![]() |
| | #1 |
| Member Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 42
| FW 200 Condor Need good pictures or videos of the Condor I couldnt find to may on search engines. Any interesting facts always wanted. Also did it ever srafe targets? Pictures or videos if you can Thanks |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: London Ontario Canada
Posts: 284
| There is a new book coming out very soon on it. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 648
| ![]() ![]() ![]() Try this video YouTube - Focke Wulf FW200 Condor anti-shipping bomber in action Hey by the way, found your post on defense talk... I think that the Condor could carry a torp |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 1,893
| I wonder why the FW 200 condor wasn't used during the Battle of Britain. Did it not operate well at high altitudes?
__________________ ![]() "His motor's conked out!" "What's the differance, they're all Nazis!" "Luke, shut up!" "Fear the hook!" "Oh.....I wanna fly." "You mean the kind that go under water and fly up the stairs?" "What you doing? Oh Nooooo!" |
| | |
| | #5 |
| the old Sage ![]() Join Date: May 2004 Location: Platonic Sphere
Posts: 10,773
| the book has already been published via Ian Allan/Classic Publications go pick up a copy, also a couple of you tube vids are in place for your enjoyment as well check old book dealers for other books on the big K, use amazon it is your friend
__________________ Rip it up ! |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 648
| That might be it, but it also might be because it was primarily designed for maritime duties. It also may not have had a very good net effectiveness. I mean this by that the Fw-200 could carry 3,000kg of bombs while much smaller aircraft such as the Ju-88 and He-111 could carry 3,600kg (overload) and 2,500kg respectively. It may not have been as cost effective to use a four engined bomber that could carry almost as much as two engined bombers could. Just a theory, maybe some more knowledgable people can chime in. |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Member Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 42
| Thanks Everybody, and that video helped to clear everything up. Flyboy thanks for the torpedo answer. |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Senior Member | Here is a nice little book: Aircraft Profile 099 - Focke Wulf Fw 200 Condor Youtube has some really nice videos on it.
__________________ "Those who forget the past are condemned to repeat it" "Those who dwell in the past, condemn the future" ![]() Last edited by vikingBerserker; 05-28-2009 at 12:20 AM. |
| | |
| | #9 |
| the old Sage ![]() Join Date: May 2004 Location: Platonic Sphere
Posts: 10,773
| it could NOT carry a torpedo by the way. the unit KG 40 bombed shipping as well as strafed as much of the decking of Allied ships as possible once it flew over the intended target to keep the AA gunners down if at all possible. also it was a rarity to see two Kondors anywhere close to one another in flight or on the attack, primarily if at all possible to fly out of the sun low or even low over the white caps in foul weather you best bet for answers is focus on composing a library and not depend on the net.
__________________ Rip it up ! |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Senior Member | ![]() ![]() ![]() Never heard of them carrying a standard topedo, only bombs, mines, and missles. I'd heard of some tests on special guided torpedos (Henschel IIRC) - not sure if that what being thought of.
__________________ "Those who forget the past are condemned to repeat it" "Those who dwell in the past, condemn the future" ![]() |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Adelaide
Posts: 510
| "The scourge of the Atlantic" I imagine a convoy would of shat themselves when they saw a Condor above!
__________________ |
| | |
| | #12 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,081
| Quote:
Some artwork by Mike Bradrocke for AE No.67. From top to bottom; 200C-3 200C-4 200C-4/U1-U2 200C-4/U3 200C-6 200C-8/U10. | |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,224
| Fantastic info guys! |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Hannover, Germany and/or Manila, Philippines
Posts: 66
| FYI in post #10 the first photo does not depict a Fw 200 C, but a Ju 290 A.
__________________ Regards Christian M. Aguilar |
| | |
| | #15 |
| The Pop-Tart Whisperer ![]() Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: South Jersey, United States
Posts: 10,228
| Everybody beat me to it!! I would venture a guess that at the time of BoB, the Luftwaffe still wasn't convinced about using heavy bombers w/ 4 engines. RIP General Wever.
__________________ ![]() "If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it's English, thank a soldier!" http://www.njcacoa.org/ |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |