ADS NOT DISPLAYED TO REGISTERED USERS.
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 24
Like Tree2Likes

Fighter or bomber depending on USAAF pilot size

Aviation Discuss Fighter or bomber depending on USAAF pilot size in the World War II - Aviation forums; Hello everyone. I've been a member of that forum for quite a long time, reading it very frequently, but it's ...

  1. #1
    Junior Member eWildcat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    3
    Country
    France

    Fighter or bomber depending on USAAF pilot size

    Hello everyone.

    I've been a member of that forum for quite a long time, reading it very frequently, but it's the first time I write a post.

    I have a question I hope some of you may answer, regarding this article about Bob Hoover that a member of another forum brought to us:

    Airport Journals

    On his first orientation flight in a Stearman PT-17, his instructor did a roll, and then asked him to try one. After Hoover completed a perfect roll, and then followed up with four-, eight- and 16-point rolls, as well as other advanced maneuvers, the instructor informed his commanding officer of the new pilot's talent. Hoover was soon showing other instructors what he could do in the airplane, and the CO asked the 20-year-old to put on a 30-minute demonstration for the other cadets on graduation day.



    Hoover thought he was finally on the way to being a qualified fighter pilot. But, he was sent to basic training at Greenville, Miss., and then to Columbus, Miss., for advanced twin-engine training. That meant he would eventually fly transports or bombers.

    "I wanted to be a fighter pilot in the worst way," he said.

    Shorter pilots were likely to go to fighter training and taller ones to bombers and transports. At six feet, two inches, Hoover definitely had a problem, as did a short friend, who wanted to go to transports but had been given a fighter assignment. The two developed a plan and visited a sergeant in the personnel office.
    So we wonder if what is described in the article, i.e. you were more likely to be chosen for fighters if you were shorter, is something you were aware of at the time in the USAAF and, if it is true, would someone know what the reasons for it were?

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    pound va
    Posts
    1,668
    Country
    United States
    Only so much adjustabilty can be built into a fighter cockpit. You can adjust the pedals back and forth on most, some the seat can be adjusted up and down.
    Just like a car, but usually more adjustments possible. But there are limits, and most bombers would have more excess room.

    I remember in Army WOFT there were a one guy that had to stand a little extra tall, because he didn't actually meet the minimum height requirments, and several that had to slouch, because they were over the maximum. But i'm not positive what either limit was, I think it was 5'4" to 6' 2".

    From the pilots i've know, a few left over WW2 veterans, and pilots I was around in the 60's and 70's, most were not tall.

  3. #3
    Senior Member davebender's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    5,221
    Country
    United States

    P-47 had roomy cockpit

    The P-47 was our most numerous WWII era fighter aircraft. From what I understand it had a relatively roomy cockpit.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    2,884
    Country
    United Kingdom
    Quote Originally Posted by davebender View Post
    The P-47 was our most numerous WWII era fighter aircraft. From what I understand it had a relatively roomy cockpit.
    Yep.Evasive action in a P-47 meant running around the cockpit .

    Many Luftwaffe fighters had very little adjustment for the seat and none for rudder pedals.They were also very cramped and must have been a squeeze for some of the bigger pilots. There were some fairly tall men flying them,Germans generally are not small.

    Cheers

    Steve

  5. #5
    Senior Member davebender's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    5,221
    Country
    United States

    Many Luftwaffe fighters had very little adjustment for the seat

    Me-109 had an adjustable seat and I suspect the Fw-190 did also. However these aircraft (especially Me-109) had a narrow cockpit with little headroom.

    A modern day pilot on the History Channel suggested a P-47 cockpit was as roomy as the F-15 and more roomy then the F-22.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    2,884
    Country
    United Kingdom
    Quote Originally Posted by davebender View Post
    Me-109 had an adjustable seat and I suspect the Fw-190 did also.
    Both those German fighters had adjustable seats. Judging by the position of the adjustment lever on the Fw 190 I doubt it could be adjusted in flight. I remember reading somewhere that the seat on the 109 could only be adjusted on the ground too.

