Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums
 



Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > World War II - Aviation > Aviation

Aviation Discussion on the aircraft of WWII.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-18-2008, 08:41 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
machine shop tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 265
A German Oscar?

Ran across this while surfing:

Me-109X

http://www.xs4all.nl/~tozu/me109/fam...es/aj3-v21.jpg

Put some meatballs on it and it looks like an Oscar.

http://www.juniorgeneral.org/donated/john/oscar.GIF


tom
__________________
The First Amendment is indefensible without the Second Amendment.

Last edited by machine shop tom; 02-19-2008 at 10:40 PM. Reason: added urls
machine shop tom is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2008, 09:07 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Thorlifter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 4,346
Wow, it kinda does.
__________________
Thorlifter is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2008, 09:14 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
B-17engineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 5,689
Send a message via AIM to B-17engineer
Wow, That does look like it. Could Germany bought some and then re-named it? Also, added a DIfferent engine?
B-17engineer is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2008, 09:14 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Soren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,116
Just a MT prototype, not meant to be a copy of the Oscar but a 109 with a radial instead of inline engine.
__________________

It was like being pushed by an Angel!
- Adolf Galland

I'm an educated engineer, so I love being technical and appraising of great inventions. So if you think I am being biased about something: Tell me! Then you'll probably find out that I am not
Soren is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2008, 09:16 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
B-17engineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 5,689
Send a message via AIM to B-17engineer
OK gotcha
B-17engineer is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2008, 09:18 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
machine shop tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 265
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soren View Post
Just a MT prototype, not meant to be a copy of the Oscar but a 109 with a radial instead of inline engine.
Right. A case of coincidental parallel development. Interesting how the Japanese eschewed the in-line (with a few exceptions) while the Germans thumbed their nose (for the most part) at radials.

tom
__________________
The First Amendment is indefensible without the Second Amendment.
machine shop tom is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2008, 09:31 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
magnocain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 394
Like this

and this
__________________
Four hostile newspapers are more to be feared than a thousand bayonets.
--Napoleon Bonaparte--
magnocain is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2008, 01:00 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
claidemore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 497
Interesting thing; the canopy. Bubble type, all around vision, why didn't they put that on the inline Me109's? Obviously they could make it work on the radial prototype, what stopped them from switching the production 109s?

Also, no struts on the stabilizers. So is that photo the 1938 V-21 or the 1941 based on an F1 airframe?

I wonder what happened to the Japanese attaches in Berlin after Germany surrendered?
claidemore is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2008, 01:53 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Medford, MA
Posts: 108
Send a message via MSN to Evil_Merlin
Quote:
Originally Posted by magnocain View Post
Like this
Blech! The Nakajima J9Y Kikka.

Believe it or not it really wasn't directly based on the Me-262. The Kikka was smaller had much more simple wings and tail surfaces, and more importantly actually seemed to fly a bit better than the early Me-262 prototypes.

The Japanese actually built their turbojet, the Ishikawajima Ne-20, based off of German cut-away drawings and photographs. The engine they built was actually found to be more reliable than the BMW 003 it was a copy of according to testing done by the Americans following the war.
Evil_Merlin is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2008, 01:56 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Medford, MA
Posts: 108
Send a message via MSN to Evil_Merlin
Quote:
Originally Posted by claidemore View Post
Interesting thing; the canopy. Bubble type, all around vision, why didn't they put that on the inline Me109's? Obviously they could make it work on the radial prototype, what stopped them from switching the production 109s?

Also, no struts on the stabilizers. So is that photo the 1938 V-21 or the 1941 based on an F1 airframe?
I don't think so, it still has the flaps of the E models. The F-1 started with the two piece flaps if I'm not mistaken.
Evil_Merlin is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2008, 08:47 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
magnocain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 394
Quote:
Believe it or not it really wasn't directly based on the Me-262.
Like the "independent" and "not at all influenced by each other" American and Russian space shuttles?
__________________
Four hostile newspapers are more to be feared than a thousand bayonets.
--Napoleon Bonaparte--
magnocain is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2008, 10:01 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
Soren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,116
Quote:
Originally Posted by claidemore View Post
Interesting thing; the canopy. Bubble type, all around vision, why didn't they put that on the inline Me109's? Obviously they could make it work on the radial prototype, what stopped them from switching the production 109s?
The reason they didn't shift to the bubble canopy is because it increases drag and therefore negatively affects the speed of the a/c. Als the vision with the modified Galland hood canopy was good enough.

Quote:
Also, no struts on the stabilizers. So is that photo the 1938 V-21 or the 1941 based on an F1 airframe?
Only the Emil had these struts, all the later 109's had no struts on the stabilizers.
__________________

It was like being pushed by an Angel!
- Adolf Galland

I'm an educated engineer, so I love being technical and appraising of great inventions. So if you think I am being biased about something: Tell me! Then you'll probably find out that I am not
Soren is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2008, 12:07 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Medford, MA
Posts: 108
Send a message via MSN to Evil_Merlin
Quote:
Originally Posted by magnocain View Post
Like the "independent" and "not at all influenced by each other" American and Russian space shuttles?
Nope, the Kikka was a totally different bird with very little in common with the Me-262.
Evil_Merlin is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2008, 09:25 PM   #14
Senior Member
 
Kiwikid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Posts: 140
The Kika was smaller and used Italian jet engines. Japan did have a larger army copy of the Me-262, but as far as is known, no Jumo jet engines made it to Japan by U-boat, or at least not in time.

There are disputed claims that an Me 262 was in the cargo of U-234 however 70 tons of her cargo remain classified to this day (discrepancy between German manifest at Keil and USN manifest at New Hampshire).
Kiwikid is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2008, 09:27 PM   #15
Senior Member
 
Soren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,116
Quote:
Originally Posted by Evil_Merlin View Post
The engine they built was actually found to be more reliable than the BMW 003 it was a copy of according to testing done by the Americans following the war.
Considering its abysmal performance that isn't surprising. The BMW-003 did after-all produce 40-45% more power and on top of that weighed less.
__________________

It was like being pushed by an Angel!
- Adolf Galland

I'm an educated engineer, so I love being technical and appraising of great inventions. So if you think I am being biased about something: Tell me! Then you'll probably find out that I am not
Soren is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:26 AM.
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Ad Management plugin by RedTyger
Design by HTWoRKS


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118