Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums

German mystery fighter?

Aviation Discuss German mystery fighter? in the World War II - Aviation forums; And wrong I was. LEMB is back online. I could easily edit my previous post but what the heck... I'...


Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > World War II - Aviation > Aviation

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 03-07-2007, 12:45 PM   #16
Senior Member
 
Civettone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Limburg
Posts: 871
Country:
Send a message via MSN to Civettone Send a message via Skype™ to Civettone
And wrong I was. LEMB is back online. I could easily edit my previous post but what the heck... I'm so delighted it's back!!

So anyway, about the discussions. If anyone likes to spend an evening reading through it. You'll have to register and login to see it though.
An alternative is to look at it through the google cache. Try this:
"mystery plane" "DB 604" - Google Search

Btw Soren, good call on the He 280. The resemblance was extensively discussed in that thread.

Kris
__________________

Civettone is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2007, 01:59 PM   #17
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 12
Country:
The link thing doesn't work, but no problem, then I'll register.

yeah, the db 604 is possible. I looked at some prototype drawings of other planes, and proposals with jumo 222, 223 and 224 engines, and the argus 413 had a similar exhaust lay out, so these are also possible.

A heinkel 280 is possible. Very possible
the v form in the wings, the tricycle undercarrige, the twin fin.

What if the Germans did the same with the He-280 as the Americans did with the first bell jet?

Heinkels engines weren't available yet. So he couldn't mount them on the plane. Except for that, the first prototypes were ready. Maybe they rolled it out, put some scrap on it to disguise it as some sort of otto fighter prototype and left it waiting for engines, test flight, whatever...
Glue some wood on the nose, bring a fake canopy forward, put on an prop and it looks completely different.

I'am just speculating, maybe the undercarrige isn't the same, or are the fins different or so.

Tom
W@CC0 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2007, 07:09 PM   #18
Senior Member
 
davparlr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,100
Country:
I don't know what the previous thread said about the pictures but I made a few measurement estimates. If the healthy German standing beside the aircraft is about 5'10", then the wingspan is about 28' and the propeller diameter is about 10'8". Then, since the man comes up to the thrust line of aircraft, I used this as a reference in other picture. That gives a length of about 36' (but I couldn't see the tail end of the plane and the picture is a bit skewed). Also I noted that the aircraft has low wing installation. The following is a comparison to the He-280:

The aircraft in the picture is smaller than the He-280, which has a wingspan of 39'4", and a length of 34'1.5" (close here). Also, the aircraft sit higher than the He-280 on longer gear (this would be expected of a propeller aircraft). There certainly is some error possibility in measurements. A more telling configuration is that the He-280 is a low mid-wing installation whereas the aircraft shown is not. The tail design is very similar and the wing design with with no dihedral for the inner most portion but with a slight dihedral outboard is very similar. Overall, I do not think this is a He-280 aircraft or one that is modifed, mainly due to the wing installation although the dimensions are also important.

A couple of confusion issues here is, first, the aircraft length is greater than the wingspan, an unsusal configuration for a WWII aircraft, certainly a propeller driven plane (the He-162 did have this design). Second, in order to harness the increased power, the propeller diameter of Allied aircraft with engines of similar HP as the Db 604 (2500+hp), had much larger propeller diameters (as much a 14'). I know German propeller were very efficient, but I doubt that they were that much more efficient.

So, I guess the question goes on.
davparlr is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2007, 10:24 PM   #19
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Queensland
Posts: 1,246
Country:
Certainly an interesting plane. Looks like an early prototype for the Pfiel without the back propellor to me...
HealzDevo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2008, 07:10 PM   #20
Senior Member
 
kool kitty89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,483
Country:
The cockpit was also too far foreward to be the 280...

A better comparison here: LuftArchiv.de - Das Archiv der Deutschen Luftwaffe

From what I've read, the He 280 was tested as a glider with no engines but with engine-shaped balasts fitted in place engines.

Last edited by kool kitty89 : 02-08-2008 at 07:13 PM.
kool kitty89 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2008, 03:37 AM   #21
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 747
Country:
Hi Koolkitty,

>The cockpit was also too far foreward to be the 280...