    Cheers

    Steve

  7. #7
    Senior Member renrich's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Montrose, Colorado
    Posts
    4,534
    Country
    United States
    The P39 was designed for a 5' 8" pilot.

  8. #8
    IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO FLYBOYJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Colorado, USA
    Posts
    20,526
    Country
    United States
    When the government request design proposals from manufacturers for a military aircraft there are usually volumes of support documents that specify such things as hardware and material requirements, requirements for exterior lighting, performance requirements for radios, etc., etc., etc. I would bet dollars to donuts that way back in the late 30s, early 40s there were requirements for fighter aircraft cockpit seats and minimum or maximum size they were allowed to be built to. Based on that specification is where I believe the height requirements came about for pilots.

    Just for some Trivia - American Vernon Keogh who flew for the RAF during the BoB was the smalest fighter pilot in the RAF until his death in 1941. He was 4'10"

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    pound va
    Posts
    1,668
    Country
    United States
    Quote Originally Posted by FLYBOYJ View Post
    When the government request design proposals from manufacturers for a military aircraft there are usually volumes of support documents that specify such things as hardware and material requirements, requirements for exterior lighting, performance requirements for radios, etc., etc., etc. I would bet dollars to donuts that way back in the late 30s, early 40s there were requirements for fighter aircraft cockpit seats and minimum or maximum size they were allowed to be built to. Based on that specification is where I believe the height requirements came about for pilots.

    Just for some Trivia - American Vernon Keogh who flew for the RAF during the BoB was the smalest fighter pilot in the RAF until his death in 1941. He was 4'10"
    I understand he sat on extra cushions under his parachute seatpack to be high enough in the cockpit. But I wonder how he reached the rudder pedals ?

  10. #10
    Senior Member bobbysocks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    1,915
    Country
    United States
    a very enterprising mechanic probably fashioned him pedal extensions of some sort... ???

    i do recall hearing that a lot of the cadets that washed out of fighter training went to bomber groups...some to fly and some as gunners.
    Last edited by bobbysocks; 08-08-2012 at 06:04 PM.

  11. #11
    Senior Member renrich's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Montrose, Colorado
    Posts
    4,534
    Country
    United States
    The pilots who flew the Corsair had an interesting situation. The cockpit was tailored for the chief test pilot who was 6' 4''.

  12. #12
    Der Crew Chief DerAdlerIstGelandet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    USA/Germany
    Posts
    39,283
    Country
    United States
    Country II
    Germany
    Quote Originally Posted by stona View Post
    There were some fairly tall men flying them,Germans generally are not small.
    Actually I think you will find quite the opposite, at least during that time frame.

    The majority of my original uniforms look like they would fit a scrawny teenager...
    Last edited by DerAdlerIstGelandet; 08-08-2012 at 07:18 PM.


    fly boy:"isnt that the first jet bomber becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"

  13. #13
    Senior Member davparlr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    2,534
    Country
    United States
    We had a Marine in my pilot training class who was rather large. His helmet stuck up above the canopy breaker mounted on top of the ejection seat in the T-38. I suspect he was very hopeful the canopy would eject normally or his head was going to lead the ejection seat through the canopy, if he had to eject. probably would not be so bad for a Marine!

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    249
    Robert Johnson and Dick Bong were both little guys. Johnson used extra cushions in his Jug, but I think the seat adjusted enough for Bong in the Lightning.

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    249
    On the other end of the scale, Red Fiebelkorn was the biggest fighter pilot in the ETO. He shot Nowotny down. Sadly, he was the first US flyer to lose his life in Korea.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 124
    Last Post: 06-08-2011, 01:42 PM
  2. Ground attack aircraft questions
    By Zeus in forum Aviation
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 08-30-2007, 11:20 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86