Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums

he 162 salamander

Aviation Discuss he 162 salamander in the World War II - Aviation forums; Not for me, gents. I wouldn´t like the worse forcedynamics of a forward swept wing, remember the Ju-287, ...


Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > World War II - Aviation > Aviation

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 02-14-2006, 11:49 AM   #31
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Berlin (Kreuzberg)
Posts: 1,479
Not for me, gents.
I wouldn´t like the worse forcedynamics of a forward swept wing, remember the Ju-287, worse aeroelastics if I recall correctly.
The A6 subtype looks great and the He-162 C (resp. -D there are problems with the designations: if HeS011 driven is -B then forward swept is -C and positive sweep is -D, otherwise it is called -C) with swept back wings would look sexy, too...
Attached Images
File Type: jpg he_162cord_770.jpg (21.0 KB, 246 views)
File Type: jpg he_162a6_137.jpg (21.0 KB, 246 views)
__________________
---delcyros---
delcyros is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2006, 01:05 PM   #32
Senior Member
 
Smokey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 533
The swept wing version would be nice since experience from the Me 262 could be used
Smokey is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2006, 06:00 PM   #33
Senior Member
 
Henk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: George - South Africa
Posts: 2,369
Country:
Send a message via MSN to Henk
I must say the normal He-162 looks better for me, but the forward swept wing He-162 does have its good things when it comes to looks.

Henk
__________________


The ultimate revolution in aircraft designs during WW2
Henk is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2006, 10:05 AM   #34
Senior Member
 
Twitch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: City of the Angels California
Posts: 810
The reason for the proposed forward sweep was to raise the low critical Mach number. The Russians seemed to be on top of all with all the work they did with the Ju 287 and offsprings over the years?!

Ef-140
__________________
Twitch is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2006, 03:12 PM   #35
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Berlin (Kreuzberg)
Posts: 1,479
The forward swept wing had another advantage: while swept back wings loose efficiancy at low speeds (especially at stall speeds), the forwards swept wing will remain controllability even at very high angle´s of attack. The lift at low speed is better, too. The Ju-287 test reports confirmed this but for some worrisome aeroelastic problems. The lates Junkers designs (Ju-EF132) under german controll showed against the swept back wing layout.
__________________
---delcyros---
delcyros is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2006, 04:21 PM   #36
the old Sage
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Platonic Sphere
Posts: 8,665
Country:
this mention actually goes with the 262 variants but the Welter group was going to strip a 262 and put forward cants on that puppy. they had already experimented with the AR 234 and their was a good feeling about it due to the long narrow streamlined shape but initially the impression was total blindness from city fires because of literally too much glas in the pilots face. the changes were subtle and Arado never did put in a firm bid with the Messerch. 262 for the nf, even after refocusing the attention of where to put the cockpit armor and guns, ammo packs besides the inclusion of radar though the internal AI dish seemed to work in excellent form in later experiments.

sorry if this is a tad bit tweed
__________________
shhhh ........ es ist ein Geheimnis
Erich is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2006, 11:18 AM   #37
Senior Member
 
Twitch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: City of the Angels California
Posts: 810
Check out the X-29 reference to the Ju- 287 http://www.globalsecurity.org/milita...craft/x-29.htm I saw this fly around Edwards during tests.
__________________
Twitch is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2006, 11:59 AM   #38
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: London
Posts: 2,757
If I remember my aerodynamics lessons another advantage of forward swept wings was a reduction in Induced drag. It was a long time ago now and could well be wrong on that.
Glider is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2006, 05:35 PM   #39
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Berlin (Kreuzberg)
Posts: 1,479
Indeed this is the case. Since the airfoil is getting thinner at the wingtips and airflow is more directed inwardly the wingtip drag is reduced, particularly compared to swept forward wings. Good memory, Glider.
__________________
---delcyros---
delcyros is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
   

AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com Avitop.com


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83