Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums
 



Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > World War II - Aviation > Aviation

Aviation Discussion on the aircraft of WWII.

View Poll Results: P-40 vs Bf 109
Curtiss P-40 Warhawk 15 19.23%
Messerschmitt Bf 109 63 80.77%
Voters: 78. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-01-2009, 04:24 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
beaupower32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Charleston, South Carolina
Posts: 1,295
Bf-109 vs P-40

Going off of the Hurricane vs 110 thread, how about a bf-109 vs P-40 thread. To me, it is very hard to think which one is better, but I think it will have to come down to pilot in the end. Lets hear your thoughts.
__________________


The Gates of Hell are open Day and Night.
A Guilty Conscience is the Hell of a Living Soul.
Abandon All Hope, You who Enter here.

Dante's Inferno
beaupower32 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2009, 04:29 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Montrose, Colorado
Posts: 3,525
Whew! I think that the P40 was considered as dessert for the 109. The P40 would have to be well flown with mutual support tactics to survive against BF 109s.
renrich is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2009, 08:56 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
MikeGazdik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Ohio
Posts: 273
Talking

I will just wait till the Messerschmitt comes down to me in my Curtiss!
MikeGazdik is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2009, 09:45 PM   #4
The Pop-Tart Whisperer
 
Njaco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: South Jersey, United States
Posts: 11,823
If you're in the P-40 I think the only advantage would be for you to go down to the Bf 109s and then get the 'ell out of there!
__________________

"If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it's English, thank a soldier!"

Njaco is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2009, 10:06 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
MikeGazdik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Ohio
Posts: 273
I think the P-40 (USAAF) in the MTO, had well over 500 aerial kills. Sure the Bf 109 has the advantage on paper. But it would not be dessert.
MikeGazdik is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2009, 01:05 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
Clay_Allison's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,193
At low alt, it was even. When the Germans realized that P-40 lost performance above 17,000 feet, they hunted higher and fought with energy and killed them pretty bad.

The war department minimized the need for high altitude operations and retarded development of the two-stage supercharger for the Allison (by indicating that they weren't interested). Thus the P-40, the P-39, the P-51A and to a lesser extent the P-38 suffered from their short sightedness.

The P-40 was, in my opinion, a better AIRFRAME than the Me-109. Just the Me-109 landing gear (or operational lack thereof) is enough evidence for me. The DB 600 series engines were masterpieces though and elevated an inferior airframe to being a better overall fighter plane.
Clay_Allison is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2009, 06:02 AM   #7
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 339
I don't see where you get that from. The P-40s landing gear wasn't exactly a marvel either and its arrangement was aerodynamically inefficient. Most articles I have read describe the P-40's airframe as overly complex for a single engined fighter (e.g. 5 spar wing). I do think the P-40s, in its Kittyhawk variants, were decently armed and overall acceptable fighters, but inferior to Spitfire and Bf 109 not to even mention the Mustang.

Last edited by KrazyKraut; 01-02-2009 at 06:14 AM.
KrazyKraut is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2009, 06:33 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
beaupower32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Charleston, South Carolina
Posts: 1,295
[QUOTE=Clay_Allison;435685]At low alt, it was even. When the Germans realized that P-40 lost performance above 17,000 feet, they hunted higher and fought with energy and killed them pretty bad.
QUOTE]


I will agree here. At low alt, pretty even. Up high, the 109 really shined against the P-40.
__________________


The Gates of Hell are open Day and Night.
A Guilty Conscience is the Hell of a Living Soul.
Abandon All Hope, You who Enter here.

Dante's Inferno
beaupower32 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2009, 07:02 AM   #9
Banned
 
