Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums
 



Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > World War II - Aviation > Aviation

Aviation Discussion on the aircraft of WWII.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-10-2009, 03:29 PM   #1081
Banned
 
Dark Matter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 382
NNNNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!
Take it away, I cant stand it!!!!!!!!!
I hate the P-51!!!

Dark Matter is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2009, 05:18 PM   #1082
Senior Member
 
Elvis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Little Norway, U.S.A.
Posts: 811
Talking

...tee-hee-hee...



Elvis
Elvis is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2009, 05:19 AM   #1083
Member
 
river's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 78
Hi,

My first post

Interesting thread and considering the diversity of war and the machines designed to excel at certain aspects, there is no simple answer.

However, if I was put on the spot to select, what in my opinion, was the best aircraft of WW2, I'd say would be the ubiquitous JU-88. It was used as a bomber, night fighter, dive bomber, reconaissance, and a host of other missions. It was used throughout the entire war. It was one of the most versatile aircraft of its time.

The C47 is a close second, and while the need to supply the troops and war effort is supreme, it was the land supplies and ships that did the bulk of the support. Tanks, howitzers, munitions, food was mostly fed via ships to docks and then via land to the troops.

seeyuzz
river
river is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2009, 10:40 AM   #1084
Senior Member
 
mkloby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Jacksonville, NC
Posts: 3,562
Quote:
Originally Posted by SILVERFISH1992 View Post
NNNNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!
Take it away, I cant stand it!!!!!!!!!
I hate the P-51!!!

Why do you "hate" the P-51? It was a very capable aircraft that deserves its place in history even if it has acheived a mythical status.
__________________
If the Army and the Navy ever look on heaven's scenes, they will find the streets are guarded by United States Marines


mkloby is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2009, 10:49 AM   #1085
Senior Member
 
Doughboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 885
Quote:
Originally Posted by mkloby View Post
Why do you "hate" the P-51? It was a very capable aircraft that deserves its place in history even if it has acheived a mythical status.
My sentiments exactly.
__________________
"This is the day which the lord hath made; we will rejoice and be glad in it." Psalms 118:24



Doughboy is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2009, 09:15 PM   #1086
Banned
 
Dark Matter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 382
Thumbs down

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkloby View Post
Why do you "hate" the P-51? It was a very capable aircraft that deserves its place in history even if it has acheived a mythical status.

Becuase its not that even good of a plane.
Dark Matter is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2009, 09:48 PM   #1087
Senior Member
 
vikingBerserker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 3,760
Send a message via MSN to vikingBerserker Send a message via Yahoo to vikingBerserker
Seriously? I'm not a hardcore P-51 fan myself, but I have to recognize it's capabilities and achievements.
__________________
"Those who forget the past are condemned to repeat it"
"Those who dwell in the past, condemn the future"


vikingBerserker is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2009, 10:15 PM   #1088
Senior Member
 
Doughboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 885
Quote:
Originally Posted by SILVERFISH1992 View Post
Becuase its not that even good of a plane.
The P-51 was one of the best airplanes in WWII....So, how can you say it wasn't good? Please explain.
__________________
"This is the day which the lord hath made; we will rejoice and be glad in it." Psalms 118:24



Doughboy is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2009, 10:24 PM   #1089
Banned
 
Dark Matter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 382
Its an IL2 thing, its the one of the worst planes in IL2.

Its so overated too.

The P-51 was not the best, it was inferior to the Ki-84 and many, many, many other planes.

Last edited by Gnomey; 07-18-2009 at 08:08 AM.
Dark Matter is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2009, 11:30 PM   #1090
Senior Member
 
Doughboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 885
Quote:
Originally Posted by SILVERFISH1992 View Post
The P-51 was not the best, it was inferior to the Ki-84 and many, many, many other planes.
I said one of the best....What other planes was the P-51 inferior too?

"Its an IL2 thing, its the one of the worst planes in IL2."

Just because the P-51 isn't a good plane in IL2 doesn't mean it wasn't a good plane.
__________________
"This is the day which the lord hath made; we will rejoice and be glad in it." Psalms 118:24



Doughboy is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2009, 11:37 PM   #1091
Banned
 
Dark Matter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 382
It was inferior to the FW-190D, Me-262, Bf-109, La-7, Yak-3, temptest, corsair, P-38 and more.
Dark Matter is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2009, 11:49 PM   #1092
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: South Shore of Nova Scotia
Posts: 304
Ummm....You do realize that Il-2 is only a GAME, right?

The P-51 could put up a good fight against ANY prop fighter. And fly further than almost any other type.

:Hi-performance
:Excellent handling
:Excellent visibility
: Decent firepower
:Exceptional range
:Reliable
:Inexpensive

What more do ya want?

JL
Butters is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2009, 11:49 PM   #1093
Banned
 
Dark Matter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 382
Want more?

The Me-309, F8F, hawker sea furry, YP-80 and I'l be back with some more...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Butters View Post
Ummm....You do realize that Il-2 is only a GAME, right?

The P-51 could put up a good fight against ANY prop fighter. And fly further than almost any other type.

:Hi-performance
:Excellent handling
:Excellent visibility
: Decent firepower
:Exceptional range
:Reliable
:Inexpensive

What more do ya want?

JL

I would like low altitude performance, more munuverability and not stalling all the time.

And its not a "game" its a sim.

Last edited by Gnomey; 07-18-2009 at 08:08 AM.
Dark Matter is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2009, 12:27 AM   #1094
IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
 
FLYBOYJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 16,051
Quote:
Originally Posted by SILVERFISH1992 View Post

And its not a "game" its a sim.
a SIM is a device you could log time in as a rated pilot. I don't care if you have 100,000 hours on IL-2 or any other of those GAMES, unless the device is certified and operated so a RATED PILOT could log time on, its nothing but a GAME.
__________________
"IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT"
FLYBOYJ is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2009, 03:34 AM   #1095
Member
 
river's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 78
Hi,

Crikey mate, are you basing your perception of the P51 on how it is portrayed in the IL-2 Game?

river
river is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Weird World War 2 Facts Smokey Aviation 154 09-13-2009 12:35 PM
Italy v. England - Air to air DAVIDICUS Aviation 193 07-22-2009 01:58 PM
Air Force test team launches 'overhauled' Iraqi aircraft Royzee617 SitRep 0 04-28-2006 11:53 AM
War of 1812. plan_D Old Threads 39 05-09-2005 07:15 PM
The Story of Charles Hoffman Crazy Stories 4 06-19-2004 08:50 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:37 PM.
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Ad Management plugin by RedTyger
Design by HTWoRKS


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118