Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums
 



Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > World War II - Aviation > Aviation

Aviation Discussion on the aircraft of WWII.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-05-2007, 12:46 PM   #1
“Archive”
 
Micdrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 4,852
Question Hawker Hurricane XIIb

I ran into this profile and thought well maybe it was a fake. But then I found this photo of the aircraft. It looks like a normal two seater hurricane but instead of having a secondary pilot its set up for a gunner.

Question is was these used as fighter's or where they used for ground attack aircraft with a rear gunner?

Thanks in advance.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Hurricane 1.JPG (17.8 KB, 80 views)
File Type: jpg Hurricane 2.JPG (25.4 KB, 78 views)
__________________

"Valor does not mean Hero."
Micdrow is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2007, 01:00 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
amrit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 194
I thought all the Soviet conversions to tandems were for training (which they did themselves) - the open second cockpit with MGs may have been for AG training.
amrit is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2007, 01:09 PM   #3
“Archive”
 
Micdrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 4,852
Quote:
Originally Posted by amrit View Post
I thought all the Soviet conversions to tandems were for training (which they did themselves) - the open second cockpit with MGs may have been for AG training.
Very possible, but was thinking that the russians were in need of good fighters in the beginning that it would be such a waste of a good fighter to use as a gunnery trainer. I would think it would be of better use by keeping it as a fighter or pilot fighter trainer.
__________________

"Valor does not mean Hero."
Micdrow is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2007, 01:43 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
amrit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 194
The Soviets had mixed feelings about the Hurricanes and Spitfires they received - but they did receive 2000 and 1000 of each respectively.

There's no mention of the tandems here, but it's an interesting read:

RAF Hurricanes in Russia

On another forum, a member has been trying to establish more details of the tandem conversions, but it seems to be agreed that 20 or so were done for training.
amrit is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2007, 02:36 PM   #5
“Archive”
 
Micdrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 4,852
Interesting read amrit, according to that web site if I read it right that they recieved 3000 hurricanes. With that many I can see why they had a few for training.

Thanks

Although I got to say I still would have throught that it would have been easier to convert other aircraft for the same roll. At least for gunnery practice.
__________________

"Valor does not mean Hero."
Micdrow is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2007, 03:17 PM   #6
Siggy Master
 
Wurger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Poland
Posts: 13,967
In many books on Hurricane I've found that Russians rebuilt several Mk.II for two seats but there haven't been stated what for. It seems that the kind of rebuilding was made not in Ryssia only.
There is a pic of Iranian dual control Hurri I've found in TBU no.132
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Hurricane IIC Iranian.jpg (111.9 KB, 67 views)
__________________



Last edited by Wurger; 05-05-2007 at 03:21 PM.
Wurger is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2007, 03:59 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
amrit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 194
Sorry Micdrow, sausage fingers.

And I've seen references to the Soviets converting a number of types to tandem types - all reference appear to be for training purposes. As to your picture, I wonder whether they'd seen details of the Hawker Henley, or even the Hotspur, and were trying it out for themselves? Can I ask where the pictures came from?

The Iranian tandems were supplied officially by the RAF ( I think two were supplied).
amrit is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2007, 05:03 PM   #8
“Archive”
 
Micdrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 4,852
The pictures came from a book called Hawker Hurricane by monografie. Issue 52. Cant read any of it but has some interesting pictures.
__________________

"Valor does not mean Hero."
Micdrow is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2007, 05:14 PM   #9
“Archive”
 
Micdrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 4,852
Couple of more pictures in the book
Attached Images
File Type: jpg hurricane 4.JPG (17.5 KB, 64 views)
File Type: jpg Hurricane 7.JPG (25.8 KB, 61 views)
__________________

"Valor does not mean Hero."

Last edited by Micdrow; 05-05-2007 at 05:46 PM.
Micdrow is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2007, 05:24 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
amrit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 194
The tandem pictures are interesting because the Iranians found the open second cockpit a problem and decided to enclose them. I can't find a photography but here's a silhouette.

Could you scan the captions for your first pictures? I'll try to use a polish translator.
Attached Images
File Type: gif avhurr7.gif (9.4 KB, 63 views)
amrit is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2007, 05:30 PM   #11
“Archive”
 
Micdrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 4,852
Will scan the captions. But for now here are a couple of more pictures from the Hawker Hurricane Aircam series book
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Hurricane 5.JPG (14.6 KB, 62 views)
File Type: jpg Hurricane 6.JPG (17.2 KB, 62 views)
__________________

"Valor does not mean Hero."
Micdrow is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2007, 05:34 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
amrit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 194
Those books look sweet - great photographs. I've just checked out their website (looks like I'll be maxing out my CC again!).
amrit is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2007, 05:41 PM   #13
“Archive”
 
Micdrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 4,852
Here are the two captions, First one is for the black and white picture. Second one is the profile caption.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Image 1.JPG (31.4 KB, 59 views)
File Type: jpg Image 2.JPG (9.7 KB, 60 views)
__________________

"Valor does not mean Hero."
Micdrow is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2007, 05:54 PM   #14
Senior Member
 
amrit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 194
The second caption basicly states that it's a two seater, back shooting, probably about 1942.

However, I've discovered on another forum that BW948 was an artillery spotter.

Will work on the first caption later - transcribing polish is tricky.
amrit is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2007, 06:02 PM   #15
“Archive”
 
Micdrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 4,852
Quote:
Originally Posted by amrit View Post
The second caption basicly states that it's a two seater, back shooting, probably about 1942.

However, I've discovered on another forum that BW948 was an artillery spotter.

Will work on the first caption later - transcribing polish is tricky.
Now thats interesting. Would explain why it had a rear facing gunner. Basically to watch and guard the rear while the pilot radioed in artillery. May I ask what Forum you read that from?
__________________

"Valor does not mean Hero."

Last edited by Micdrow; 05-05-2007 at 06:05 PM.
Micdrow is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:51 AM.
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Ad Management plugin by RedTyger
Design by HTWoRKS


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118