Soren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,625
The Bf-109F was much faster, climbed much quicker and turned much tighter. So the Bf-109F was no doubt the better a/c, but pilot skill can easily make up the difference.
Soren is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2009, 02:03 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
Clay_Allison's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,193
Quote:
Originally Posted by KrazyKraut View Post
I don't see where you get that from. The P-40s landing gear wasn't exactly a marvel either and its arrangement was aerodynamically inefficient. Most articles I have read describe the P-40's airframe as overly complex for a single engined fighter (e.g. 5 spar wing). I do think the P-40s, in its Kittyhawk variants, were decently armed and overall acceptable fighters, but inferior to Spitfire and Bf 109 not to even mention the Mustang.
1/3 of all 109s built were destroyed in takeoff and landing accidents. That's ridiculous. Nothing like that happened to the P-40.
Clay_Allison is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2009, 02:19 PM   #11
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 339
Where's the source for that? We recently had some numbers on landing accidents of German fighters here and they showed no extraordinarily high rates for the Bf 109. Certainly there were fighters with more robust landing gears, but the 109 was superior to the P-40 in much more relevant aspects.
KrazyKraut is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2009, 02:24 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Montrose, Colorado
Posts: 3,525
As stated in another thread, the P40 had 592 kills in the Med. I suspect that few of those were 109s. The "Star of Africa", I believe, on his best day claimed 17 kills. Most of those were P40s.
renrich is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2009, 02:27 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lazio
Posts: 1,078
they had 592 claims
Vincenzo is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2009, 02:29 PM   #14
Der Crewchief
 
DerAdlerIstGelandet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 34,079
Gotta go with Bf 109 here.

I think it was a better airframe overall, better performance where it counted the most (later varients our performed it at all areas I believe but do not take my word on it, this is off of memory) and Armament was better.
__________________


fly boy:"isnt that the first jet bomber becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"
DerAdlerIstGelandet is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2009, 02:46 PM   #15
Senior Member
 
beaupower32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Charleston, South Carolina
Posts: 1,295
Quote:
Originally Posted by renrich View Post
As stated in another thread, the P40 had 592 kills in the Med. I suspect that few of those were 109s. The "Star of Africa", I believe, on his best day claimed 17 kills. Most of those were P40s.

Here is what I found. Dont know about the times being accurate, but might give a indacation of how the day went down.

On September 1st 1942 (ironically, a 3rd anniversary of outbreak of the war) Marseille down 17 allies planes in three sorties. His first encounter that day was with a P-40 which had attack Stukas. It went down in flames rather quickly. Then six Spitfires acting as escort to Kittyhawks dropped down on Bf-109s. Marseille lowered his flaps and throttling back almost staling his aircraft, causing Spitfires to shoot past him. The last got a full course meal from of Jochen's 20-mm canons and machine guns. The British fighter literally disintegrated in mid air. In the short skirmish which then transpired, another Spit was victimized by Marseille, as well as a second P-40 trying to escape on deck.

Times of victories: 08:28; 08:30; 08:33; 08:39.

On his second flight that morning, Jochen flew top cover for Ju-87s. They ran into big party of DAF fighters and bombers. Marseille with his wingman intercepted eight P-40s on their dive for Stukas, and allies planes formed the circle soon after this. He shot down two of his opponents immediately and the circle broke up. As they scattered, Jochen knocked down three more. He took his sixth after short chase, with a very long deflection shot. Throughout all this, his wingman flew close cover. They both climbed up again only to spot another flight of unsuspecting Kittyhawks. Marseille approached alone and shot down his seventh. After turning home he came upon yet another P-40 trailing white smoke. It became his eighth in this flight and probably was his easiest victim.

Times of victories: 10:55; 10:56; 10:58; 10:59; 11:01; 11:02; 11:03; 11:05.

Eight aircraft in ten minutes! Back in the base, as soon as he opened the canopy of his 109, he learned that Feldmarschall Kesselring was visiting his unit. Upon reporting to Operations HQ tent, Marseille declared 12 enemy aircraft shot down. Kesselring inquired of him the number he shot himself, and Jochen replied accordingly: "Twelve, Sir". His supreme commander did not say a word. Later, he admitted to being astonished. That was a very busy day for all pilots of the JG-27. After a meal and a short rest, Marseille departed as an escort to Ju-88s which were seeking to bomb British troops concentrations. The battle of Alam el Halfa was at its highest point. Fifteen P-40s attacked Junkers, which in turn were attacked by Marseille's pilots. A series of dogfights erupted which gradually brought fighting aircraft from 5,000 feet to almost ground level. In this aerial fracas the "Eagle of Africa" shot down another five P-40s.

Times of victories: 18:46; 18:47; 18:48; 18:49; 18:53.
__________________


The Gates of Hell are open Day and Night.
A Guilty Conscience is the Hell of a Living Soul.
Abandon All Hope, You who Enter here.

Dante's Inferno
beaupower32 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:23 PM.
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
Ad Management plugin by RedTyger
Design by HTWoRKS


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125