ADS NOT DISPLAYED TO REGISTERED USERS.
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 20

Flying the Messerschmitt Bf-109E - by Rob Erdos, Vintage Wings of Canada

Aviation Discuss Flying the Messerschmitt Bf-109E - by Rob Erdos, Vintage Wings of Canada in the World War II - Aviation forums; Found this article this morning. Very interesting and enlightening. Photos are great too. Bouncing Clouds...

  1. #1
    Senior Member claidemore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    British Columbia, Canada
    Posts
    683
    Country
    Canada

    Flying the Messerschmitt Bf-109E - by Rob Erdos, Vintage Wings of Canada

    Found this article this morning. Very interesting and enlightening. Photos are great too.



    Bouncing Clouds
    The trouble with most people isn't what they don't know....it's what they do know that simply isn't so.

  2. #2
    Senior Member comiso90's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    3,672
    Country
    United States
    Cool.. thats PBFoots guy...

    Is that the one who clipped a telephone line recently and almost destroyed an original BF 109?

  3. #3
    Senior Member pbfoot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    niagara falls
    Posts
    7,635
    Country
    Canada
    Quote Originally Posted by comiso90 View Post
    Cool.. thats PBFoots guy...

    Is that the one who clipped a telephone line recently and almost destroyed an original BF 109?
    Nope guy fills in occasionally

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    London
    Posts
    5,435
    Probably the best description I have read on what its like to fly a 109.

    Many Thanks

  5. #5
    Senior Member diddyriddick's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Hamlet, NC, US
    Posts
    1,391
    Country
    United States
    Very cool! Thanks, claidemore!

  6. #6
    Senior Member BikerBabe's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Denmark.
    Posts
    3,197
    Country
    Denmark
    Neat, thanks for sharing.
    And there's a few other very interesting reads on that site:

    "After the fact - the benefit of a post-flight walkaround"
    "Checking Out - flying the vintage single-seaters"
    "A Boy in a Hurricane - Fulfilling a Dream"
    "Moving Up by the Wartime Route - Becoming a Spitfire pilot"
    "Glorious Fun - Flying the WACO Taperwing"
    "Hurricane Season - Flying the Hawker Hurricane"
    "The Harvard Graduate - first solo in the Harvard"
    "Goodnight Sweetheart - the last flight of a WACO biplane"
    "Flying the Spitfire with Mike Potter"
    "Flying the Tiger Moth with Dave Hadfield"
    "Flying the Mustang with Tim Leslie"
    "Flying the Hurricane with Rob Erdos"
    "Flying the Fox Moth with Dave Hadfield"
    "How not to Ground Loop a Harvard"
    "Flying the Corsair with Doug Matthews"
    "Nimrod: The Mighty Hunter - flying the Hawker Nimrod Biplane Fighter"
    "On Yellow Wings - flying the Tiger Moth"

    Time to sign up for yet another newsletter, methinks.


    "Ich bitte um Ausrüstung meines Geschwaders mit Spitfires." Adolf Galland, "Die Ersten und die Letzten".


  7. #7
    Senior Member gumbyk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Blenheim
    Posts
    759
    Country
    New Zealand
    Thanks Claidemore,
    very interesting read

  8. #8
    Banned Soren's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    6,625
    I find Mark Hanna & Skip Holm's accounts more enlightening, and also more accurate given their much longer flying time in the a/c. According to both it is easy to do a 5 G pullout at 500 km/h with ONE hand. Only difference is they fly (flew in the case of Hanna) the Bf-109G and not the Emil like this guy.

    Mark Hanna:
    http://findarticles.com/p/articles/m...2/ai_n8870616/

    Skip Holm:
    http://www.skipholm.com/willy-messerschmitt.htm
    Last edited by Soren; 01-14-2010 at 05:29 PM.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Phila, Pa
    Posts
    4,443
    Country
    United States
    That is amazing that the 109E was so tough to get out of a power dive. 3.5G pullout using both hands? Sheesh.

  10. #10
    Banned Soren's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    6,625
    I'm just trying to figure out what difference between the later variants and the Emil made them so much easier to pull out of a dive than the Emil.

