Best Tank Killer of WW2 continued

[Erich]

stick with the Il-2, Hs 129 and the Panzerstaffeln Ju 87G which was designed to eliminate any Allied/Soviet tank. The Typhoon is much like the Fw 190F/G variants, modified single seaters to accept heavy cannon and racks for rockets and put in a ground attack role: Napalm was just a sort-arm for taking out large areas of compacted troops and MT's and not necessarily tanks

[the lancaster kicks ass]

I'm thinking the hurricane Mk.IID should also be included??

[CurzonDax]

Originally Posted by DerAdlerIstGelandet

Il give you that too. The Hs-129 would have been a marvelous aircraft had the damn engines been better.

To me, the Hs-129 is a "cult classic". It is overshadowed by the Stuka, P-47, Typhoons, and so on. It my fav anti-tank platform. But also was not a plane that was originally designed to be a AT plane, it only found its fame then and only in the Eastern Front where air supremacy and superiority was sometmies dicey.

On the other hand, P-47s, P-38s, P-51s (I know that they were not perfect for this role but they were used), Tempests, and Typhoons could switch to the fighter roll if jumped by the GAF (not that I would want to dogfight in a Tempest or a Typhoon). And I think that is the big difference between the Allied and Axis AT planes is that the Allied ones (and I am talking western Allies for the Stormavik was also not a good "fighter") could defend themselves as fighters when the need arose and still sock it to the Panzers.

:{)

[GT]

Update.

[Erich]

funny a thought just crossed my mind but I wish Tony Williams was available online here, as he has Allied vs real confirmation figures of the amount of tanks destroyed by single/twin engines of the RAF/US against German Panzers. I can asure you it is nothing what the Allies have claimed. My guess and I am going to have to dig out the correspondance with him and others but at least 1/2 if not more of the Allied claims are pure bogus

[DerAdlerIstGelandet]

Thats interesting. Would love to get some info on that Erich.

[the lancaster kicks ass]

yeah that should make very interesting reading Erich...........

[Udet]

Erich:

Have you read Niklas Zetterling´s account on the matter?

I found his work very illustrative as to the real accuracy of P-47s, Typhoons and Tempests attacking German armored columns.

Not only that the RAF hit a small number of panzers and vehicles, losses of fighter-bombers were heavy when greeted by Flak batteries attached to armored colums.

[Erich]

yes Udet............

major bummer for the Allies !! so much for rocket attacks and all the scores put in by the US 9th AF Jugs for ground kills.

If the work on heavy bomber targets could not be immediately applied it nevertheless provided a foundation for other studies of the battlefield. Schonland had long been anxious to know something concrete about the effectiveness of fighter and fighter bomber close support. This was an issue which was causing much difficulty between the army and air force and 21 Army Group badly wanted to know what was going on.

Major Pike had already studied one Typhoon attack on a German column near La Baleine in the American sector. Together with a young RAF Pilot Officer, Pike had surveyed the aftermath of the air attack and had noted that only one tank had actually been hit by a Typhoon rocket projectile. This report was not well received by Second Tactical Air Force (2 TAF) and the Pilot Officer was sent back to do the investigation again.99

On August 8th word came that the team was to proceed to the town of Mortain in the American zone. Here, the RAF proclaimed, the tactical air force had been "a decisive battle winning factor" in stopping the German counterattack to cut off the American troops south of Avranches. According to Air Marshal Coningham, the commander of Second Tactical Air Force, rocket firing typhoons claimed to have destroyed 89 tanks, probably destroyed another 56 tracked vehicles, set on fire 104 motor vehicles and saw 47 motor vehicles smoking. These claims do not include 56 enemy tanks damaged and 81 motor vehicles damaged. 100 It had been, the air force insisted, "The Day of the Typhoon."

The army OR section was not the only group interested in the Mortain battlefield. When Second Tactical Air Force was formed in 1943 it acquired operational research staff from Fighter and Army Cooperation Commands. Fighter Command had a good deal of experience with OR work and had amassed considerable information about attacks on ground targets. For example, in early 1943 a full scale model of a German artillery division with 48 mock guns and 558 dummy soldiers was created. "Every effort was made to aid the fighters and fighter bombers in their attack task, but neither Mustangs strafing, nor Typhoons firing their new rockets with 60 lb. warheads were able to inflict more than negligible damage on the position.""" A second experiment with a mock up troop of medium artillery produced equally dismal results.

