Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums

Fixed tail gun in an He-111

Aviation Discuss Fixed tail gun in an He-111 in the World War II - Aviation forums; Can someone give me more information on this. Thanks!...


Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > World War II - Aviation > Aviation

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 04-01-2008, 06:30 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
B-17engineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Tewksbury, New Jersey
Posts: 1,368
Country:
Fixed tail gun in an He-111

Can someone give me more information on this. Thanks!
B-17engineer is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2008, 07:08 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Flyboy2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 293
Country:
The tail gun was a sometimes included modification in the He-111H-3 varient and onwards. It was not manned but was fired by one of the crew members, I think it was the person who manned the lower gondola. It was not extremely effective from what I gather but since it wasn't very visible it was sure scare the you know what out of any pilot approaching from the tail. It looks like an attempt to make the vulnerable He-111 a little less vulnerable.
Flyboy2 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2008, 09:00 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
magnocain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 373
Country:
I think it would have been a good idea to equip some fighters with such a tail machine gun, it would have been useful.
__________________
Four hostile newspapers are more to be feared than a thousand bayonets.
--Napoleon Bonaparte--
magnocain is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2008, 12:58 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 181
The Ar-234B had a pair of fixed rearward-firing 20 millimeter MG-151/20 cannon for protecting its tail, with the pilot sighting the guns through the periscope.
Arado Ar 234 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Grampa is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2008, 07:30 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Flyboy2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 293
Country:
I think it would have been pretty hard to use a fighter tail gun. Because most dog fights where turning fights, the shots would have been very hard to make because the bullets would have flew wide. Would have been useful for formation flying.
Flyboy2 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2008, 08:20 PM   #6
Moderator
 
Micdrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 2,897
Country:
He 111 tail weapon install from book squadron signal He-111 in action.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 111.jpg (56.4 KB, 86 views)
__________________

"Valor does not mean Hero."
Micdrow is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2008, 08:45 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
magnocain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 373
Country:
Quote:
I think it would have been pretty hard to use a fighter tail gun. Because most dog fights where turning fights, the shots would have been very hard to make because the bullets would have flew wide. Would have been useful for formation flying.
Not to shoot down enemy planes as to scare them and straft overflown ground targets.
__________________
Four hostile newspapers are more to be feared than a thousand bayonets.
--Napoleon Bonaparte--
magnocain is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2008, 04:16 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
Heinz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 4,642
Country:
Thanks for the shot Micdrow!
__________________
Heinz is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2008, 05:07 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
B-17engineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Tewksbury, New Jersey
Posts: 1,368
Country:
Thanks guys and great Pic Micdrow
B-17engineer is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2008, 06:21 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
Flyboy2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 293
Country:
Sure clears up alot of confusion
Flyboy2 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2008, 03:29 PM   #11
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 4
Country:
I think that the tail gun on some Heinkels was fired by the pilot and he had a rear view mirror to sight it - just like on a car.
Some Heinkels had a grenade launcher in the tail.
Keith T
Keith T is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2008, 06:26 PM   #12
Moderator
 
Micdrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 2,897
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith T View Post
I think that the tail gun on some Heinkels was fired by the pilot and he had a rear view mirror to sight it - just like on a car.
Some Heinkels had a grenade launcher in the tail.
Keith T
Ive never heard of this configuration that I can think off. Any body have any more info on the grenade launcher version. How many grenade's where carried or any pictures of it installed.
__________________

"Valor does not mean Hero."
Micdrow is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2008, 10:33 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
Flyboy2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 293
Country:
Umm.... wouldn't that be really dangerous to be firing a gernade launcher in a bomber formation. The gernades what have to have really short fuses to ensure the didn't blow up farther back in the formation and wouldn't there also be danger from the gernade shrapnel damaging the plane it was shot from?
Are you sure it was a gernade launcher?
Flyboy2 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2008, 02:53 AM   #14
Senior Member
 
kool kitty89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,238
Country:
One thing to note is that the LW bomber formations in the BoB were much looser than those of the USAAF's bomber boxes. But FB2's point still stands.

And I'd be skeptical of this too.
kool kitty89 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2008, 07:50 PM   #15
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 114
Country:
I never heard of a rear firing grenade lauchcher, too. The Luftwaffe did some unseccessful experiments with rear firing flamethrowers but AFAIR only in Do 17.
Denniss is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
   

AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com Avitop.com


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93