Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums
 



Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > World War II - Aviation > Aviation

Aviation Discussion on the aircraft of WWII.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-23-2005, 01:26 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cupertino, CA
Posts: 183
Convergence of fighter guns.

I am curious about the range at which the wing mounted machine guns on American fighters were set to converge. Did all the guns converge at the same point or did some converge at a closer or farther point?

Also, were they all set to converge on the same flat, level plane consistent with the gun mounts themselves or did some fire higher or lower at the convergence point?
__________________
MAGISTER
Magister is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2005, 01:56 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
syscom3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 10,805
I believe it was 300 yards convergence
__________________
"Pilot to copilot..... what are those mountain goats doing up here in the clouds?"
syscom3 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2005, 05:17 PM   #3
"World Traveller"
 
Gnomey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Royal Deeside/St Andrews, Scotland, UK
Posts: 16,490
Send a message via AIM to Gnomey Send a message via MSN to Gnomey
Quote:
Originally Posted by syscom3
I believe it was 300 yards convergence
That was the standard although some pilots prefered to have the guns converge closer (normally around 200-250 yards).
__________________


"Success is not Final, Failure is not Fatal, it is the Courage to Continue that Counts"
Sir Winston Churchill

"To him the People of the World Largely owe the Freedom and Liberties they Enjoy Today"
Enscription on Hugh Dowding's (AOC Fighter Command 1936-40) statue in London


WW2 Talk: A WW2 Discussion Forum

My Photo Collections on Flickr
Gnomey is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2005, 06:27 PM   #4
IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
 
FLYBOYJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 16,835
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gnomey
Quote:
Originally Posted by syscom3
I believe it was 300 yards convergence
That was the standard although some pilots prefered to have the guns converge closer (normally around 200-250 yards).
correct...
__________________
> I Support Doug Gillis <
FLYBOYJ is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2005, 06:51 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cupertino, CA
Posts: 183
Of course it would depend on where the strikes were (as would be the case with a 20mm) but does anyone know on average, how many strikes were reqired of .50 cal. rounds to bring an axis fighter down?
__________________
MAGISTER
Magister is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2005, 07:18 PM   #6
IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
 
FLYBOYJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 16,835
Quote:
Originally Posted by Magister
Of course it would depend on where the strikes were (as would be the case with a 20mm) but does anyone know on average, how many strikes were reqired of .50 cal. rounds to bring an axis fighter down?
One if you hit the pilot!

Are you talking a Zero or a FW-190, Oscar or MC-200? I don't think any one ever kept statistics by rounds....
__________________
> I Support Doug Gillis <
FLYBOYJ is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2005, 07:32 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cupertino, CA
Posts: 183
There was data (rough) developed as to the average number of 20mm and 30mm hits it took to bring down a heavy allied bomber. I was just wondering if anyone had heard any similar rough data concerning the .50 against any axis fighters.
__________________
MAGISTER
Magister is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2005, 01:07 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 167
I have too heard anywhere between 250 and 300 yds., depending on the pilot's preference. One of the advantages of the P-38...........
V-1710 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2005, 03:31 AM   #9
Senior Member
 
loomaluftwaffe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,848
concentrated firepower, unlike most allied fighters.

i know 1-2 bursts will bring down a ki-43 or a zero
loomaluftwaffe is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2005, 05:13 PM   #10
Banned
 
Lunatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 191
Normally guns were set to converge at 800 feet. They were usually also set to converge into a "box", i.e. for 6 guns, 2 would be aimed dead on, two a little higher, and two a little higher still.

With convergence set at 800 feet, the "kill zone" ranges from about 400 feet to about 1200 feet. At these ranges, the left and right streams are half or less there wing spacing apart. At closer ranges, you don't need so many hits, and at longer ranges, scoring at all was difficult.

Some pilots did set the convergence closer, but not many - there was little utility in it. More pilots had it set longer, mostly when they were expecting to strafe ground targets. For strafing, convergences of 1500-2000 feet, or infinity (ie no convergence) were often used.

When the K-14 gunsight came out, convergences were generally increased to about 1000-1200 feet.

=S=

Lunatic
Lunatic is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2005, 05:20 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
wmaxt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 1,175
I've heard about 250yrds. the P-47 frequently had two one set of four at 250 and the other set of four at 350yrds. Ring's P.R. O. Doc's research Page http://prodocs.netfirms.com/ has a diagram.

The P-38 had all guns in the nose and had kills that were reportedly at 1,000yrds.

wmaxt
wmaxt is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2005, 01:31 AM   #12
Banned
 
Lunatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 191
Quote:
Originally Posted by wmaxt
I've heard about 250yrds. the P-47 frequently had two one set of four at 250 and the other set of four at 350yrds. Ring's P.R. O. Doc's research Page http://prodocs.netfirms.com/ has a diagram.

The P-38 had all guns in the nose and had kills that were reportedly at 1,000yrds.

wmaxt
Yes, the P-47 did often use two convergence settings. The 6 wing gun planes generally did not.

There are documented cases of the P-47 (and probably P-51's) scoring kills at 800+ yards. When the K-14 came into action, effective range increased. Often the enemy thought he was out of range and got walluped.

=S=

Lunatic
Lunatic is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2005, 04:02 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
wmaxt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 1,175
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lunatic
There are documented cases of the P-47 (and probably P-51's) scoring kills at 800+ yards. When the K-14 came into action, effective range increased. Often the enemy thought he was out of range and got walluped.

=S=

Lunatic
The pilots who got hits at extream ranges were exceptional shots with the P-38 and even more so with converging guns of a P-47/P-51 where you only got a couple of guns on the target. It also demonstrates the effectiveness of the .50 gun.

wmaxt
wmaxt is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2005, 05:46 PM   #14
Senior Member
 
Dogwalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Manziana Field, near Rome
Posts: 260
I read that convergence for P51 was usually set at 300 yards, and 2 degrees above.

DogW
__________________
Dogwalker is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2005, 04:38 AM   #15
Banned
 
Lunatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 191
Quote:
Originally Posted by wmaxt
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lunatic
There are documented cases of the P-47 (and probably P-51's) scoring kills at 800+ yards. When the K-14 came into action, effective range increased. Often the enemy thought he was out of range and got walluped.

=S=

Lunatic
The pilots who got hits at extream ranges were exceptional shots with the P-38 and even more so with converging guns of a P-47/P-51 where you only got a couple of guns on the target. It also demonstrates the effectiveness of the .50 gun.

wmaxt
After the computing gunsights came out, some squadrons set their convergences out at over 400 yards. This was later in the war and they were doing more strafing - longer convergence is better for strafing where you want to start firing at 1000 yards or even more.

Somewhere I have a documented case of a P-47 pilot scoring two kills from 800+ yards in the same sortie. In both cases the target did not even try to evade until it was too late, the pilot thinking he was safe. The range when using the K-14 gunsight is displayed as the ranging knob is twisted to put the ring on the target.

Against a non evading target the K-14 was totally devestating, allowing almost a sure kill even at quite long range. If the pipper was on the target and the ring was set to the proper wingspan and fitted to the target you practically could not miss.

=S=

Lunatic
Lunatic is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:00 AM.
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
Ad Management plugin by RedTyger
Design by HTWoRKS


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125