A carefully controlled study of the ability of pilots to find specific positions on the ground produced even more startling information. Tactical Memorandum No.30, dated March 1943, reported that:

fighters, given a six figure map reference were unable to spot well camouflaged guns even when the guns were actually firing ... attacks on gun positions give negligible results for a high wastage and should only be ordered in an emergency. 102

After 2 TAF was established, OR studies continued to show that there were very real problems in attacking the kind of targets which were of interest to the army. Operations against a variety of targets were carefully examined in the pre D Day period. Typhoon rockets were found to hit a viaduct 500 yards long and 8 yards wide, one in 15 times. Bombs dropped from fighter bombers scored hits one in 82 times. Rocket Projectile (RP) attacks on gun positions produced results varying from 110 rockets fired at a casement in Courseulles sur Mer with zero hits to two hits out of 127 at Fontenay. Second TA F found all this disappointing, particularly since none of the targets had been "well defended."103

The Allied Expeditionary Air Force (AEAF) established a school for training fighter pilots in close support during 1944. Results were not encouraging, for while strafing was "outstandingly successful" for damaging or destroying soft skin vehicles, bombs and rockets could not be delivered accurately by average pilots. Near misses, it was found, did little damage. Even worse, accurate target location and identification of friendly troops proved to be an art which was readily mastered by very few pilotS.104

The AEAF operational research section concluded that the probability of pilot error in identifying friendly troops and the inaccuracy of rocket and bombing attacks meant that close support of army operations should be ordered only in an ernergenCy.105 This information confirmed 2 TAF's preference for missions involving armed reconnaissance, deep interdiction and the search for targets of opportunity well beyond the battle lines. Nothing in the first two months of the campaign had altered this view, but if the Typhoons had really stopped the German armour at Mortain the whole question of close support might need to be re examined and 2 TAF ordered its OR section to the scene of the battle.

The two rival OR groups began work at Mortain as soon as the German retreat cleared the area. For eight days, August 12th to August 20th, a not entirely friendly competition to locate and examine German tanks, self propelled guns and other vehicles was underway along the roads and lanes of the hilly countryside. Descriptive accounts of the battle, as well as air force claims, had prepared the investigators for scenes of devastation. A Panzer division, it was said, had been caught in a traffic jam caused by the crash of an Allied aircraft onto the lead tank in the column. Scores of panzers had been destroyed near St. Barth61emy, and this was just one among many stories that everyone had heard.

What the researchers saw was very different. Despite the most systematic search, very few wrecked tanks could be located. The army team borrowed an Auster aircraft to conduct a survey, but not a single additional vehicle was seen. In the end only 33 Panthers, 10 Mark IVs and 3 self propelled guns were uncovered. If armoured troop carriers, armoured cars and tank recovery vehicles were added, the total for all armour left behind in the area was 78. Nor was it possible to find many of the motor vehicles which the air force had claimed to have destroyed. Only 30 German trucks were available to investigate. While this discrepancy was difficult enough to account for, the results of the individual examination of vehicles was even more problematic. Nineteen of the 43 tanks had definitely been destroyed by US Army units. Only seven tanks showed signs of being struck by rocket projectiles. Two had been disabled by US Army Air Force bombing, seven had been abandoned without a mark on them, and four had been destroyed by their crews. The fate of just three tanks was judged to be from unknown causes .106

The Army OR group was quite prepared to accept the argument that air power might be credited for some of the abandoned and crew destroyed tanks. Their report, however, noted that these tanks could not be taken into consideration when comparing pilots' claims of having destroyed or damaged vehicles. Major Pike's dispassionate analysis of the evidence angered the RAF and provoked outrage at 2 TAF headquarters. An official air force review of the events was quickly developed. It is worth quoting at length:

Ground Investigation:
An attempt was made to examine the area on the ground within five days of the air attacks. However, at that time, fighting was still in progress and it was not until 20th August 1944 that the examination was completed. Nevertheless 39 tanks and 58 other vehicles, or the remains thereof, were examined. An analysis of the extent to which these were damaged is given below:

