![]() |
| |||||||
| Aviation Discussion on the aircraft of WWII. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Senior Member | Fixed tail gun in an He-111 Can someone give me more information on this. Thanks! |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 677
| The tail gun was a sometimes included modification in the He-111H-3 varient and onwards. It was not manned but was fired by one of the crew members, I think it was the person who manned the lower gondola. It was not extremely effective from what I gather but since it wasn't very visible it was sure scare the you know what out of any pilot approaching from the tail. It looks like an attempt to make the vulnerable He-111 a little less vulnerable. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 395
| I think it would have been a good idea to equip some fighters with such a tail machine gun, it would have been useful.
__________________ Four hostile newspapers are more to be feared than a thousand bayonets. --Napoleon Bonaparte-- |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 216
| The Ar-234B had a pair of fixed rearward-firing 20 millimeter MG-151/20 cannon for protecting its tail, with the pilot sighting the guns through the periscope. Arado Ar 234 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 677
| I think it would have been pretty hard to use a fighter tail gun. Because most dog fights where turning fights, the shots would have been very hard to make because the bullets would have flew wide. Would have been useful for formation flying. |
| | |
| | #6 |
| “Archive” ![]() Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 5,222
| He 111 tail weapon install from book squadron signal He-111 in action.
__________________ ![]() "Valor does not mean Hero." |
| | |
| | #7 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 395
| Quote:
__________________ Four hostile newspapers are more to be feared than a thousand bayonets. --Napoleon Bonaparte-- | |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 7,678
| Thanks for the shot Micdrow!
__________________ |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Senior Member | Thanks guys and great Pic Micdrow |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 677
| Sure clears up alot of confusion |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 4
| I think that the tail gun on some Heinkels was fired by the pilot and he had a rear view mirror to sight it - just like on a car. Some Heinkels had a grenade launcher in the tail. Keith T |
| | |
| | #12 |
| “Archive” ![]() Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 5,222
| Ive never heard of this configuration that I can think off. Any body have any more info on the grenade launcher version. How many grenade's where carried or any pictures of it installed.
__________________ ![]() "Valor does not mean Hero." |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 677
| Umm.... wouldn't that be really dangerous to be firing a gernade launcher in a bomber formation. The gernades what have to have really short fuses to ensure the didn't blow up farther back in the formation and wouldn't there also be danger from the gernade shrapnel damaging the plane it was shot from? Are you sure it was a gernade launcher? |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,412
| One thing to note is that the LW bomber formations in the BoB were much looser than those of the USAAF's bomber boxes. But FB2's point still stands. And I'd be skeptical of this too. |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 117
| I never heard of a rear firing grenade lauchcher, too. The Luftwaffe did some unseccessful experiments with rear firing flamethrowers but AFAIR only in Do 17. |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |