 | Which fighters were "thick skinned?"| Aviation Discuss Which fighters were "thick skinned?" in the World War II - Aviation forums; The P-51's wings were very fragile when it comes to thier aerodynamic properties. They were only expected to ... |
|
04-17-2005, 09:12 PM
|
#46 | | | The P-51's wings were very fragile when it comes to thier aerodynamic properties. They were only expected to exhibit laminar flow properties through about the first 50 hours of flight time. Great care not to distort the surface was recommended.
Flyboy, my point is that the P-47 required no special care. They would have a man out on the wing, way out about 6 feet from the tip, to direct the plane into position to takeoff. When it was time for him to jump down, he'd stand up and trot over to the back of the wing root and slide off. And they were in combat boots. The P-47 is said to have had "double thick" skinning, though I've not been able to specifically confirm that it was indeed twice as thick as other US fighters. I suspect it was noticably thicker, but not twice as thick.
I think if you can nab the full version of the P-47 "in color" film you will see the flight crews doing what I've noted above.
=S=
Lunatic | |
| |
04-17-2005, 09:44 PM
|
#47 | | IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 13,227
Country: | Quote: |
Originally Posted by RG_Lunatic The P-51's wings were very fragile when it comes to thier aerodynamic properties. They were only expected to exhibit laminar flow properties through about the first 50 hours of flight time. Great care not to distort the surface was recommended.
Flyboy, my point is that the P-47 required no special care. They would have a man out on the wing, way out about 6 feet from the tip, to direct the plane into position to takeoff. When it was time for him to jump down, he'd stand up and trot over to the back of the wing root and slide off. And they were in combat boots. The P-47 is said to have had "double thick" skinning, though I've not been able to specifically confirm that it was indeed twice as thick as other US fighters. I suspect it was noticably thicker, but not twice as thick.
I think if you can nab the full version of the P-47 "in color" film you will see the flight crews doing what I've noted above.
=S=
Lunatic | Yes - I totally understand what you're saying. With the Mustang as you said with its laminar wing, I'm sure when it first entered service this was closely watched, but say by Korea, the ground pounders were probably stomping all over those wings! Sometimes maitainers are their own worse enemys! 
__________________ "IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT" |
| |
04-17-2005, 10:11 PM
|
#48 | | | By Korea none of the P-51's had any laminar flow at all. Under perfect condtions the characteristic could last as much as 200 flight hours, but 50 was the reasonable expectation, and many did not hold it even that long. Since the life expectancy of a fighter in combat was 20-30 hours, it was not considered an issue.
=S=
Lunatic | |
| |
04-17-2005, 10:19 PM
|
#49 | | IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 13,227
Country: | Yep - I'm with you, I got my boots on right now! 
__________________ "IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT" |
| |
04-18-2005, 03:46 AM
|
#50 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,778
| And I repeat: Both the Spit, 109 and 190's wings could be walked on (Boots or not) without sustaining ANY damage AT ALL !
__________________ We have built a total of about 1250 of this aircraft (Me-262), but only fifty were allowed to be used as fighters - as interceptors. And out of this fifty, there were never more than 25 operational. So we had only a very, very few.
- Adolf Galland |
| |
04-18-2005, 06:38 AM
|
#51 | | Banned
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 795
| Now this is a tough wing.  |
| |
04-18-2005, 09:37 AM
|
#52 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Saffron Walden/Sheffield
Posts: 3,001
Country: | It was quite a thick wing- that's why the Tiffie was no good at altitude
__________________ 
When you realise that the light at the end of the tunnel is actually an oncoming train, you know it's time to run for your life |
| |
04-18-2005, 10:00 AM
|
#53 | | Master of Ewes
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,959
Country: | but brilliant at lower altitudes.........
but that pic with all the guys on the wing is amazing!!
__________________ 
"Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy." |
| |
04-18-2005, 10:05 AM
|
#54 | | IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 13,227
Country: | If you seen how wing spars are made (machined and heat treated) you'll realize that airplanes are a lot tougher than you think!
__________________ "IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT" |
| |
04-18-2005, 01:46 PM
|
#55 | | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by Soren And I repeat: Both the Spit, 109 and 190's wings could be walked on (Boots or not) without sustaining ANY damage AT ALL ! | One picture of a guy on a spit wing, carefully posed with his weight upon the spar, is not "proof". All the FW photos are totally irrelevant, the person standing is right at the wing root, or is quite near the root and we cannot see his feet, or in the last pic he's either sitting or kneeling on the wing or he's actually on a ladder or something on the far side of the wing. | |
| |
04-18-2005, 05:04 PM
|
#56 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,778
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by RG_Lunatic
One picture of a guy on a spit wing, carefully posed with his weight upon the spar, is not "proof". | Quote: |
Originally Posted by RG_Lunatic All the FW photos are totally irrelevant, the person standing is right at the wing root, or is quite near the root and we cannot see his feet, or in the last pic he's either sitting or kneeling on the wing or he's actually on a ladder or something on the far side of the wing. | Ladder ??!!! You must be blind !!
__________________ We have built a total of about 1250 of this aircraft (Me-262), but only fifty were allowed to be used as fighters - as interceptors. And out of this fifty, there were never more than 25 operational. So we had only a very, very few.
- Adolf Galland |
| |
04-18-2005, 05:44 PM
|
#57 | | | Oh really? Well, I am pretty sure it is you who is "blind". Take a good look Soren:
On first glance, it appears the man is sitting on the wing facing away from the camera. But on closer inspection, it appears he is facing the camera, and leaning on the wing while standing or maybe even sitting on some kind of support that is located on the far side of the wing blocked from our view.
But the point is he is clearly not standing on the wing, so it does not really matter. | |
| |
04-18-2005, 06:25 PM
|
#58 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,778
| RG it is clearly you who is the blind one, and especially because you don't even see it when enlarged !
__________________ We have built a total of about 1250 of this aircraft (Me-262), but only fifty were allowed to be used as fighters - as interceptors. And out of this fifty, there were never more than 25 operational. So we had only a very, very few.
- Adolf Galland |
| |
04-18-2005, 07:00 PM
|
#59 | | IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 13,227
Country: |  OK guys - next week I'm going to be in California, at Mojave airport and at Gillespie Airfield for an airshow (Apr. 28-May 1). Both places are a warbird environment rich. There will definitely be a Mustang at at least one these places, maybe a Spit, possibly a P-47. Because I'll be an airshow participant, I should be able to get a real close look at these aircraft, providing they are all there. I'll take pictures and let you know what I find out.
=FBJ=
__________________ "IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT" |
| |
04-18-2005, 11:14 PM
|
#60 | | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by Soren RG it is clearly you who is the blind one, and especially because you don't even see it when enlarged ! | Soren, do you notice that there is a head right in the middle of the red circle you've drawn and marked "leg" ??? | |
| | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:00 PM. |  | |