Destroyed . Damaged . Abandoned, Slightly damaged or untouched
Tanks . . . .24 . . 10 . . 5
Other Veh. . . 32 . . 23 . . 3

The German recovery service is remarkably efficient, and on this occasion there was very definite evidence that it had been as efficient as usual. Eye witnesses confirmed this fact. It can therefore be safely assumed that the vehicles found were only a small proportion of those actually destroyed and damaged, and probably an even smaller proportion of those which, although only slightly damaged, had been abandoned by their crews. To attribute destruction or damage to a particular arm or weapon is particularly difficult; however, taking into account the number of vehicles found, surrounded by rocket craters, and others with almost certain rocket or 20min strikes, it appears that the claims were reasonable. It is inevitable that when a large number of aircraft are operating in a comparatively small area, that certain claims will be duplicated. There is no reason to believe, however, that on this occasion the duplication resulted in anything but a small over statement of the damage inflicted.

Officers and other ranks who witnessed the attacks were effusive in their praise of their effectiveness. They freely admitted that had the counter attack continued with the same determination as before the Typhoons had appeared, they would have been unable to repel it."107

This was a serious distortion of the evidence which the Army OR group could not let pass unchallenged. Major Pike, in his report, directly contradicted the RAF view:

The efficiency of the German recovery system has been put forward as an explanation of the large discrepancy between the number of vehicles claimed to be destroyed and the actual number found. Tanks and lorries that are destroyed as a result of air attack are almost always burnt out and would not be worth salvaging unless time and labour were both very plentiful. Many prisoners have been questioned on the subject of the recovery of tanks and it has been established that burnt out tanks are never salvaged. In addition it has been ascertained that, contrary to certain statements made about the Mortain battle, very little recovery was done in this part of Normandy at the time; in fact the repair and recovery teams were already pulling out of Normandy when the battle of Mortain was at its height."108

The Army OR group agreed that the Allied Air Forces had a "considerable effect" on the German attack at Mortain. But nothing remotely resembling the air force claims could be justified. 1ndeed, in many areas of the battlefield, no signs of the characteristic rocket crater could be found. The RAF ought to have accepted this view, for it knew from its own recent research that there were serious aiming problems with rocket (and bomb equipped) Typhoons.

The most recent RAF study on the "accuracy of attacks" had been completed in June 1944. It showed that under the most favourable conditions average pilots were lucky to concentrate their rockets in a circle 150 yards in diameter. The report stated:

In order to hit a small target with R.P. the pilot must be at the right height and dive angle, have the correct speed, have his sight on the target and the right angular depression on his sight, make the correct wind allowances and be free from skid or 'g' ...

All of these factors are important but it is very difficult for a pilot to have them all right at the same time."109

The report raised the question of what really happened in combat when the pilot was also being harassed by anti aircraft fire. It concluded that previous views of the accuracy of RP attacks and of divebombing (which was even more subject to aiming error) were wrong. Such ideas must have been based on "the performance of a few very keen and experienced pilots who can hit small objects, such as tanks, with R.P.'s." Such men might be grouped into a "corps d’elite" capable of attacking special targets but only continual training and practice could improve the accuracy of most of the TAF pilots.""

The rival OR teams next raced north to examine the battlefield around Falaise and the roads leading to the Seine crossings. Here there were thousands of wrecked vehicles to investigate and a new round of argument over the role of air power to be waged. The army investigators would once again report that their three week investigation established beyond dispute that the devastation of the German forces in the area known as the "Shambles" was not due to direct air attack. Only 11 of 171 armoured fighting vehicles examined had been hit by bombs or rockets. No doubt the air force had assisted in destroying German morale strafing had accounted for a third of all soft skinned vehicle losses but, in the words of the OR report, the destruction of the German army had been achieved by 1and action.""'

The investigation of the Mortain battle continued to produce sparks. After one particularly nasty exchange, Brigadier Schonland suggested that "unless there were fairies in Normandy who could remove a large formation of tanks from the Mortain area,” 112 it was time to accept the evidence and act on the basis of fact, not fiction. But in the summer of 1944, 2 TAF was in no mood to discuss the issues raised by Army OR. In an official "Addenda" to the Army's Report the Air Force insisted that:

It would be wrong to regard the data provided in this report as yielding information on which to make recommendations for changes in weapons, tactics or operational doctrine, although the factual side of the report can itself be accepted. 113

If it was not permissible to use accepted data as the basis for recommendations about "changes in weapons, tactics or operational doctrine" then there was little point to further investigation of tactical air power. However, 21 Army Group was not about to give up its attempts to influence tactical air doctrine. A formal agreement was negotiated between Schonland and 2 TAF which provided for joint investigations of air operations against ground targets.

Air Force and Army OR researchers prepared four Joint Reports in the fall and winter of 1944-1945. 114 Again there was no disagreement about the evidence. For example, in Joint Report No.3 titled "Rocket Firing Typhoons in Close Support of Military Operations," it was found that 350 rockets, involving 44 sorties, would have to be fired at a small gun position to obtain a fifty percent chance of a hit.115 Typhoons were clearly weapons which were best used to reduce enemy morale and raise the morale of Allied infantry. Both doctrine and the manner of planning operations needed to be revised to take account of this new information as had been done in the US Ninth Air Force.116 The RAF, however, would not budge. The German offensive in the Ardennes provided the section with another opportunity to study the hard evidence on the role of tactical air power and once again their findings challenged the accepted interpretation. Almost the entire section was involved in the ground search while D.N. Royce worked his way down the line of communications interviewing prisoners of war. 117

[DerAdlerIstGelandet]

Damn thanks for the info.

[Gnomey]

Nice info Erich.

[Erich]

this is report number 4 written by the Number 2 of the ORS in NW Europe July and August of 44..........Mortain

Report No.4

Air Attacks on Enemy Tanks and Motor Transport in the Mortain Area, August 1944

Tactical Situation

1. At the beginning of August 1944, the Allied armies had begun their break out from the Normandy beach head; the British and Canadians were pushing southward from CAUMONT and CAEN and the Americans, having driven down the west coast of Normandy, were rapidly moving eastward and northwards thereby threatening to surround the German armies in Normandy.

2. The following diary of events in the MORTAIN area illustrates the circumstances in which the air attacks took place:
6 Aug. During the day the enemy counter attacked strongly against 30 Inf. Div in the MORTAIN area and they re occupied the town.
7 Aug. In the early morning the enemy launched a strong armoured attack in the MORTAIN area. Although small numbers of tanks penetrated U.S. positions at a few points, the situation was soon under control. During the day large enemy concentrations of tanks and MT were attacked from the air with excellent results.
8 Aug. Little change reported. Enemy still exerted pressure in the MORTAIN area.
9 Aug. The enemy continued his efforts to break through to Avranches with the greater part of his armoured formations. Although the enemy held MORTAIN, 4, 9 and 30 Inf. Divs. with 2 and 3 Armd. Divs. resisted strongly on the high ground to the north, west and south of the town. 35 Inf. Div. made some progress with an attack SW of MORTAIN.
10 Aug. SE of MORTAIN 2 Armd. Div. made progress, reaching a point 6 miles east of the town. Heavy concentrations of enemy armour (5 divisions) remained in the MORTAIN DOMFRONT area but no large scale counter attacks developed. 4, 9 and 30 Inf. Divs. continued to meet heavy opposition.
11 Aug. The enemy withdrew from the MORTAIN salient and the town was re occupied by troops of VII Corps. North and south of the town all divisions advanced against little or no opposition.

Air Effort

3. Bad weather prevented flying in the morning of 7 August but arrangements were made for the Second Tactical Air Force to come to the assistance of the IX US Air Force as soon as conditions permitted. The weather cleared quite suddenly about mid day, between which time and dusk 294 sorties were flown by typhoons of 2 TAF in support of the American ground forces in the MORTAIN area. Although, owing to their many other commitments in France, the IX USAAF only flew some 200 sorties to MORTAIN that afternoon, they continued their attacks over the next three days and flew 441 sorties in all.

4. Conditions on the afternoon of 7 August were ideal from the pilot's point of view as no opposition was encountered from enemy aircraft nor, till late in the day, was there any appreciable flak reaction. Under cover of mist and low cloud the Germans seemed to have neglected all normal precautions and, when the weather cleared, they were sighted in large numbers head to tail in narrow roads and lanes. The pilots reported that they were able to go in very close to attack, rockets being fired at 1000 yards range and cannon and machine guns from even closer. Claims made by the pilots during the MORTAIN Battle (7th 10th August) are shown in Table 1 below:

Table 1 - Pilots' Claims
. . . . Destroyed . Probably Destroyed . Damaged . Total
Armour
2 TAF . . . 84 . . 35 . . 21 . . 140
IX USAAF. . 69 . . .8 . . 35 . . 112
Totals. . . 153. . 43 . . 56 . . 252

MT
2 TAF . . . 54 . . 19 . . 39 . . 112
IX USAAF. . 94 . . .1 . . 21 . . 116
Totals. . .148 . . 20 . . 60 . . 228

Grand Total
(Armour & MT) . 301 . 63 . 116 . 480

Ground Investigation

5. Between 12 August and 20 August members of the Operational Research Sections from 21 Army Group and Second Tactical Air Force conducted separate ground investigations of the battle area around MORTAIN (see map at Appendix A). The results of the two investigations were compared and collated to produce the figures shown in Table II. (See opposite page)

6. It was not possible to discriminate between the victims of IX USAAF and of' 2 TAF because, although the 500 lb bomb was the favourite weapon of the former and the rocket that of the latter, American pilots fired some 600 rockets in the course of these attacks and British pilots dropped some bombs. The respective merits of the 50 calibre MG and the 20 mm cannon were not considered and all vehicles that had been destroyed by small projectiles fired from the air have been classed as "Cannon or MG."

7. Tanks and other vehicles classed as "abandoned" have not been included in the Air Total in Table 11 because, although they were probably abandoned as a result of air attack, they can hardly be considered to have been among those which the pilots claimed to have destroyed as such claims are generally supported by mentions of fire or explosion.

8. Similarly those enemy vehicles listed as "destroyed by crew" may be regarded as indirect victims of air attack but cannot justifiably be taken into consideration when comparing pilots' claims with what was found on the battlefield.

9. It is most unlikely that all of the unknown causes were due to air attack, particularly as many of them were found at considerable distances from the nearest signs of such attack and as ground forces were also fighting fierce battles in this area. However, if all the "Unknown causes" are added to the air totals, the resultant figures (armour, 21 + 15 = 36 and MT, 12 + 26 = 3 are still only about a quarter of the numbers claimed as destroyed by the air forces.



10. The area was not very extensive and as two teams were searching it over a period of several days it is not considered that any appreciable number vehicles was missed. This is confirmed by the fact that one of the investigators flew low over the area in an Auster, plotting the positions of vehicles seen from the air; no fresh vehicles were discovered by this means.

11. The efficiency of the German recovery system has been put forward as an explanation of the large discrepancy between the number of vehicles claimed to be destroyed and the actual numbers found. Tanks and lorries that are destroyed as a result of air attack are almost always burnt out and would not be worth salvaging unless time and labour were both plentiful. Many prisoners have been questioned on the subject of the recovery of tanks and it has been established that burnt out tanks are never salvaged. In addition it has been ascertained that, contrary to certain statements made about the MORTAIN battle, very little recovery was done in this part of Normandy at the time, in fact the repair and recovery teams were already pulling out of Normandy when the Battle of Mortain was at its height. In any case before considering the recovery of the "destroyed" tanks and MT, the "probably destroyed" (43 tanks and 20 MT) and the "damaged" (56 tanks and 60 MT) must have presented the recovery organisation with a large task without counting any that may have been damaged by the ground forces.

12. At Appendix B is a list of the vehicles found by members of No.2 Operational Research Section together with the causes of destruction where it was possible to assess them. No similar record is available for the vehicles which were examined only by members of ORS/2 TAF.

Conclusions

(a) The attacks by the Allied Air Forces had a considerable effect on the enemy's unsuccessful counter attack at MORTAIN.

(b) The number of vehicles claimed by the pilots as "destroyed" was about four times the actual number discovered.

(c) A number of vehicles, though not claimed by the pilots, were lost to the enemy by "indirect" air action (i.e. abandoned or destroyed by the crew).