  11. #11
    Senior Member claidemore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    British Columbia, Canada
    Posts
    683
    Country
    Canada
    Quote Originally Posted by Soren View Post
    I find Mark Hanna & Skip Holm's accounts more enlightening, and also more accurate given their much longer flying time in the a/c. According to both it is easy to do a 5 G pullout at 500 km/h with ONE hand. Only difference is they fly (flew in the case of Hanna) the Bf-109G and not the Emil like this guy.

    Mark Hanna:
    Flying the Bf 109: Two experts give their reports | Flight Journal | Find Articles at BNET

    Skip Holm:
    Skip Holm
    I don't really think the later variants were easier to pull out of a dive Soren. It's just 3 different impressions of flying it, and our interpretation of those impressions.

    From Skip Holm:
    The roll rate is very good and very positive at 250 mph. Above 250 mph the ailerons get heavy and at 300 they are very similar to a P-51. Any speed after that results in the ailerons getting fairly solid and you need two hands on the stick for any meaningful roll rates.
    Pitch force tends to get heavy at speeds above 300 mph, but is still easily managed with a little 2-hand pull or left hand re-trimming.
    From Mark Hanna:
    When you maneuver above 500km/h, two hands are required for a more aggressive performance. Either that or get on the trimmer to help. Despite this heavying up, it is still quite easy to get 5G at these speeds.
    If you combine Holms' 2nd quote and Hannas' quote, you might conclude a 5G ONE hand pullout, but that's a pretty liberal interpretation. All three pilots talk about having to use 2 hands though. Historic accounts talk about the 109s good aerobatic qualities at lower speeds, my impression was always that the controls got extremely heavy at higher speeds than these guys would ever push one of those valuable and rare planes.
    The trouble with most people isn't what they don't know....it's what they do know that simply isn't so.

  12. #12
    Banned Soren's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    6,625
    Well there are several things which strike me as odd about his story, esp. his claim that speed dropped at an unusually high rate when the slats popped out, which he claims is because the slats add a lot of extra drag. In reality however the slats don't really add any extra drag at all, not anymore than the increase in wing area they represent causes atleast (which means very little to none at all). In turn they increase the Clmax by 25%, which causes an increase in induced drag, which is the only form of drag which is increased as it closely follows the production of lift. And that is what makes automatic slats such ingenious devices and the reason they were put on virtually all fighters after the war. So the drop in speed he was experiencing probably had something to do with the problems he had managing the engine & prop. Also comparing it to the much more power Spitfire IX is abit odd.

  13. #13
    Senior Member pbfoot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    niagara falls
    Posts
    7,635
    Country
    Canada
    "Rob Erdos is an experimental test pilot and graduate of the US Naval Test Piloting School. He has a degree in Mechanical Engineering, and holds both fixed-wing and helicopter Air Transport Licences. He recieved his wings in the Canadian Air Force, and flew operationally as a Search and Rescue Pilot, followed by a tour as an engineer test pilot with the Aerospace Engineering Test Establishment, in Cold Lake, Alberta. He is now with the Flight Research Laboratory of the National Research Council of Canada, and is engaged in research flight testing in handling qualities, performance and airborne systems. He is interested in homebuilt and sport aircraft"

    I believe him more then your book "learning" Soren I watched the whole flight evolve from the briefing to debriefing but unlike yourself I listen as opposed to pretending to know > thats how you learn

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    London
    Posts
    5,435
    The problem seems to have been if you let the speed drop too far. Hanna made a similar point
    The '109 is one of the most controllable aircraft that I have flown at slow speed around finals, and provided you don't get too slow is one of the easiest to three point. It just feels right ! The only problem is getting it too slow. If this happens you end up with a very high sink rate, very quickly and absolutely no ability to check or flare to round out. It literally falls out of your hands !

    If you abuse any aircraft then it will bite you.

    An almost uncontrolled sink rate on landing is a horrible feeling.
    Last edited by Glider; 01-15-2010 at 04:39 PM.

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Phila, Pa
    Posts
    4,443
    Country
    United States
    Quote Originally Posted by Soren View Post
    I'm just trying to figure out what difference between the later variants and the Emil made them so much easier to pull out of a dive than the Emil.
    Good question. The tail was redesigned some after the E. F through K had one without the struts. Must've been some work done to make the elevators more effective across the board.

    Anybody have an overhead shot of the tails of the E and later variants that they can post?

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91