Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums

Bomber v Bomber

Aviation Discuss Bomber v Bomber in the World War II - Aviation forums; The interesting link posted a while ago about the Wellington v Ju88 got me thinking (hmm sometimes a dangerous thing). ...


Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > World War II - Aviation > Aviation

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 02-02-2006, 09:28 AM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 24
Country:
Bomber v Bomber

The interesting link posted a while ago about the Wellington v Ju88 got me thinking (hmm sometimes a dangerous thing).

Did Bomber v Bomber combats often take place - I would guess the most common type of meetings between these type of aircraft would be patrol craft like the FW200, JU290 running into Sunderlands, Whitley's, Wellingtons and the odd patrol Lanc.

If these types of aircraft did encounter each other is an engagement a pretty forgone conclusion or would they go there separate ways, if combat did take place would the generally heavier armaments of the FW200 and JU's be an advantage as they had a few 20mm cannon. Sunderlands although having a heavy armament only had 303's (I'm quite prepared to be proved wrong on that).

Thanks.
NR61 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2006, 10:02 AM   #2
the old Sage
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Platonic Sphere
Posts: 8,665
Country:
friend the Ju 290's of FAGr 5 faced seaborne Hurricanes. I think we chatted about this in an older thread on the Ju 290.
__________________
shhhh ........ es ist ein Geheimnis
Erich is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2006, 03:00 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: London
Posts: 2,760
I know that the British used Baltimores against German transports in the Med with some success. Also there was a British B26 pilot who got three kills using it against transports and a Ju290. He died a few months ago and it was in his orbitury in the paper
Glider is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2006, 07:54 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
DaveB.inVa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 224
One of the best Ive heard involved a guy who died a few years ago named Col. Edwin Loberg. He was involved in a running 45 minute dogfight between a B-17 and a Kawanishi Mavis 4 engined flying boat. The fight is the subject of a Stan Stokes painting and the story can be found here!!

http://www.neam.org/58dogfight.htm
__________________
Fighter pilots make movies....
Bomber pilots make history!
DaveB.inVa is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2006, 10:04 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Aggie08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 970
Country:
Send a message via AIM to Aggie08
Dang! What were the "mortal tail guns" of the boat? 20mm or something? come to think of it what was the majority of the armament on that?
__________________
"I had ten rockets on board, and as I wasn't particularly fond of head-on attacks, I salvoed the whole lot at him. The rockets didn't hit him but but they must have scared the bejesus out of him, for he did a steep turn to starboard... I let him have the full blast, all eight fifty-calibers. I had never seen an aircraft completely disintegrate in the air the way this Me-110 did..."
Bill Dunn, 406th Fighter Group



Matt
Aggie08 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2006, 07:20 AM   #6
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 24
Country:
The Warbird Resource site lists the Mavis as having a 20mm tail gun

http://www.warbirdsresourcegroup.org...anishih6k.html
NR61 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2006, 10:32 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
R Leonard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 411
Country:
USN and USMC patrol, bombing, patrol-bombing, and photo recon squadrons were credited with 131 multi-engined Japanese aircraft types during the war. USMC night fighter squadrons, operating PVs, were also credited with 5 multi-engined shoot downs, 4 G4M and 1 Lockheed Type 14-38 (yes, the Japanese started the war with about 30 of these, acquired in 193. PVs were generally in USN patrol-bombing squadron, at first VB and then after 1 October 1944 designated VPB, or USMC night fighter squadrons (VMF(N))

For the entire war:
USN PB2Ys in VP squadrons were credited with 5 G4M and 1 H6K.
A USN VP-23 PBY was credited with 1 H6K.
USN PB4Ys in VB, VD, and VPB squadrons were credited with 11 G3M, 46 G4M, 6 H6K, 10 H8K, 14 Ki-57, 2 J1N, 2 Ki-21, 2 Ki-45, 5 Ki-46, 2 Ki-51, 14 Ki-57/L4M, 6 L2D (Japanese licensed production DC-3), 13 DC-2 (yes, as with the Lockheed 14-38s, the Japanese did have DC-2s, starting the war with about at least 14, purchased in 193, and 1 each P1Y, Q1W, and Ki-49.
USN PVs from VB-148 were credited with 2 G4M.

Of course, this doesn’t begin to address the single engine types credited to the USN and USMC multi-engined patrol, patrol-bombing, and night fighter squadrons. On the other hand, overall, from the entire war, there were a total of 28 PB4Y, 36 PBY, 3 PBM, and 6 PV shot down by enemy aircraft (1 PBY and 1 PV night fighter from these totals were USMC, the remainder were USN). These losses include those lost to single engine types, which, of course were the source of almost all the losses.

I don’t have credit to loss by type for the entire war, but I do for the period 1 Sep 1944 to 1 Sep 1945. In this last year of the war there were 64 USN multi-engine vs multi-engine credits. Almost all of them went to the PB4Y patrol and photo recon squadrons, which garnered a total of 63. There were no USN aircraft in these actions. PB4Y credits for this period were 7 G3M, 14 G4M, 3 Ki-45, 3 Ki-46, 3 Ki-51, 2 Ki-21, 1 P1Y, 1 Q1Y, 8 DC-2, 6 L2D, 14 Ki-57/L4M, 5 H8K, and 3 H6K. The sole other multi-engined credit was split between two PB2Ys from VPB-13 for an H6K.


Rich
__________________
hmmm ... I wonder what this switch does ...
R Leonard is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2006, 10:45 AM   #8
IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
 
FLYBOYJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 12,518
Country:
In the book "Forty US Fifth Air Force Aircraft" Profile 31 - B-25 shoots down a Japanese Sally over open water of the Bismarck Sea.
__________________
"IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT"
FLYBOYJ is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2006, 06:07 AM   #9
Master of Ewes
 
the lancaster kicks ass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,959
Country:
Send a message via MSN to the lancaster kicks ass
i wouldn't have thought it'd happen too often, most would ignore each other.........
__________________

"Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy."
the lancaster kicks ass is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2006, 06:11 AM   #10
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 9
Quote:
Originally Posted by FLYBOYJ
In the book "Forty US Fifth Air Force Aircraft" Profile 31 - B-25 shoots down a Japanese Sally over open water of the Bismarck Sea.
Indeed, i had read that.
my feel is so high, but can you tell me more detail?please!
krupp is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2006, 06:16 AM   #11
Der Crewchief
 
DerAdlerIstGelandet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 28,590
Country:
Re: Bomber v Bomber

Quote:
Originally Posted by NR61
The interesting link posted a while ago about the Wellington v Ju88 got me thinking (hmm sometimes a dangerous thing).

Did Bomber v Bomber combats often take place - I would guess the most common type of meetings between these type of aircraft would be patrol craft like the FW200, JU290 running into Sunderlands, Whitley's, Wellingtons and the odd patrol Lanc.

If these types of aircraft did encounter each other is an engagement a pretty forgone conclusion or would they go there separate ways, if combat did take place would the generally heavier armaments of the FW200 and JU's be an advantage as they had a few 20mm cannon. Sunderlands although having a heavy armament only had 303's (I'm quite prepared to be proved wrong on that).

Thanks.
I think the most common encounter would be with Ju-88s because Ju-88s were used as night fighters more than they were as bombers anyhow.
__________________

US Army Blackhawk Crewchief 2000-2006

Classic ww2aircraft.net quotes:

fly boy said: "isn't that the first jet bomber? becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"

"wait what ok who made the b-2 crash come on people that messed up its a b-2"

"ah yes the mistel those things are so annoying is games and in real life"
DerAdlerIstGelandet is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2006, 06:13 AM   #12
Senior Member
 
Wildcat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 3,168
Country:
Correct, Sunderlands and Ju-88's often clashed over the Bay Of Biscay. One famous battle took place in june 1943, when a Sunderland from 461 squadron RAAF was attacked by 8 ju-88's. The aircraft fought for 45 minutes with 3 Ju-88's being shot down and 2 more probables. The Ju-88's eventually decided to brake off the engagement and head for home. The Sunderland eventually made it back to the English Coast, albeit with one engine out, over 500 bullet holes, radio shot out and several crew members, including the pilot, wounded.
__________________
Wildcat is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2006, 06:50 AM   #13
Minister of Whoopass
 
lesofprimus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Long Island Native in Mississippi
Posts: 12,536
Country:
Great info Leonard....
__________________


"Boyington was a Drunk, but He was a Drunk We'd Follow Straight Into Hell..."
--Lt. William Northrop Case
lesofprimus is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2006, 06:59 AM   #14
Der Crewchief
 
DerAdlerIstGelandet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 28,590
Country:
Wow that battle had to suck and was definatly hard fought. Any more info on the crew?
__________________

US Army Blackhawk Crewchief 2000-2006

Classic ww2aircraft.net quotes:

fly boy said: "isn't that the first jet bomber? becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"

"wait what ok who made the b-2 crash come on people that messed up its a b-2"

"ah yes the mistel those things are so annoying is games and in real life"
DerAdlerIstGelandet is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2006, 05:35 AM   #15
Senior Member
 
Wildcat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 3,168
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by DerAdlerIstGelandet
Wow that battle had to suck and was definatly hard fought. Any more info on the crew?
I agree, one hell of a fight! As for the crew the pilot, Flt Lt Walker, was injured when a bullet hit the compass causing it to explode and spray him with blazing alcohol. The rear gunner was knocked unconscious when he hit his head from the violent evasive action. When he did come too, he, along with the midships gunner Flt Sgt Fuller, shot down one of the Ju-88's.
The flight engineer was found dead at the gun he was manning. The Navigator took a round in the leg, while the Ist pilot and W/O where also injured. These blokes obviously weren't going without a fight!!
__________________
Wildcat is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
   

AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com Avitop.com


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83