Appendix B

1. Road Juvigny Le Tertre to St. Barthelmy
At pt 565145
2 Panthers
(a) AP shot above track on LHS of hull penetrated and killed some of crew. Gun, tracks, engine and petrol all O.K. No fire. Abandoned after AP hit but probably driven off road first.
(b) 105 mm HE ? strike 2 ft up from hull on LH rear corner of turret. Fragments damaged cupola and periscopes; also top hull plate torn (L shape 10” x 6”) just below strike: engine air louvres damaged.
Also 75 AP hit through bogies on LH side. Engine O.K. petrol O.K., gun O.K. Deep scoop by 75 AP on rear. Abandoned by crew unharmed: no bodies, no gore. There were 4 RP strikes in field on other side of road and one on this side hit tree at roadside.

Next field, same side of road
2 Panthers
(a) No visible sign of damage. Petrol, engine, tracks and gun all O.K. Even sights left on gun. Abandoned undamaged.
(b) Hit by 75 AP on LHSjust below turret in ammunition storage. Brewed up. Also hit on RH track and sprocket. None of these hits could have been from air.

Field north side of road, same place
3 Panthers, 1 Armd Car, 1 Armd Tp Carrier
(a) Panther received slanting blow into track and bogies on RHS. Definite RP hit as proved by debris but poor explosion as shown by small damage. Everything else in the tank quite O.K.
(b) Panther received 4 hits from 75 min AP (3 scooped and 1 penetrated) on underside of front, almost belly. This can only be exposed when climbing bank. Terrific brew up yet tyres on LHS untouched.
(c) Panther had 4 75 mm AP scoops on front glacis plate. Gun, engine, petrol and tracks all O.K. Deserted intact.
(d) Armd Car. RP crater and debris below RH front wheel; explosive force upwards and inwards. Brewed up.
(e) Armd Tp Carrier had 105 mm AP hit on LHS and was completed brewed up.

On N side of road, few yards further east.
Panther RP strike under rear had blown petrol tank and caused brew up.
At point 568147 in lane
Panther with two huge holes in turret from above. Also hit on leading edge of front glacis plate (probably RP). 2 75 AP scoops one on glacis and other on mantlet. Major damage (holes in turret) might have been RP but several bomb craters (500 lb.025 sec delay) within 15 yds suggest possible direct hit by bomb. Complete write off.

Few yards east along road
Armd Tp Carrier complete wreck as amn exploded and blew side off. Brew up from unknown causes.

Other side of road, same ref.
Panther RP strikes all along road but bazooka hit on LHS into amn stowage space caused brew up. Angle of attack suggests infantryman fired from high bank on roadside at almost point blank range could have been after desertion.

30 yds further east
2 Armd Tp Carriers, 1 Peoples Car (Amphibious)
(a) Arrad Tp Carrier with RP craters all round it. Complete wreck; looks like RP hit on RH rear corner.
(b) Armd Tp Carrier with downward strike through side armour and then floor. Almost definite RP.
(c) Peoples Car brewed up from unknown causes.

At point 570148
2 Armd Tp Carriers
(a) Direct hit RP. LH near burned out.
(b) RP hit from RH corner. Brew up.

South side of road
Panther with AP strike on turret. Brewed up.

Orchard W of cross roads
Ambulance and Armd Tp Carrier
(a) Ambulance peppered with fragments and abandoned.
(b) Armd Tp Carrier unknown causes brew up.

At cross roads 575144
Panther holes in floor over track which suggested downward attack but no possible entry for hit, therefore caused by explosion of gun. Unknown causes for brew up (possibly by crew).

2. Road from Cherence le Roussel via St. Barthelamy to Mortain
At point 556157
Arm Tp Carrier and Lorry
(a) Armd Tp Carrier: 3 RP strike very near; complete blow up and brew up; possible RP.
(b) Lorry completely wrecked by causes unknown.

Slightly east of 556157
Peoples' Car (Amphibious) completely destroyed by unknown causes. No RP strikes near.

In Bellefontaine
Opened Command Car with Rangefinder. 2 RP craters 2 yds from rear and many more in garden nearby. Brewed up probably RP.

East of Bellefontaine
Armd Tp Carrier and Lorry
(a) Armd Tp Carrier completely destroyed by unknown causes but RP strikes in neighbouring field.
(b) As above

Slightly further south
2 Panthers
(a) 5 AP hit in rear of hull caused brew up. Tracks O.K.
(b) Hit on RH sprocket. Abandoned and set on fire by crew.
Armd Tp Carrier: direct hit by unknown shell centre of LHS. Brew up.

At point 580138
Panther no visible cause of damage through bazooka and bits all around. Burnt out in entrance to lane; possibly set on fire by crew.
At same spot
Behind Panther in lane was a lorry quite burnt out and partly exploded. Destroyed by crew.

3. Road Mortain to Barenton
Note: No signs of RP strikes along this road. Some HE, but in general this main road was avoided by the Germans.
Panther wrecked from unknown causes at 619076.

At628071
An 88 mm gun riddled with HE fragments and end of barrel blown off.
Between there and Barenton
4 lorries destroyed by unknown causes; probably HE or cannon fire from air.

At point 620073
Panther on its side. Unknown shell hit (HE?)

4. Road Barenton to Ger. No RP strikes seen along this road.
88 mm A/T gun at 678066 abandoned.
4 lorries burnt out between Barenton and Le Gue Rochoux.

At point 693095
2 75 mm SP
(a) AP shot on LHS of gun shield. Brew up.
(b) Unknown hit on RHS. Brew up. Blew up and hurled gun away from chassis. Probably self destroyed as a result of bogging.

Other side of road
50 mm A/T gun with trail damaged but otherwise intact.
Armd Tp Carrier (to tow 50 mm A/T). Hole through bottom on RHS. LH wall blown off. Probably HE.

At point 695100
German saloon car riddled with HE fragments.

Half mile further on
Armd Tp Carrier amn exploded and blew back off. Front and engine O.K.

At 700105
Petrol carrying lorry burnt out and chassis warped by heat.
Another lorry wrecked just near.
This area bombed by 500 lb, one of which made crater across road near second lorry.

5. Ger Montain Road. No RP strikes seen near this road.
At 695137
German lorry burnt out. Causes unknown

1 km further on
Another burnt out lorry possibly HE.

Cross roads at Bire Feugeray
Burnt out lorry

1 km further west.
Ambulance and Lorry Both destroyed by unknown causes.

At 653124
Panther in lane. RH track very loose. Crew were about to repair when surprised. Petrol O.K. Gun O.K. Abandoned.

Few yds further west
75 SP (Mk 111 chassis) complete blow up with gun separate from body.
Peoples car abandoned.
Lorry burnt out.

At pt. 620119
2 lorries burnt out & 1 car wrecked unknown causes

At 597118
Armd Tp Carrier abandoned with front wheels removed (since).
One dead German on stretcher in back.

At 586123
Mk 111 with 75 mm hit by AP above track on RHS of hull. Brew up.

On other side of rly.
Another Mk 111 & Armd TP Carrier (both completely wrecked and burnt out).

6. Road Mortain to Sourdeval
At587140
German lorry burnt out with 500 lb bomb craters very near.

7/8 mile further north
Lorry and trailer burnt out.

At La Tournerie
Panther without turret, fitted up as recovery vehicle. Hole on front glacis plate exactly like that caused by magnetic bomb. Charred body inside. Burnt out lorry at same spot.

Between La Tournerie and Sourdeval
4 burnt out lorries, 2 M/C and Staff Cars burnt out; Peoples' Car abandoned (all possibly HE).

7. Road La Tournerie to St. Clement
Pt. 596145
Mk 111. RH track gone. Hit on rear at RHS by unknown shell. Inside O.K.

Pt. 610140
Panther. One bogey damaged. Both tracks off, being towed. Petrol O.K.; abandoned.
RP strikes in field each side of road and one on a tree at roadside near Panther.

Pt. 620142
Panther barrel gone. Minus tracks; was being recovered. Possibly self destroyed.
Tracked recce car, full of spare parts, used for recovery purposes. Burnt out on road and towed into field. Causes unknown.
Panther brewed up. Gun mantlet thrown forward suggesting demolition.

8. Road Le Gue Rochoux La Conerie Barenton
4 burnt out lorries. Causes unknown.

[DerAdlerIstGelandet]

Very interesting. I enjoyed reading that.

[Gnomey]

Nice info Erich.