 | Convergence of fighter guns.| Aviation Discuss Convergence of fighter guns. in the World War II - Aviation forums; I am curious about the range at which the wing mounted machine guns on American fighters were set to converge. ... |
|
12-23-2005, 01:26 PM
|
#1 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Cupertino, CA
Posts: 105
| Convergence of fighter guns. I am curious about the range at which the wing mounted machine guns on American fighters were set to converge. Did all the guns converge at the same point or did some converge at a closer or farther point?
Also, were they all set to converge on the same flat, level plane consistent with the gun mounts themselves or did some fire higher or lower at the convergence point?
__________________ MAGISTER |
| |
12-23-2005, 01:56 PM
|
#2 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 7,876
| I believe it was 300 yards convergence
__________________ "Pilot to copilot..... what are those mountain goats doing up here in the clouds?" |
| |
12-23-2005, 05:17 PM
|
#3 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Royal Deeside/St Andrews, Scotland, UK (atm Pretoria, South Africa)
Posts: 10,823
Country: | Quote: |
Originally Posted by syscom3 I believe it was 300 yards convergence | That was the standard although some pilots prefered to have the guns converge closer (normally around 200-250 yards).
__________________ "Success is not Final, Failure is not Fatal, it is the Courage to Continue that Counts"
Sir Winston Churchill "To him the people of the world largely owe the Freedom and liberties they enjoy today"
Enscription on Hugh Dowding's (AOC Fighter Command 1936-40) statue in London Moderator WW2 Talk: A WW2 Discussion Forum |
| |
12-23-2005, 06:27 PM
|
#4 | | IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 12,537
Country: | Quote: |
Originally Posted by Gnomey Quote: |
Originally Posted by syscom3 I believe it was 300 yards convergence | That was the standard although some pilots prefered to have the guns converge closer (normally around 200-250 yards). | correct...
__________________ "IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT" |
| |
12-23-2005, 06:51 PM
|
#5 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Cupertino, CA
Posts: 105
| Of course it would depend on where the strikes were (as would be the case with a 20mm) but does anyone know on average, how many strikes were reqired of .50 cal. rounds to bring an axis fighter down?
__________________ MAGISTER |
| |
12-23-2005, 07:18 PM
|
#6 | | IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 12,537
Country: | Quote: |
Originally Posted by Magister Of course it would depend on where the strikes were (as would be the case with a 20mm) but does anyone know on average, how many strikes were reqired of .50 cal. rounds to bring an axis fighter down? | One if you hit the pilot!
Are you talking a Zero or a FW-190, Oscar or MC-200? I don't think any one ever kept statistics by rounds....
__________________ "IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT" |
| |
12-23-2005, 07:32 PM
|
#7 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Cupertino, CA
Posts: 105
| There was data (rough) developed as to the average number of 20mm and 30mm hits it took to bring down a heavy allied bomber. I was just wondering if anyone had heard any similar rough data concerning the .50 against any axis fighters.
__________________ MAGISTER |
| |
12-24-2005, 01:07 AM
|
#8 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 151
| I have too heard anywhere between 250 and 300 yds., depending on the pilot's preference. One of the advantages of the P-38........... |
| |
12-24-2005, 03:31 AM
|
#9 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,848
Country: | concentrated firepower, unlike most allied fighters.
i know 1-2 bursts will bring down a ki-43 or a zero |
| |
12-25-2005, 05:13 PM
|
#10 | | Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 191
| Normally guns were set to converge at 800 feet. They were usually also set to converge into a "box", i.e. for 6 guns, 2 would be aimed dead on, two a little higher, and two a little higher still.
With convergence set at 800 feet, the "kill zone" ranges from about 400 feet to about 1200 feet. At these ranges, the left and right streams are half or less there wing spacing apart. At closer ranges, you don't need so many hits, and at longer ranges, scoring at all was difficult.
Some pilots did set the convergence closer, but not many - there was little utility in it. More pilots had it set longer, mostly when they were expecting to strafe ground targets. For strafing, convergences of 1500-2000 feet, or infinity (ie no convergence) were often used.
When the K-14 gunsight came out, convergences were generally increased to about 1000-1200 feet.
=S=
Lunatic |
| |
12-25-2005, 05:20 PM
|
#11 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 1,178
| I've heard about 250yrds. the P-47 frequently had two one set of four at 250 and the other set of four at 350yrds. Ring's P.R. O. Doc's research Page http://prodocs.netfirms.com/ has a diagram.
The P-38 had all guns in the nose and had kills that were reportedly at 1,000yrds.
wmaxt |
| |
12-26-2005, 01:31 AM
|
#12 | | Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 191
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by wmaxt I've heard about 250yrds. the P-47 frequently had two one set of four at 250 and the other set of four at 350yrds. Ring's P.R. O. Doc's research Page http://prodocs.netfirms.com/ has a diagram.
The P-38 had all guns in the nose and had kills that were reportedly at 1,000yrds.
wmaxt | Yes, the P-47 did often use two convergence settings. The 6 wing gun planes generally did not.
There are documented cases of the P-47 (and probably P-51's) scoring kills at 800+ yards. When the K-14 came into action, effective range increased. Often the enemy thought he was out of range and got walluped.
=S=
Lunatic |
| |
12-26-2005, 04:02 PM
|
#13 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 1,178
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by Lunatic There are documented cases of the P-47 (and probably P-51's) scoring kills at 800+ yards. When the K-14 came into action, effective range increased. Often the enemy thought he was out of range and got walluped.
=S=
Lunatic | The pilots who got hits at extream ranges were exceptional shots with the P-38 and even more so with converging guns of a P-47/P-51 where you only got a couple of guns on the target. It also demonstrates the effectiveness of the .50 gun.
wmaxt |
| |
12-26-2005, 05:46 PM
|
#14 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Manziana Field, near Rome
Posts: 260
| I read that convergence for P51 was usually set at 300 yards, and 2 degrees above.
DogW
__________________ |
| |
12-27-2005, 04:38 AM
|
#15 | | Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 191
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by wmaxt Quote: |
Originally Posted by Lunatic There are documented cases of the P-47 (and probably P-51's) scoring kills at 800+ yards. When the K-14 came into action, effective range increased. Often the enemy thought he was out of range and got walluped.
=S=
Lunatic | The pilots who got hits at extream ranges were exceptional shots with the P-38 and even more so with converging guns of a P-47/P-51 where you only got a couple of guns on the target. It also demonstrates the effectiveness of the .50 gun.
wmaxt | After the computing gunsights came out, some squadrons set their convergences out at over 400 yards. This was later in the war and they were doing more strafing - longer convergence is better for strafing where you want to start firing at 1000 yards or even more.
Somewhere I have a documented case of a P-47 pilot scoring two kills from 800+ yards in the same sortie. In both cases the target did not even try to evade until it was too late, the pilot thinking he was safe. The range when using the K-14 gunsight is displayed as the ranging knob is twisted to put the ring on the target.
Against a non evading target the K-14 was totally devestating, allowing almost a sure kill even at quite long range. If the pipper was on the target and the ring was set to the proper wingspan and fitted to the target you practically could not miss.
=S=
Lunatic |
| | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:29 AM. |  | |