In my opinion, it's a frankensteined and photoshopped Heinkel He 280 kit.

Look at the landing gear for example ... it's exactly the same as on the He 280, but in the He 280 the main wheels retract into the fuselage though this is not possible here due to the fake being a low-wing aircraft. Still, no extended gear cover, no wheel well doors ...

Regards,

Henning (HoHun)
HoHun is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2008, 05:40 AM   #22
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Berlin (Kreuzberg)
Posts: 1,479
Perhaps this is more a decoy aircraft installation? Kind of an attrappe rather than an flying testbed?
__________________
---delcyros---
delcyros is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2008, 10:01 AM   #23
Senior Member
 
Elvis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 359
Country:
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by DerAdlerIstGelandet View Post
Well if it is so, then it is a very well done fake.
Look closely at the upper right side propeller blade in the head-on shot.
Looks pretty "tacked on" to me.
The upper photo (port side rear 3/4 shot) is quite convincing though.

Not saying for sure what it is, but I wouldn't dismiss the photoshop theory, either.

...and speaking of theory's, has anyone thought about this?

Assuming for the moment that the photos are real, anyone think the prop could be a fake, to throw off spies or shun any thoughts that its a jet?
We did this very thing with the Bell XP-59.




Elvis

Last edited by Elvis : 02-17-2008 at 10:05 AM.
Elvis is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2008, 03:30 PM   #24
Senior Member
 
Soren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,281
Being skeptical is always the easiest.

Personally I'm very unsure as to wether it's real or not, I mean it would be a masterpiece of photoshopping if it was fake, cause frankly I can't see anything fake'ish about the picture at all.

The cockpit looks like the same as used for the He-280, however the rest looks different. Could very well be an unknown LW a/c which got lost in the war.

In short I'm puzzled really..
__________________

We have built a total of about 1250 of this aircraft (Me-262), but only fifty were allowed to be used as fighters - as interceptors. And out of this fifty, there were never more than 25 operational. So we had only a very, very few.
- Adolf Galland
Soren is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2008, 04:12 AM   #25
A4K
Senior Member
 
A4K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,528
Country:
The engine arrangement is reminiscent of the messerschmitt Me 155 -the project started in the Bf 109H series, and ending up as the Blohm und Voss Bv155 aircraft
The fueslage and tail arrangement really do resemble the He 280, though.
A4K is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2008, 07:03 AM   #26
Senior Member
 
Elvis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 359
Country:
Smile

You mean this one?

Elvis is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2008, 08:30 AM   #27
A4K
Senior Member
 
A4K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,528
Country:
Sure do, my friend

Interesting looking beast, only 3 made by war's end (one of which is at Silver Hill awaiting restoration)

The Bv 155V-1 was completed and flown, but was written-off following a crash in the hands of a British pilot.
A4K is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2008, 07:43 PM   #28
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 175
Country:
I looked here:
Luft '46 - WWII German aircraft projects

but couldn't find anything similar to the OP pics.

tom
__________________
The problem with neighborhoods these days is not enough neighbors and too many hoods.
machine shop tom is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2008, 09:14 PM   #29
Senior Member
 
Soren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,281
Take a look at those unusually large supercharger inlets on the BV-155, big yes, but for a purpose. This a/c had an amazing service ceiling of 17km (55,774 ft), a good 5km higher than any Allied a/c and 1.9km higher than the Ta-152H-1.

Yet another a/c at the pinnacle of piston engine a/c designs, a no less than amazing a/c.

__________________

We have built a total of about 1250 of this aircraft (Me-262), but only fifty were allowed to be used as fighters - as interceptors. And out of this fifty, there were never more than 25 operational. So we had only a very, very few.
- Adolf Galland

Last edited by Soren : 02-18-2008 at 09:18 PM.
Soren is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2008, 09:26 PM   #30
Senior Member
 
Soren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,281
Another picture.

__________________

We have built a total of about 1250 of this aircraft (Me-262), but only fifty were allowed to be used as fighters - as interceptors. And out of this fifty, there were never more than 25 operational. So we had only a very, very few.
- Adolf Galland
Soren is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
   

AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com Avitop.com


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83