 | He277: Promising? Or further development of a bad apple?| Aviation Discuss He277: Promising? Or further development of a bad apple? in the World War II - Aviation forums; The He 277 was also faster then the He177.What it did need was a pair of BMW 022.... |
|
07-04-2006, 07:40 PM
|
#16 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: London Ontario Canada
Posts: 199
Country: | The He 277 was also faster then the He177.What it did need was a pair of BMW 022. |
| |
07-06-2006, 12:24 PM
|
#17 | | Der Crewchief
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 30,198
Country: | I agree delycros. The He-177, He-274, He-277 were all promising designs but were no longer needed.
Interesting stuff V-1710, I knew about some of the design flaws with the coupled engines but not all of them. Good stuff.
__________________ US Army Blackhawk Crewchief 2000-2006 Classic ww2aircraft.net quotes: fly boy said: "isn't that the first jet bomber? becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles" "wait what ok who made the b-2 crash come on people that messed up its a b-2" "ah yes the mistel those things are so annoying is games and in real life" |
| |
07-07-2006, 11:43 AM
|
#18 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: City of the Angels California
Posts: 810
| Uh, the main difference of the He 177 and the subsequent 274 and 277 was that the latter pair were conceived as high altitude bombers. The He 274 with an offensive load of 8,800 lbs. could reach 42,650 feet with a maximum altitude of 46, 920 feet. It could hit 360 MPH at 36,090 feet too. Range was 2,640 miles, less than the 177's 3,400 miles.
Like the He 274 the He 277 abandoned the problematic engine coupling and used four nacelles. The 277B-5/R2 was set up to hit 49,210 feet. Max speed was 354 MPH but range was 3,728 miles.
The He 277B-6/R1 could do 348 MPH, hit 43,960 feer but had a range of 4,475miles. Both models could 1,100 lbs of internal ordnance but were set up to carry 5,512 lbs of SC 2500 bombs, Henschel he 293 or 294 missiles or the FX 1400 Fritz X guided bombs externally.
__________________ |
| |
07-07-2006, 02:47 PM
|
#19 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: St. Louis, Mo.
Posts: 217
| Would the HE 177 have been a better bomber if not given the direction of being "dive bomer capable"? |
| |
07-07-2006, 02:57 PM
|
#20 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Berlin (Kreuzberg)
Posts: 1,537
| Hard to say. I always believed that the structural reinforcements made the plane more sturdy and allowed to take much more battle damage than a plane of itīs size could usually take. The main problem has been pointed out above, the engine coupling. Without structural reinforcements and with a smaller airframe design, the plane could probably be driven by two BMW 801 TJ with almost equal performance, but who knows?
__________________ ---delcyros--- |
| |
07-07-2006, 03:06 PM
|
#21 | | IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 13,524
Country: | I don't know guys, after reading all this (and having a maintainer's background) I think the HE.177/ 277 was just a giant pile of crap and would of been a nightmare to maintain!!! Maintenance wise i think it might of made the B-29 look like a Piper Cub!!!!!!
__________________ "IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT" |
| |
07-07-2006, 03:16 PM
|
#22 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Berlin (Kreuzberg)
Posts: 1,537
| Generally spoken, I tend to disagree, but not by much. The B-29 with itīs sophisticated AA systems is much more worrisome to maintain than a refined He-177. Nethertheless this ship needed manpower and more worrisome: high grade fuel. A single Geschwader (100-120 planes) would take about 1/5 of the Reichs high grade fuel reserves in less than two weeks!
Another reason to move towards jet propulsion, they could use the low grade fuel, still avaiable for the Luftwaffe in 1945.
__________________ ---delcyros--- |
| |
07-11-2006, 04:12 AM
|
#23 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 152
| Did any He-177's survive the war? I seem to remember seeing a picture of an He-177 in U.S.A.A.F. markings, taken at the end of the war. |
| |
07-11-2006, 10:30 AM
|
#24 | | Der Crewchief
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 30,198
Country: | Quote: |
Originally Posted by Twitch Uh, the main difference of the He 177 and the subsequent 274 and 277 was that the latter pair were conceived as high altitude bombers. The He 274 with an offensive load of 8,800 lbs. could reach 42,650 feet with a maximum altitude of 46, 920 feet. It could hit 360 MPH at 36,090 feet too. Range was 2,640 miles, less than the 177's 3,400 miles.
Like the He 274 the He 277 abandoned the problematic engine coupling and used four nacelles. The 277B-5/R2 was set up to hit 49,210 feet. Max speed was 354 MPH but range was 3,728 miles.
The He 277B-6/R1 could do 348 MPH, hit 43,960 feer but had a range of 4,475miles. Both models could 1,100 lbs of internal ordnance but were set up to carry 5,512 lbs of SC 2500 bombs, Henschel he 293 or 294 missiles or the FX 1400 Fritz X guided bombs externally. | Imagine if the Luftwaffe had bombers with that alltitude and that could carry that magnitude of bomb load in 1940 during the Battle of Britian.
__________________ US Army Blackhawk Crewchief 2000-2006 Classic ww2aircraft.net quotes: fly boy said: "isn't that the first jet bomber? becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles" "wait what ok who made the b-2 crash come on people that messed up its a b-2" "ah yes the mistel those things are so annoying is games and in real life" |
| |
07-11-2006, 12:40 PM
|
#25 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: City of the Angels California
Posts: 810
| Adler- They were on the right track with the Ju 86P in mid 1940- a little too late for quantity production. However an undetected photo recon sortie was flown at 41,000 in the summer during the BoB. Several Ju 86P-1s and P-2s were delivered to 2./Aufkl.gr.Ob.d.L in 1940 and some missions were flown over the British Isles.
They were powered by Jumo 207A-1 6-cylinder diesels. The original concept was as a bomber with a slow climb to over 39,000 feet and cruise at 215 MPH to target, drop to 32-33,000 feet, release 2,200 lbs. of ordnance and go back up to 37,000 for the return home.
Don't know why but they were only used and developed further as high altitude recon ships.
__________________ |
| |
07-11-2006, 08:17 PM
|
#26 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: George - South Africa
Posts: 2,655
Country: | I wonder if any He-177 survived the war as well. Did any?
__________________
The ultimate revolution in aircraft designs during WW2 |
| |
07-12-2006, 11:49 AM
|
#27 | | Der Crewchief
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 30,198
Country: | Quote: |
Originally Posted by Twitch Adler- They were on the right track with the Ju 86P in mid 1940- a little too late for quantity production. However an undetected photo recon sortie was flown at 41,000 in the summer during the BoB. Several Ju 86P-1s and P-2s were delivered to 2./Aufkl.gr.Ob.d.L in 1940 and some missions were flown over the British Isles.
They were powered by Jumo 207A-1 6-cylinder diesels. The original concept was as a bomber with a slow climb to over 39,000 feet and cruise at 215 MPH to target, drop to 32-33,000 feet, release 2,200 lbs. of ordnance and go back up to 37,000 for the return home.
Don't know why but they were only used and developed further as high altitude recon ships. | Yeah I read about that mission and knew of the Ju-86 as well. I have some interesting pictures of the photo recon version in a book of mine about KG-200.
__________________ US Army Blackhawk Crewchief 2000-2006 Classic ww2aircraft.net quotes: fly boy said: "isn't that the first jet bomber? becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles" "wait what ok who made the b-2 crash come on people that messed up its a b-2" "ah yes the mistel those things are so annoying is games and in real life" |
| |
07-12-2006, 12:25 PM
|
#28 | | Der Crewchief
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 30,198
Country: | Quote: |
Originally Posted by Henk I wonder if any He-177 survived the war as well. Did any? | Plenty survived the war. I just dont know what happened to them after the war. I believe 1 or 2 are in museums. I think the National Air and Space Museum has one but it is not on display right now.
__________________ US Army Blackhawk Crewchief 2000-2006 Classic ww2aircraft.net quotes: fly boy said: "isn't that the first jet bomber? becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles" "wait what ok who made the b-2 crash come on people that messed up its a b-2" "ah yes the mistel those things are so annoying is games and in real life" |
| |
07-12-2006, 03:18 PM
|
#29 | | aka Dickcheese
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Washington State
Posts: 10,899
Country: | Quote: |
Originally Posted by FLYBOYJ I don't know guys, after reading all this (and having a maintainer's background) I think the HE.177/ 277 was just a giant pile of crap and would of been a nightmare to maintain!!! Maintenance wise i think it might of made the B-29 look like a Piper Cub!!!!!! | I'm with you Flyboy. I think that my thread has come full circle. I too have a real world airworthiness background and think this plane was plagued by too many technical issues requiring their resolution in a very short time for the airplane to accomplish its intended mission. Doesn't mean I don't find the airplane as one of the most beatiful to have come out of the war though.  |
| |
07-13-2006, 04:51 AM
|
#30 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 152
| N.A.S.M. (Smithsonian) has a He-219, of all things, but doesn't seem to have an He-177. |
| | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:46 AM. |  | |