 | The Germans won WWII........| Aviation Discuss The Germans won WWII........ in the World War II - Aviation forums; ....competition to field the best fighter aircraft. At least thats the opinion among you guys.
That the Germans won the ... |
|
04-07-2006, 04:20 AM
|
#1 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 1,515
Country: | The Germans won WWII........ ....competition to field the best fighter aircraft. At least thats the opinion among you guys.
That the Germans won the title of best aircraft in both World Wars, gives just an example why german products are so trusted even today.
The German Fokker D.VII is considered the best fighter of WWI.
The German Focke-Wulf FW 109D and the far less widely used Focke-Wulf Ta 152 are considered the best fighters of WWII.
And these are just the Prop-driven aircraft! Still, I think most WWII aviation fans would list the Messerschmitt Me 262 as superior to the Gloster Meteor.
The lucky buggers! Even though they lost both wars.
Last edited by Soundbreaker Welch? : 04-07-2006 at 04:35 AM.
|
| |
04-07-2006, 04:36 AM
|
#2 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,954
| Quantity has a quality of its own.
__________________ We have built a total of about 1250 of this aircraft (Me-262), but only fifty were allowed to be used as fighters - as interceptors. And out of this fifty, there were never more than 25 operational. So we had only a very, very few.
- Adolf Galland |
| |
04-07-2006, 06:35 AM
|
#3 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Londonium
Posts: 610
| They may have been the best, but not by a great enough margin to counteract the quantity of the allies.
A quality aircraft design doesn't count for much if it's flown by someone inexperienced, doesn't have enough fuel to run, has trouble taking off without being destroyed on the ground and is made by slaves trying to sabotage them. Add to that the allied aircraft that were right up there in quality with, by wars end, much better trained pilots and many more of them and it's game over for the Germans, they sure didn't make it easy though.
__________________ Never mistake knowledge for wisdom. One helps you make a living; the other helps you make a life. |
| |
04-07-2006, 11:30 AM
|
#4 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 8,446
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by Soren Quantity has a quality of its own. | Right on!!!!!!
__________________ "Pilot to copilot..... what are those mountain goats doing up here in the clouds?" |
| |
04-07-2006, 11:33 AM
|
#5 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: City of the Angels California
Posts: 810
| Thge fact is that the 262 was not being flown by green pilots. Schwalbe staffels were filled by combat hardened men that knew what the hell was going on. It's an Allied propagated myth that jets were flown by newbies.
But the juggernaut of victory wouldn't have been halted, only slowed no matter what the Germans did.
__________________ |
| |
04-07-2006, 08:29 PM
|
#6 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: George - South Africa
Posts: 2,655
Country: | Yes, I agree with you Twitch, the Me-262 pilots were not pilots like they say in history books or even on TV, yes there were some of them, but not the numbers they say. The Heinkel 162 did not have experienced pilots.
I agree, the Germans did have great aircraft, and yes if they show you the produck is from Germany it is quality.
Henk
__________________
The ultimate revolution in aircraft designs during WW2 |
| |
04-07-2006, 08:42 PM
|
#7 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 681
| As a pure dogfighter, my vote goes to the Spit Mk. XIV.
By the end of 1943, the Jerries only had to field very short range fighters as they were playing pure defense. The allies had to field long range planes as escorts and just to get to Berlin. There's no free lunch. That capacity for long range came at an expense.
Now, had the Jerries needed longer range fighters to prosecute the war on offense, those same aircraft would have been totally unsuitable.
Hell, take a F4U-4, P-47M or N or even P-51D and fill em up with just enough fuel for a 550 mile range and you will see some hot ships due to the reduced weight.
Last edited by Jank : 04-07-2006 at 08:48 PM.
|
| |
04-08-2006, 04:08 PM
|
#8 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 1,515
Country: | Well, I'm an american so it came hard to admit the germans had the best stuff by about two 3 inches above us.
But I agree the Allies had the best long range fighters. |
| |
04-08-2006, 04:44 PM
|
#9 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 8,446
| A P80 vs Me-262 matchup would be interesting.
__________________ "Pilot to copilot..... what are those mountain goats doing up here in the clouds?" |
| |
04-08-2006, 08:37 PM
|
#10 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: NIAGARA
Posts: 4,765
Country: | i think a better match up would be the F84 which probably if push came to shove could've been rolling of the lines in early 46
__________________ |
| |
04-09-2006, 01:52 PM
|
#11 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: City of the Angels California
Posts: 810
| One thing for certain- I'm glad most people here acknowledge accomplishments where accomplisments are due regardless of the country of origin. There are forums where bigoted a$$holes just will not see beyond the Allied aircraft and weapons.
Syscom3- I do think the first P-80 model vs the 262 would have been a better match than Meteor vs Schwalbe.
__________________ |
| |
04-09-2006, 02:32 PM
|
#12 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: George - South Africa
Posts: 2,655
Country: | Quote: |
There are forums where bigoted a$$holes just will not see beyond the Allied aircraft and weapons.
| I agree with you there Twitch.
Henk
__________________
The ultimate revolution in aircraft designs during WW2 |
| |
04-10-2006, 06:40 AM
|
#13 | | Der Crewchief
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 30,198
Country: | I agree that would have interesting to see how that would have panned out. The P-80 vs the Me-262. I personally think besides engines the Me-262 had the edge on the P-80 but not by much. But then again if the war had dragged on long eneogh to see a P-80 vs Me-262 match then we would probably be discussing the P.1011 and the Ta-183 right now instead.
__________________ US Army Blackhawk Crewchief 2000-2006 Classic ww2aircraft.net quotes: fly boy said: "isn't that the first jet bomber? becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles" "wait what ok who made the b-2 crash come on people that messed up its a b-2" "ah yes the mistel those things are so annoying is games and in real life" |
| |
04-10-2006, 07:36 AM
|
#14 | | Banned
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 795
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by Twitch Thge fact is that the 262 was not being flown by green pilots. Schwalbe staffels were filled by combat hardened men that knew what the hell was going on. It's an Allied propagated myth that jets were flown by newbies.
But the juggernaut of victory wouldn't have been halted, only slowed no matter what the Germans did. | Noobs no but some had low stick time as comabt pilots. That can be seen in the errors made by some that got shot down. An experten would not have made those moves.
In the Smithsonian book on the 262 restoration there is a section with a combat trial between the 262 and a P-80. The 262 was better and the report filed away out of sight. |
| |
04-10-2006, 07:40 AM
|
#15 | | Banned
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 795
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by Henk Yes, I agree with you Twitch, the Me-262 pilots were not pilots like they say in history books or even on TV, yes there were some of them, but not the numbers they say. The Heinkel 162 did not have experienced pilots. | Myth on the 162 Henk. |
| | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:56 AM. |  | |