 | Best strafing aircraft in WWII???| Aviation Discuss Best strafing aircraft in WWII??? in the World War II - Aviation forums; Dear all, I came across to the article by MGen. Richard B.H. Lewis (ret.) giving an overview of strafing ... |
|
07-25-2007, 05:03 AM
|
#1 | | Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 32
Country:  | Best strafing aircraft in WWII???
Dear all, I came across to the article by MGen. Richard B.H. Lewis (ret.) giving an overview of strafing in the history of warfare. He also wrote: Among World War II strafing aircraft, few if any were more effective than the American B-25 Mitchell bomber. In the Pacific, it was used frequently on treetop-level missions against Japanese airfields and shipping, with great impact.
Source: http://www.afa.org/magazine/July2007/0707strafing.asp
What was in your opinion the best/most effective strafing aircraft in World War II?
Regards, Filip | 
|  | |
07-25-2007, 05:40 AM
|
#2 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Saffron Walden/Sheffield
Posts: 3,001
Country:  | B-25, A-20 or A-26 probably.
Honrable mentions to Beaufighter and Mosquito
__________________ 
When you realise that the light at the end of the tunnel is actually an oncoming train, you know it's time to run for your life | |
| | |
07-25-2007, 06:37 AM
|
#3 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Now in PA!
Posts: 628
Country:  | It is hard to argue with a B-25 firing fourteen .50's forward and all activated
by the push of a button on the pilot's control. | |
| | |
07-25-2007, 07:09 AM
|
#4 | | Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 32
Country: | There was a version of B-25 armed with a cannon so that the efectiveness even increased, isn't it? | |
| | |
07-25-2007, 07:15 AM
|
#5 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: London
Posts: 2,794
| Beaufighter | |
| | |
07-25-2007, 08:11 AM
|
#6 | | Older Than Dirt
Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Posts: 4,268
Country: | My vote goes to the B-25. It's a shame we didn't have the C-47 and C-130
gunships in WW-II ! They were awesome in 'Nam".
Charles
__________________  I believe in getting into hot water;
it keeps you clean..... | |
| | |
07-25-2007, 08:56 AM
|
#7 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Dordrecht
Posts: 1,903
Country:  | Quote:
Originally Posted by filnorm  There was a version of B-25 armed with a cannon so that the efectiveness even increased, isn't it? | Hmm, I think the B25 almost stalled when the 7.5 mm fired, something you don't want while strafing which always is at low altitude. Althoug a crashing airplane is of course very destructive 
Don't know if the guns really were effective in any role, but I'm sure some other members can tell something about that.
__________________ 
"I'm no hero. Soldiers on the ground, they are heroes. In an aircraft you can always evade the bullets."
-Jan Linzel, Dutch fighter pilot | |
| | |
07-25-2007, 09:59 AM
|
#8 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 315
Country:  | From regular fighters, Hurricane was also a very good strafing plane. A very stable platform for guns. 
__________________  | |
| | |
07-25-2007, 10:01 AM
|
#9 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Jersey Shore
Posts: 1,785
Country: | B-25J. They used to say that it could saw a boxcar in half. 
Honorable mention to the P-47 with it's eight wing mounted 50s.
__________________  “Let's get Enterprise and Hornet turned into the wind." | |
| | |
07-25-2007, 10:11 AM
|
#10 | | the old Sage
Join Date: May 2004 Location: Platonic Sphere
Posts: 8,789
Country: | I'll take the 8th AF P-51D for their wild work done on German AF during spring of 45. Some unbelievable record of ground kills for each group. Bill will have stats on the 355th fg records bar none
__________________
zerreißen Sie es oben ! | |
| | |
07-25-2007, 11:06 AM
|
#11 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: UK
Posts: 3,467
Country:  | Fire power wise I agree the B25J was a mighty beast and probably does deserve the title that amount of fire power against soft targets is pretty overwhelming, but I still think the Beaufighter was close behind as the dumpy nose gave superb forward vision and made for hedge hopping accurate runs at lower angles hence (how true I'm not sure) the "whispering death" nick name given by the Japanese. (not whistling death as for the Corsair)
Initially the mk1 with just the four 20mm under nose cannons suffered a pronounced dip when fired causing target drift but after various stages of development this problem was overcome and the addition of six wing mounted .303s increased the planes fire power. | |
| | |
07-25-2007, 11:07 AM
|
#12 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 2,134
Country: | Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcel Hmm, I think the B25 almost stalled when the 7.5 mm fired, something you don't want while strafing which always is at low altitude.
Don't know if the guns really were effective in any role, but I'm sure some other members can tell something about that. | The 75 mm cannon on the B25 was designed for anti-shipping in the pacific. In my mind, that is not strafing. Thats anti-shipping attack.
fourteen .50 cals.... now thats staffing!
__________________ “that can’t be a prop job....it’s got to be one of the 262 jets.”.... James Finnegan.
 | 
| | |
07-25-2007, 11:57 AM
|
#13 | | Member
Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Canada
Posts: 99
Country:  | throw in 8 rockets on the beaufighter and that is alotof lead coming at you | |
| | |
07-25-2007, 12:01 PM
|
#14 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 2,134
Country: | Quote:
Originally Posted by Bernhart throw in 8 rockets on the beaufighter and that is alotof lead coming at you | Perhaps we should decide what strafing is....
\ Strafing - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Strafing (adaptation of German strafen, to punish, specifically from the World War I humorous adaptation of the German catchphrase "Gott strafe England"), is the practice of firing on a static, or mobile targets of opportunity on land, sea, or air from a flying platform. The term is usually applied to machine gun or cannon fire from a variety of aircraft such as fixed-wing aircraft, helicopters, or unmanned aerial vehicles.
The thread is not about ground attack in general.. it is about strafing.
...
__________________ “that can’t be a prop job....it’s got to be one of the 262 jets.”.... James Finnegan.
| |
| | |
07-25-2007, 02:37 PM
|
#15 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Plymouth
Posts: 583
Country: | Would the better strafing aircraft be one that could destroy enemy targets, or one that could disrupt and disorientate them? | |
| | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode | 
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:00 PM. | | |
