I think I have posted more detail on this somehwere on this forum ... hm, not exactly what I thought I'd find, but here it is anyway:

----
Single-engine handling.

The Pilot's Notes for the Mosquito indicate that loaded to 17000 lbs, the single-engine safety speed was 178 mph (though it will climb on one engine at 155 - 161 mph if clean). Going around in a Mosquito on one engine is not possible with flaps set to more than 15°.

The F7F-3N for comparison had a stall speed "without fuel" of 86 mph - just to give a point of reference for the desired landing speed, which would be somewhat above the stall speed. (In carrier operations, probably by less than the 30% commonly used for land-based aircraft.)

The Me 110 according to a brief British manual for the type had a normal approach speed of 160 km/h (99 mph), so if the convention of approach speed being 30% higher than stall speed is followed, its stall speed probably was roughly 76 mph. Single-engined, it couldn't use full flaps and full power at the same time, but said brief manual points out that 25 degrees flaps were recommended, and though it's not explicitely stated, this invites the conclusion that it could use a good amount of power on the remaining engine in that configuration ... perhaps enough for a go-around.

The question of single-engined handling was important because as a rule of thumb, a twin-engined aircraft suffers an engine failure twice as frequently as a single-engined one. If you can't land a type on a carrier reliably on a single engine, it means you're going to lose aircraft that are twice as expensive as single-engined ones at twice the rate ... just a rough approximation, but it shows the motivation to choose a single-engined design over a twin.
----

Regards,

Henning (HoHun)
HoHun is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2008, 05:05 AM   #355
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 213
Quote:
Originally Posted by marlin View Post
Until he died 4 or 5 years ago I was privileged to be an assistant to Group Captain John "Catseyes" Cunningham
Hi Marlin:

Is there any book you'd recommend on G/C Cunningham? IIRC, he never published an autobiography.
mhuxt is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2008, 12:44 PM   #356
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lazio
Posts: 1,050
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erich View Post
the Uhu was even too big
if Uhu it's too big also the P-61 it's too big
Vincenzo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2008, 04:38 PM   #357
Senior Member
 
kool kitty89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,412
Quote:
Originally Posted by marlin View Post
The Mosquito, being a tail dragger, had it's guns well tucked away under the nose and out of pilots eyeline.
I believe the flash-hider refrence was in response to my question the Me 262's muzzel blast at night.
kool kitty89 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2008, 04:39 PM   #358
Senior Member
 
kool kitty89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,412
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erich View Post
a couple of things the P-38M never flew in action during Ww 2. The P-61 was better at the pffensive night ground attack role. the Uhu was even too big, the Mossie could outdo them both. Considering the fact that the 61 was really all the US nf crews had and that their detection of LW a/c was not good at night I would say they did a fair job
Wasn't the Ju 88 bigger than the He 219?
kool kitty89 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2008, 05:33 PM   #359
the old Sage
 
Erich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Platonic Sphere
Posts: 11,093
thickness wise yes as it could house 4 crewmen. the Uhu was skinny in the fuselage, with cramped out quarters the wingspan was quite long/wide depending how you look at it

I still go back that the P-61 was used for a good deal of the time as a ground attack unit which it was quite capable
Erich is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2008, 12:43 PM   #360
Junior Member
 
steelDUST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 12
I say it's the Ju-88G and He-219 V-1.
steelDUST is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Greatest Fighter Pilot of WWII... Finalized.... lesofprimus Polls 344 01-18-2010 04:29 PM
Best medium bomber? mosquitoman Aviation 200 09-02-2008 07:54 PM
The 9th FS Unit History... Nov 1944 - Sept 1945.... lesofprimus Stories 12 12-10-2006 06:06 PM
Air War's Greatest Aces... lesofprimus Stories 14 10-09-2006 01:45 PM
S/Ldr Karel M. "Kut" Kuttelwascher, DFC&Bar Pisis Stories 0 06-19-2005 02:37 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:32 PM.
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
Ad Management plugin by RedTyger
Design by HTWoRKS


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124