![]() |
| |||||||
| Aviation Discussion on the aircraft of WWII. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| “Archive” ![]() Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 4,852
| I ran into this profile and thought well maybe it was a fake. But then I found this photo of the aircraft. It looks like a normal two seater hurricane but instead of having a secondary pilot its set up for a gunner. Question is was these used as fighter's or where they used for ground attack aircraft with a rear gunner? Thanks in advance.
__________________ ![]() "Valor does not mean Hero." |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 194
| I thought all the Soviet conversions to tandems were for training (which they did themselves) - the open second cockpit with MGs may have been for AG training. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| “Archive” ![]() Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 4,852
| Very possible, but was thinking that the russians were in need of good fighters in the beginning that it would be such a waste of a good fighter to use as a gunnery trainer. I would think it would be of better use by keeping it as a fighter or pilot fighter trainer.
__________________ ![]() "Valor does not mean Hero." |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 194
| The Soviets had mixed feelings about the Hurricanes and Spitfires they received - but they did receive 2000 and 1000 of each respectively. There's no mention of the tandems here, but it's an interesting read: RAF Hurricanes in Russia On another forum, a member has been trying to establish more details of the tandem conversions, but it seems to be agreed that 20 or so were done for training. |
| | |
| | #5 |
| “Archive” ![]() Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 4,852
| Interesting read amrit, according to that web site if I read it right that they recieved 3000 hurricanes. With that many I can see why they had a few for training. Thanks Although I got to say I still would have throught that it would have been easier to convert other aircraft for the same roll. At least for gunnery practice.
__________________ ![]() "Valor does not mean Hero." |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Siggy Master ![]() Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Poland
Posts: 13,967
| In many books on Hurricane I've found that Russians rebuilt several Mk.II for two seats but there haven't been stated what for. It seems that the kind of rebuilding was made not in Ryssia only. There is a pic of Iranian dual control Hurri I've found in TBU no.132
__________________ ![]() Last edited by Wurger; 05-05-2007 at 03:21 PM. |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 194
| Sorry Micdrow, sausage fingers. And I've seen references to the Soviets converting a number of types to tandem types - all reference appear to be for training purposes. As to your picture, I wonder whether they'd seen details of the Hawker Henley, or even the Hotspur, and were trying it out for themselves? Can I ask where the pictures came from? The Iranian tandems were supplied officially by the RAF ( I think two were supplied). |
| | |
| | #8 |
| “Archive” ![]() Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 4,852
| The pictures came from a book called Hawker Hurricane by monografie. Issue 52. Cant read any of it but has some interesting pictures.
__________________ ![]() "Valor does not mean Hero." |
| | |
| | #9 |
| “Archive” ![]() Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 4,852
| Couple of more pictures in the book
__________________ ![]() "Valor does not mean Hero." Last edited by Micdrow; 05-05-2007 at 05:46 PM. |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 194
| The tandem pictures are interesting because the Iranians found the open second cockpit a problem and decided to enclose them. I can't find a photography but here's a silhouette. Could you scan the captions for your first pictures? I'll try to use a polish translator. |
| | |
| | #11 |
| “Archive” ![]() Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 4,852
| Will scan the captions. But for now here are a couple of more pictures from the Hawker Hurricane Aircam series book
__________________ ![]() "Valor does not mean Hero." |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 194
| Those books look sweet - great photographs. I've just checked out their website (looks like I'll be maxing out my CC again!). |
| | |
| | #13 |
| “Archive” ![]() Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 4,852
| Here are the two captions, First one is for the black and white picture. Second one is the profile caption.
__________________ ![]() "Valor does not mean Hero." |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 194
| The second caption basicly states that it's a two seater, back shooting, probably about 1942. However, I've discovered on another forum that BW948 was an artillery spotter. Will work on the first caption later - transcribing polish is tricky. |
| | |
| | #15 |
| “Archive” ![]() Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 4,852
| Now thats interesting. Would explain why it had a rear facing gunner. Basically to watch and guard the rear while the pilot radioed in artillery. May I ask what Forum you read that from?
__________________ ![]() "Valor does not mean Hero." Last edited by Micdrow; 05-05-2007 at 06:05 PM. |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |