Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums
 



Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > World War II - Aviation > Aviation

Aviation Discussion on the aircraft of WWII.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-17-2009, 08:18 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 914
Brewster Battler?

I was reading through a wartime 'Observers book of Airplanes' this afternoon and on the entry for the Brewster Buffalo it ended with the line 'it is now being succeeded by the Brewster Battler'.

Does anyone have any information on what a Battler actually was? Although I have had this book for many years this is the first time I have noticed this reference.

__________________
BlondeValkyrie - Bugger off and host your OWN pictures you thieving twat
Waynos is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2009, 09:31 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
vikingBerserker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 3,768
Send a message via MSN to vikingBerserker Send a message via Yahoo to vikingBerserker
I believe was the F3A, the Brewster built F4U Corsair - which due to quality issues never reached the front lines.
__________________
"Those who forget the past are condemned to repeat it"
"Those who dwell in the past, condemn the future"


vikingBerserker is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2009, 12:55 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Marcel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dordrecht
Posts: 3,834
Don't know the name, but I believe this would have succeeded the Buffalo, design 33A, carrier borne fighter:
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Brewster.jpg (36.0 KB, 111 views)
__________________

" The knack of flying lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss."
Marcel is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2009, 06:37 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Messy1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Ankeny, Iowa
Posts: 1,411
I doubt it would have amounted to much coming from Brewster. Not sure any aircraft they built (should have said designed) was anything special. I know Brewster was famous for its low quality and horrible output.
__________________
Bryon O
P-61 Black Widow-Mistress of the Night!


"No bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country."
George S. Patton

"Listen, strange women lyin' in ponds distributin' swords is no basis for a system of government."

"Oh but if I went 'round sayin' I was Emperor, just because some moistened bint lobbed a scimitar at me, they'd put me away."
Messy1 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2009, 08:47 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Elvis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Little Norway, U.S.A.
Posts: 811
It was a case of too small of a company trying to fill too big of an order.
Unfortuantely, Brewster never saw fit to re-do their facilities, and this increased tension between them and the US government, until finally, the government just went with other makers.
I believe VikingBerserker is correct on identifiying the "Battler".
FWIW, the F2A-1 that was used by the Finns actually had pretty good performance and a hard punch.
Someone around here once quoted that one could turn through 180 degrees @ 2000 metres in something like 7 seconds, which was quicker than just about anything else in the ETO, and the climb rate (at around 3050 fpm), was also very good.


Elvis

Last edited by Elvis; 06-21-2009 at 07:17 PM.
Elvis is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2009, 08:39 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 914
Thanks guys, that one had me stumped. Plus Marcel, I'm a sucker for design models so thanks for that too!
__________________
BlondeValkyrie - Bugger off and host your OWN pictures you thieving twat
Waynos is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2009, 08:13 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,081
Quote:
Originally Posted by Waynos View Post
I was reading through a wartime 'Observers book of Airplanes' this afternoon and on the entry for the Brewster Buffalo it ended with the line 'it is now being succeeded by the Brewster Battler'.
Not an isolated case Wayne. The "Battler" is mentioned in this RAAF aircraft identification booklet from 1943 describing it as having "succeeded the Buffalo in production".

Graeme is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:44 AM.
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Ad Management plugin by RedTyger
Design by HTWoRKS


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118