![]() |
| |||||||
| Aviation Discussion on the aircraft of WWII. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Serbia
Posts: 421
| The Fire Hedgehog weapon Hi guys. Long time no entry I know, sorry. Was wondering. Recently I heard about the Soviet WW2 weapon known as the Fire Hedgehog-- weapon consisting of 88 machine guns which were aligned in the bomb bay of a bomber. It was used in a low level strafing mission. Any more info on it or pics??? Thanks |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Vila Real
Posts: 87
| I've never heard of such weapon but that looks quite interesting
__________________ "A room without books is like a body without soul" Confucius |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 677
| Yeah i got something see English Russia » The Fire Hedgehog Apparently this weapon consisted up 88 PPSH machine guns housed in the bomb bay of a Tu-2 bomber. If know my statstics correct the PPSH fires 900 rounds per minute therefore it would fire 79200 rounds per minute (correct me if I'm wrong). Does anybody know if this was used or not, I sure would be curious |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Herrsching,near München
Posts: 208
| During the WW2 Russian Army was using a “Fire Hedgehog” - the set of 88 Tommy-gun alike machine guns loaded into a plane. It was used at low attitude flights to effectively saw off hundreds of enemy soldiers. When the pilot got above some Nazi crowd the pilot of started fire, then the doors in the plane’s bottom were opened and this Fire Hedgehog was coming into play, eighty something non-stop firing machine guns could really look like the Hedgehog from Hell.
__________________ ![]() We shall show mercy, but we shall not ask for it. Sir Winston Churchill 1940 |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 395
| That would not be fun to run under.
__________________ Four hostile newspapers are more to be feared than a thousand bayonets. --Napoleon Bonaparte-- |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Senior Member | Holy hell! Seems like those would have been better suited in the use of the Red Army instead of an oddity like that. Would have been terrifying, though.
__________________ "I had ten rockets on board, and as I wasn't particularly fond of head-on attacks, I salvoed the whole lot at him. The rockets didn't hit him but but they must have scared the bejesus out of him, for he did a steep turn to starboard... I let him have the full blast, all eight fifty-calibers. I had never seen an aircraft completely disintegrate in the air the way this Me-110 did..." Bill Dunn, 406th Fighter Group ![]() Matt |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Banned Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,625
| Must have been a bit hard to aim.. And as for hitting infantry with it, good luck! Infantry has a habbit of scattering when a/c attack, making such a weapon completely useless... which is probably why the idea was scrapped. |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Banned Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,625
| PS: 88x900rpm = 79200 rpm = 1320 rounds pr. second!! After 4.8 seconds of firing the guns would all be empty! However after but one second of firing the a/c would suddenly be a whole lot lighter! |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 677
| Yeah. I could see the best use in groups or like attacking places where infantry were encamped. If you had a large group using that weapon, you could easily level a encampment of tents and soft targets |
| | |
| | #10 |
| "Shooter" ![]() | What a great way to aerate your lawn... |
| | |
| | #11 |
| aka Dickcheese ![]() Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Washington State
Posts: 14,008
| The US Army Air Corps did a trial with basically the same concept in the late 20s/early 30s. They used a total of 50, ten rows of five, M1928 Thompsons (drum magazines, and with all the wood furniture to boot!) mounted in the belly of (believe it or not!) a Ford Tri-Motor, firing downwards at varying angles, both fore-and-aft and side-to-side, to cover a large patch of ground with each pass. Nothing much came of it, since the effective range of a .45ACP round is MUCH less than the effective range of, oh let's just say....just about everything intended for AA use? The basic idea was for the plane to fly along above the trench line and fire downward, spraying 2,500 rounds of .45ACP in mere seconds, scything away dozens, if not hundreds, of soldiers with each pass. The actual firing tests revealed that the aircraft was basically a sitting duck due to its slow speed, but going faster just made the whole thing less effective. Plus, it was pretty much impossible to reload the Tommies given the way they were mounted. One of the little individual chutes for ejecting the spent brass from the plane (one per gun), an INTERESTING little piece of metalwork, went up on eBay about 2 years ago. The last bid I saw on it was solidly in the $1,500 range.
__________________ "Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they made a difference in the world. But, the [U.S.] Marines don't have that problem." -- Ronald Reagan Master of Duplicate Posts |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Serbia
Posts: 421
| Thanks guys |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Phila, Pa
Posts: 3,820
| On a somewhat related note, the Austrilians used to line up a load of Vickers .303 machine guns (something like 30 to 50 of them) and fire them at a target like artillery. Used to do it during the New Guinea Campaigne. Those that saw it operate said it was awesome. Just belt fed, water cooled machine guns firing away for 10 minutes. |
| | |
| | #14 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: FL
Posts: 3,529
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #15 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Phila, Pa
Posts: 3,820
| Quote:
I read it a long time ago but I am pretty sure it is in this book. Amazon.com: Touched with Fire: The Land War in the South Pacific: Eric M. Bergerud: Books Great book. All the books by Bergerud are excellent. The guy does his homework, writes well and aknowledges when he has made a mistake (as he did to some extent with this book). There is also a book called "Fire in the Sky" about the air battles in the SouthWest Pacific and Solomons in the Earlier parts of the Pacific war. Great reads. | |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |