![]() |
| |||||||
| Aviation Discussion on the aircraft of WWII. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #16 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,475
| Doesnt the Me 262 actually have two engines. isnt this the best Single engined Fighters of WWII?
__________________ Do not judge on abilities, but on choices |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Helsinki
Posts: 1,560
| Uups! Hello Parsifal I stayed up too long last night, I corrected my mistake. Juha Last edited by Juha; 01-16-2009 at 04:52 AM. |
| | |
| | #18 |
| Minister of Whoopass ![]() Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Long Island Native in Mississippi
Posts: 18,452
| Maybe if someone would post up the options for each year that were competeing against each other...
__________________ My IL2 Video Tribute to My Grandfather: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HtzN5RuNNJk My 1/32nd Rendition of His Corsair: http://www.ww2aircraft.net/forum/2-p...3-a-20416.html |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: oregon
Posts: 4,187
| It also briefly occurred to me that from late 1943 to EOW that the F4U may be the best single fighter because it could perform basically all he fighter roles very well - except very high altitude interception. Escort, carrier/land based fleet defense and attack, fighter bomber, recon, night fighter. |
| | |
| | #20 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: oregon
Posts: 4,187
| |
| | |
| | #21 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Dordrecht
Posts: 4,044
| Quote:
__________________ ![]() "To attack 36 aircraft on your own was rather much" - Jan Linzel, D.XXI pilot. | |
| | |
| | #22 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Ohio
Posts: 269
| |
| | |
| | #23 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: oregon
Posts: 4,187
| |
| | |
| | #24 | |
| Der Crewchief ![]() Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 34,057
| Quote:
Hughes M230 Chain Gun can use 3 different kinds of rounds: -M788 Target Practice (TP) -M789 High Explosive Dual Purpose (HEDP) -M799 High Explosive Incendiary (HEI) Believe it or not, I actually saw an Apache that was giving us fire support on an air assault open up on a moving target (a motor boat in the water) with his 30mm and completely miss the target. Sorry to keep this offtopic, carry on with the original discussion...
__________________ ![]() fly boy:"isnt that the first jet bomber becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles" | |
| | |
| | #25 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: oregon
Posts: 4,187
| Quote:
I fired the 20mm on the AH-1J chin mount and was unimpressed with inherent accuracy... and suspect the AH-64 not much better. Last edited by drgondog; 01-17-2009 at 02:01 PM. | |
| | |
| | #26 | |
| Der Crewchief ![]() Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 34,057
| Quote:
__________________ ![]() fly boy:"isnt that the first jet bomber becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles" | |
| | |
| | #27 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Texas
Posts: 1,860
| I would vote for the Me 109 G6 A/S.
__________________ |
| | |
| | #28 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: oregon
Posts: 4,187
| |
| | |
| | #29 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Texas
Posts: 1,860
| I'm partial to the Me109. The G6/AS was the best variant in my opinion. I do like the Fw 190A8 the second best.
__________________ |
| | |
| | #30 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,193
| I could never vote for the 109. Everything I've read about the landings is borne out watching oen take off and land. It would scare the crap out of me. That sadly goes for the F4U as well. I think most of the problems with the 109's accidents are due to operation from unimproved runways when they weren't meant to be, but if I want to talk about the greatest fighter, I want one that can be operated anywhere. I have more emotional connection to a half dozen fighters than I have to this one, but time after time the P-51 comes at me as all around good in every prossible category. As much as I hate the concensus in anything, it's just the runaway best. It had the ceiling, speed, range, firepower, durability, turning ability, mass-production readiness, climb rate and lack fo bad habits that made it ridiculously well balanced. Of all the things that impress me about the Mustang though, as an enemy commander I would most fear its' range. It could show up anywhere and give you hell and make it home with a few gallons left in the tank as it taxied in. That is devastating. |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |